this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
40 points (93.5% liked)

Programming

28251 readers
298 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Vosh@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Adobe is scum. But it's important to know what they are up to.

I'm pretty sure they have a team spying on open source projects. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if they tried to undermine them.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

GPU-based imaging

Sounds like a good idea. The original engine was written for mostly CPU-based processing, and parallel compute has become much more of a thing since then.

They won't be able to do everything on a GPU, but they can optimize the system for GPU compute and have graceful fallback for operations that a GPU can't do.

considers

They might also consider adding distributed support. My understanding is that Photoshop is cloud-based these days. I haven't used Photoshop in decades, never seen the cloud-based product, but if most of the compute happens server-side, I imagine that that's a lot more amenable to selling higher-end services where you loop more hardware in for more compute capability.

That'd be an area where they could legitimately bill cloud-based operation as a plus versus local stuff like Gimp.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

I’d say the desktop offering is the main thing, but moving further into the cloud could be an interesting move on the subscription journey. Not interesting for me, as a user, but as a concept and an investment for the company.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

[raises hand] I’ve used MatLab instead of Photoshop, I guess.

Seriously though, as an amateur photographer, working on a new engine instead of just adding more gen AI features to every pixel sounds like a good move. I’ll be sticking with my buy-once option, either way.

As a developer I also found this interesting:

Can make steady progress even when a problem is ambiguous or not fully prioritized yet

That’s a super important skill a lot of people don’t even want to develop.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Better than buy once, try and if you like donate options

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In concept, absolutely, but I tried and didn’t like.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you don't lose anything win-win

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only the time I took to play around with FOSS options, which is fine for a hobby. There are actually really good options out there, they just don’t match my needs.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True. How much time you invest in "playing around" is your choice. I mostly treat it like a video game demo. I play for a bit and if I enjoy it I'll donate. If I see issues or it doesn't do what I want I don't donate.

[–] nebeker@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Right. I’ve been known to open an issue and move on with my life. That’s not nothing, as far as contributing to FOSS.