this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
555 points (99.1% liked)

Selfhosted

61544 readers
426 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details. Tags [CBH] or [AIP] are required, see the links in Rule 8 for details.

  8. AI-related discussions and AI-involved promotional posts have additional requirements for tagging, as noted in Rule 7 and the AI & Promotional Post Expanded Rules post, and find example disclosures here.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This website made me reconsider if 99.9999% SLA and always online is really that important for lots of websites. I used to self-host my own server in my own apartment, but gave up on that after my internet provider had their first major outage that lasted almost a week. Also I didn't want to worry about the fire hazard, or the server going down when I was traveling etc.

But a solar powered server seems interesting, if the batteries could be made fire safe.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lemuria@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The 1% of the time it's down, there's always the Internet Archive or reading your own downloaded copy.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lead-acid batteries work if you don't care about weight and lithium-iron phosphate if you do

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're better off with the LiFePO4 batteries even if you don't care about weight. A lead acid battery will wear out quickly when you cycle it daily. Lithium also has a higher charging efficiency, so you get more usable power from the solar panel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Appreciate the website itself, with it's dithered low-colour PNG illustrations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago

Use a gell cell lead acid battery (the kind that go in regular UPSs). No fire hazzard, ans bonus, they can survive freezing temperatures just fine if outdoors. Downside is replacing a cheap battery every 3 years.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I'm not sure what relation that has to this solar powered website.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Btteries can catch fire. Certain types. Although one would probably not use batteries that are prone to that. Like Lithium Ion.

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

They were saying they were concerned about fire risk with their non-battery setup. They brought up this setup as if it'd alleviate that risk.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Of course, it depends on the website. I'd be unhappy if my banking site went down for more than a day.

ihavenotv.com could go down for weeks, and I wouldn't fret it.

[–] Nyvios@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Current uptime of over 23 weeks, not bad

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's late summer now, best possible time to measure solar-powered uptime. Roughly 5 months, i.e. since mid March, i.e. springtime in Spain. Many daylight hours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Does anyone remember when businesses would operate their websites only during business hours and then take most of the functionality offline after hours?

I'm possibly also mis-remembering my early internet years and just talking shit.

[–] jake_jake_jake_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

New York State's civil service pension/retirement system is still like this. Including holidays.

[–] Shameless@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Thats so cool to know!

[–] AvocadoSandwich@eviltoast.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is sometimes still a thing. I know of at least one religious news organisation that takes the website offline on Sundays.

[–] kestrel7_7@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

B&H Photo will not process your order on the Jewish day of rest, it's amazing. https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/httwww.bhphotovideo.com/find/SHcalendar.jsp

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] remon@ani.social 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

All websites go offline when there is no power ...

[–] tracyspcy@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

This actually cool.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

There are solutions like IPFS for decentralized content hosting so downtime of a primary resource is less important.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Cute, even if deeply impractical for most server applications.

We need more of those weird enthusiast projects around, and we need to hear of them.

Still, going all green and then selling sets of four physical books is a little odd.

[–] lavander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Barcelona pff… now do it in Oslo! 🤣

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›