this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2026
290 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

87390 readers
3818 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new Coddy Developer Survey found that four in five developers, 80%, say their use of AI has felt more like a dependence than an advantage.

(page 2) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dregan@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (14 children)

Maybe it's just because Anthropic is so many more miles ahead than OpenAI, but I have not had the "it doesn't work" experience that people are talking about here. I've set up agentic pipelines with code architecture guidelines, the orchestrator calls the implementer, tester, reviewer when needed. If the developed code isn't up to standard or the work item isn't fully captured, it'll reject it and send it back to implementation. It invokes the architect if it runs into something unanticipated. The pipeline can run a feature with high accuracy and very little input.

I've even used it to run batteries of frozen experiments on self synthesized data using its own simulation harnesses to discover novel techniques that work in the real world. If it isn't helpful, I feel like you are doing it wrong.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 8 points 6 hours ago

That's why they say it empowers people that already have the knowledge but beginners can't control it. Basically somebody that controls the dog versus a small kid walking a big dog where if the dog goes, the kid gets dragged along behind it.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 0 points 5 hours ago

Pretty much my experience and I didn't even have to do workflows or complex harnesses, I wrote a "dont ask" mode wrapper that gives rights to read/write a work dir & explanation that blockers & questions need to be written in a specific directory, and I listen to this directory with a GUI app that notifies me, then also a stop hook that verifies that that doc is updated when it stops, and has all the items done/blocked.

I did this cause I like the flexibility of a normal agentic chat session.

Recent LLM are smart enough to resolve many problems as is in agentic mode. Really strange to see "it doesnt work" copium instead of fighting for the means of production and looking for a way to have this setup purely local.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yeah....

Most of the time it doesn't work, rarely it does.

Intermittent rewards are what we're wired for. That's why random rewards/acknowledgment tickle our brains more than standard rewards we know are coming.

That's the reason there's such a big push "to just try it".

It's the same strategy the first crack dealers used

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 4 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

It feels so weird to read lemmy, as if I'm living in a different reality. To me, most of the time an agent can oneshot a ticket (if it has a good, non-vague description) or at least do 80-90% that can be fixed with several changes or prompts, and only odd tasks need more manual investigations than that.

Surely you still need a dev oversight and someone needs to do tech plans & lead the projects, but that's not like anything people experience here.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

For the little stuff sure. Most of us are the ones that handle the odd tasks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] unpossum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I’m in the same reality as you, but usually I don’t bother to write too much about it on lemmy - people here don’t seem to appreciate different opinions on AI. But you’re not the only one :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chunes@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago

They're probably talking about the free version of gemini or something.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›