this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
760 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

87447 readers
2884 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The country needs to find a “compromise” between privacy and safety, according to Flock Safety CEO Garrett Langley.

“When people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they’re prioritizing the wrong thing, and what we have to prioritize as a country is compromise,” Langley said during a recent interview with Fox News. “How do we have our safety, and how do we balance privacy?”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 5 points 3 hours ago

Ole Ben Franklin is particularly relevant here:

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

In other words, Flock can go fuck themselves with a stiff wire brush.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 11 points 16 hours ago

What the fuck kind of compromise? "Let us technical loophole around your constitutional rights just a little bit?"

How about we compromise and let that guy in Tennessee hang you just a little bit.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

I propose this compromise:

  • No surveillance, at all.
  • Flock rebrands to the shitty SaaS startup its name suggested it to be. I want to see the YouTube ads for "IrfanView, but paid and is a 500+MB chromium app"!
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 19 hours ago

Compromise dez nuts

Fucking fascist.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 41 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Compromise: Quit now, and keep your head.

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 15 points 19 hours ago

I like the whole "publicly hanged for treason" thing.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

was about to make a similar post.

Stop building the invasive bullshit, or we start building guillotines.

[–] isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (4 children)

Here's my compromise: we give the Flock CEO twenty to life instead of sentencing him to public flaying like he deserves.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Im on board with this.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

public flaying?

No, no.. Blood Eagle.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 19 points 20 hours ago

How about we don't duplicate George Orwells 1984 irl?

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago

Little bitch is negotiating, and it's not even Halloween, yet.

Here's a compromise: how about you fuck off?

[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago

The compromise is you scrap every camera, or we do.

[–] ironpangolin29@lemmy.ca 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

That's how you know the reasons behind flock is nefarious, when they have to scale back what they're doing because of how blatantly obvious the overreach and invasion of privacy.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 15 hours ago

they give the data to palantir, they are pretty linked to gether.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago

Compromise offer: you stop spying on us and we'll stop breaking your cameras.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 18 points 23 hours ago

Compromise: kill yourself

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The more you learn about Flock, the scarier it gets. They have FULL profiles built on EVERY american that has flock cameras nearby. All your shopping, driving, financial habits are tracked. They know who all your friends and family are and how often you visit, they track your vehicles specific identifiable features like bumper damage, stickers, faded paint, etc. All of that is a complete violation of the 4th amendment and all these companies need to be sued.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 19 hours ago

Even deeper, they claim to be able to read "pet tags," which would mean they can read ANY RFID, they know your gym code, if you have a fob for your apartment they can clone it and get in like a kid with a Flipper 0.

Idk how it's physically possible so hopefully they're lying, they should have to be basically touching the tag, but they claim they can. I'd believe they can read UHF RFID but that isn't what they claimed, they specified "pet tags" (which again, would mean they can do all tags.) And that would mean they can add NFC and read your cards in your wallet, if they wanted, because that isn't far off from RFID. Now ostensibly they'd have to perform the handshake with your card so they'd only have the same partial info a Flipper could pull, but like, still not a fan of that personally.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.app 9 points 21 hours ago

Take your cameras down and maybe people don't want to destroy them. Good compromise, eh?

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is absolutely no reason to track people everywhere they go. We were fine before these things.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup, violent crime has been dropping for decades and not an insignificant drop. We did not need mass surveillance, we did not want mass surveillance, nor do we want it now.

[–] cy888@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Lead levels dropped

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Here is your compromise. Shutter your company & we won't hang you.

[–] ElChinchilla@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can guarantee this has been said already, but the compromise is simple; no flock cameras (or comparable tech) anywhere.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

Corporate CEOs can all have 1 camera each, on their front lawn, for them to hang from.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And the zombies said "all we want to do is eat your brains, maybe we can compromise..."

[–] ThillyGooth@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"We're not unreasonable; I mean, no one's gonna eat your eyes"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What the US should prioritize is opportunity, education, corporate regulation, housing affordability, justice and dealing with corruption.

Gee, then they wouldn't need the surveillance state.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You're right, but all the 1% heard was: you think they should have less yacht money.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I am not even against the yacht money, just fucking STOP with the ARISTOCRATIC behaviors, dynamics, incentives.

I support a wealth cap ample enough to own a yacht, but not enough to make rogue aristocravcy viable. At least for now. The billionaires are doing everything they can to convince me that maybe even the yacht money is too much wealth holding.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Thr yact money is definitely too much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sqauffle@slrpnk.net 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

A bag of dicks, even

[–] chellewalker@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These concerns aren’t just hypothetical. The Washington Post recently identified 46 cases where police officers have been accused of using Flock technology for unauthorized purposes, including to stalk their wives, girlfriends, or exes.

After listening to an interview with one of the alleged victims, Langley told CBS News, “I apologize. It kills me that she went through that.” At the same time, he insisted, “I don’t think that Flock created police abuse. I think we’re the first company to ever shine a light on it and build the tools to find it.”

Oh fuck off. You don't get to call yourself a hero for making a problem worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] desuwu@piefed.blahaj.zone 33 points 1 day ago

No, Garrett, we don't negotiate with surveillance states.

[–] Ravenheart@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No compromises with fascists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Pillory this man. I am not joking even a little. Put him in stocks in the middle of a major city and encourage people to pelt him with rotting produce.

[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I do not want Flock cameras surveiling me or my car where it will inevitably become data that's combined with a million other data points on me that might be able to determine what I'm doing, what I'm thinking, and what I might do in the future, just to be able to say we're "safer".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

*We didn't invent police abuse! We actually shined a light on it and pointed it out"

Fuck right the hell off with this shit. You don't get to sell your panopticon to a group that routinely abuses every tool they have, and feign ignorance in defense of the results.

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Tar and feathers are not expensive, and it's a hilarious thing to do to someone

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Nah.

No compromise with our rights being infringed upon.

Destroy them all.

[–] scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Anyone who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserves neither.

Garrett can get fucked.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RoddyStiggs@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We had a compromise. It's called the bill of rights. Goes like this:

  1. I'll say what I fucking want and associate with who I fucking please.
  2. I'll fucking shoot you if you get in the way.
  3. You stay rhe fuck out of my house.
  4. Did you fucking hear me? STAY OUT OF MY HOUSE. AND LEAVE MY SHIT ALONE.
  5. You're not the fucking boss of me. My crew will tell me when I'm out of line.
  6. I'm fucking going home when I please, no matter what you say I did.
  7. If you think I owe you, I don't unless my crew fucking says so.
  8. Don't fuck with me about shit that doesn't deserve it.
  9. Just because I didn't say it doesn't mean you shouldn't back the fuck off. Use your goddamn brain.
  10. You don't get to make up shit and say you're in charge of it. My house. My rules.
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›