this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

33112 readers
1550 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Guillotines

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 hours ago

Police. As much as I hate their current incarnation, I. Some form or fashion they are required to handle those that do harm to others intentionally.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Government.

In an ideal world, everyone would get along and coordinate effectively in a voluntary manner. There would be no need for any government to enforce laws or provide services.

[–] TheBeege@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Money. It encourages greed, but it allows us to scale exchange of goods and services far more than we otherwise could

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 1 day ago

Existence. It's also a paradox because without existence it's impossible to be either evil or necessary.

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Luigi mangione

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Killing hitler and the nazis. Not just the top guys. Also the bottom layers of the system.

Killing is bad. But...its nazis.

Same also goes to all other dictators and their helpers. Stalin, Mao, Mussolini, Putin, Assat, Lenin

load more comments (3 replies)

Violence against fascists.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 57 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tax. Noone wants their money to be taken away. But it's probably a good idea to have at least some government funded stuff.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I mean, corrupted administration aside, is it really even "evil" to fund a institution that forsee the development of your surrounding? If anything it's simply quid pro quo, and people who generally against any taxation is always fishy to me.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For the general masses that lack fucking brain cells. Some people actually comprehend the value of society and central public resources and WANT their money collectively put to good use.

[–] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Polarization is causing a lot of people to doubt that the collective money actually will be put to good use. In a lot of places (like my country, Israel) they're damn right, it's not.

[–] Emi@ani.social 13 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I might be wrong but I think people would gladly pay 50% of their income as tax if it meant they would get their basic needs met and see the money be put to a good use. Imagine getting just half your pay but be able to fully use it on whatever you want and not have to worry about food and rent. Or at least that's what I'd like to believe.

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The Blackfoot nation on which Maslow based his hierarchy of needs would actually have a celebration each year where they'd give everything they'd amassed away.

The actual basis for the "hierarchy" of needs is essentially that a community takes care of each other so that all needs are met, and this is found not just in Blackfoot but along the majority of indigenous cultures. (I write in quotes because it was never really a hierarchy, it was more of a cyclical chain of getting needs met)

There's a really good read on what inspired the Hierarchy of Needs here. Most of the changes that Maslow made to his findings were actually due to him wanting to make it more palatable for his individualistic colonial audience.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The tax being on your income and not entirely on corporations always felt like a fairly biased distinction. If companies paid the entire income tax long before it got to you, and you were simply paid ~2/3rds as much, I feel like people’s opinions would be different despite not much changing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] notabot@piefed.social 48 points 1 day ago

Surgery, especially on animals.

In any other context, someone cutting you open, slicing bits out or rearranging them, them sewing you shut would be considered horrific, but we do it because we know that the short term suffering out weighs the long term harm of not doing it. When you choose it for yourself it might not be too 'evil', but an animal would not understand, even if you know it will mean they get to live a long, happy life, free of the pain and suffering that issue would otherwise cause.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 36 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Prison seems the obvious one. It's obviously (to me, that is) not desirable to deprive anyone of their freedom, but for persistently violent people I don't think there's a better solution, unfortunately.

nah, the justice system is absolutely fucked. in a world where we remake the law around restorative and rehabilitative justice rather than punitive, we're probably not even going to be calling it "prison" anymore

[–] Mastema@infosec.pub 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree that separating people who do not abide by the contract of society is necessary, but I think we (America) are wrong to make it a punitive experience. Separate them and let them live their lives as comfortably as they can. Causing additional suffering does not seem to be necessary.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Currently trying to lock up as many of the populace all the numbers show cause less crime. At some point we are going to have to question if there is a higher percentage of psychopaths out of prison than in.

Edit: note, a large group of people would say "we need to lock up more people to solve it" and a large group of people would say "we need to let out all the not-psychopaths who aren't a threat to society and then only arrest those who are a threat". And somehow both would think they were humane. And propoganda would role out to convince the first group they should lock up the second group. Because compassion or empathy is a threat

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I bought a Pixel so could install a degoogle OS on the phone. This largely removed Google from my life.

[–] Laristal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Shame they're making that harder going forward by removing pixel specific info from the build tree

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I considered that risk before getting a Pixel 8 and it burns a little yeah. I'll use it like every other phone that stops getting updates for a few more years in the worst case scenario, then move to FairPhone I guess.

[–] RodgeGrabTheCat@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The updates will take a little longer that is all. GOS is not in the same boat as other custom rom devs - they don't have build trees either.

GOS is talking to a couple of OEMs about getting a GOS phone produced.

load more comments (1 replies)

Evil that's necessary isn't evil, just painful.

Anyway, my example: a fever? 😅

[–] T3CHT@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lobotomy, electroshock and castration are historic treatments for various extreme mental disorders that were, probably mistakenly, considered necessary evils lacking other treatments.

These days prozac, benzos and lithium fall into a similar category.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I'm not sure if you're comparing SSRIs to castration but I'm gonna assume you're not.

I dont think any prescriber would consider any of those medicines necessary. a much better example would be steroids like prednisone. it weakens your immune system, but it's absolutely necessary at times.

SSRIs are rarely necessary, but are a useful tool. too much to say on this.

Benzos are a short term solution to enable more longer term treatments. they're absolute monsters of a drug class, but really effective for sure.

fentanyl would be a better example of a necessary evil. it's synthesis revolutionized surgery.

finally, lithium is a funny example -- we still don't even really know how it works!! but it's a mood stabilizer and can be hugely beneficial for managing bipolar disorder. that said, one can attempt to manage bipolar symptoms without medications, but it's certainly going to be harder and possibly less effective

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 3 points 1 day ago

When your only option to make people talk about your cause and occupation is comitting attrocities

load more comments
view more: next ›