60
Time to quit your pointless job, become morally ambitious and change the world
(www.theguardian.com)
His politics were idiosyncratic. His beliefs in aristocracy would fit in well with the antidemocratic side of MAGA thought. However he also greatly valued art and, of course, philisophy, so I think he'd be turned off by the philistinism of MAGA.
Overall, he was probably too independent minded to slot in with the cultishness of it all, but I think he'd be MAGA-sympathetic and certainly more critical of the Democrats than of the Republicans.
The article does say exactly that.