this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
404 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

72932 readers
3048 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Yeah... It's useful for summarizing searches but I'm tempted to disable it in VSCode because it's been getting in the way more than helping lately.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 132 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (56 children)

Experienced software developer, here. "AI" is useful to me in some contexts. Specifically when I want to scaffold out a completely new application (so I'm not worried about clobbering existing code) and I don't want to do it by hand, it saves me time.

And... that's about it. It sucks at code review, and will break shit in your repo if you let it.

[–] CabbageRelish@midwest.social 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

On that last note, important thing they left out here being general news reporting tech stuff is that this was specifically bug fixing tasks. It can typically only provide the broadest of advice on that, and it’s largely incapable of tackling problems holistically when you often need to be thinking big picture while tackling a bug.

Interesting that the AI devs thought they were being quicker though.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Same. I also like it for basic research and helping with syntax for obscure SQL queries, but coding hasn't worked very well. One of my less technical coworkers tried to vibe code something and it didn't work well. Maybe it would do okay on something routine, but generally speaking it would probably be better to use a library for that anyway.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I actively hate the term "vibe coding." The fact is, while using an LLM for certain tasks is helpful, trying to build out an entire, production-ready application just by prompts is a huge waste of time and is guaranteed to produce garbage code.

At some point, people like your coworker are going to have to look at the code and work on it, and if they don't know what they're doing, they'll fail.

I commend them for giving it a shot, but I also commend them for recognizing it wasn't working.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think the term pretty accurately describes what is going on: they don't know how to code, but they do know what correct output for a given input looks like, so they iterate with the LLM until they get what they want. The coding here is based on vibes (does the output feel correct?) instead of logic.

I don't think there's any problem with the term, the problem is with what's going on.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

That's fair. I guess what I hate is what the term represents, rather than the term itself.

load more comments (54 replies)
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›