this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
155 points (80.9% liked)

Technology

88183 readers
3233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 53 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What happened to just making a damn good browser

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 53 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Mozilla is in the sweet spot of basically being the only available browser that isnt chrome, that has adblocking.

and they are doing everything in their power to fuck it up by chasing this bullshit AI trend thats already dying on the vine.

[–] Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 days ago

On one side, its great that forks exist that strip out a lot of the bullshit. On the other hand if main Firefox dies or goes too far into the deep end, there's no way those forks can take its role

[–] furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 82 points 6 days ago (1 children)

yeah no thanks. luckily librewolf strips this shit out.

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

or you can just turn it off from settings

[–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Or they can stop trying to force it through their users throat and just accept that the biggest part of their users don't want it.

[–] lastweakness@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I mean, they do give a single toggle that disables every AI feature (new and old) at once... I think that's pretty good

[–] Vespair@lemmy.zip 9 points 5 days ago

But why isn't it a toggle that turns these features on instead?

It's bullshit that we're expected to constantly opt-OUT of these features that we supposed want. If we wanted them, we would turn them on.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

accept that the biggest part of their users don’t want it.

Where did you find this data?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Willdrick@lemmy.world 47 points 5 days ago (31 children)

I don't really mind AI features where it makes sense. That being said, as someone else commented, this should have been a plugin.

I'll add on top of that: this should have been a plugin wholly developed by Mistral. Mozilla should stop spending time and money on side features and focus on the browser and its engine. It still is way slower than any chromium based browser, lacks features that have been standard on chromium for years (eg. HDR video playback) and it's way less efficient on battery than the competition.

Complaining about Firefox doing this and groveling on "I'm good, I'm on " is spitting upwards: even the most modified forks like Zen still rely on Mozilla's aging engine.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Exactly. The Blender foundation has stated that it is a tool by humans and for humans, so no AI functionality is planned. However, there are still MCP extensions and the like. There’s nothing stopping anyone from using AI with Blender, but the Blender Foundation funding goes to core development. Not sure why Mozilla isn’t doing the same. If I really want a LLM controlling a browser, playwright-cli works fine anyway.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don’t trust any feature that uses the word “AI.”

Ideally, such things should be transparent to the user. As in features that are useful without having to understand the underlying programming mechanisms.

Take FF’s local translation. That’s an immensely useful feature. No one cares that it uses a language model or about any of the details, because it just works well enough, and is useful enough to stand on its own as an advantage over Chromium.

…If they have to brand a feature to make it appealing, that’s a bad sign. Otherwise why TF would I want expensive tab sorting or things like that?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] ilqqe@sopuli.xyz 4 points 4 days ago

Mozilla execs got an angry phone call from their sugar daddies at Google demanding they drive off the last remaining FF users (allegedly)

[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 days ago

They should stop doing that, instead

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Even if LLMs were environmentally and socially sustainable they would still be a massive IP theft meant to make the rich even richer. Mozilla and Mistral can go eat a bag of dicks.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't believe in IP, so that really doesn't bother me much. The problem is when information gets harvested from the public and suddenly becomes someone else's IP.

So not really theft, more like gatekeeping, but as it stands, its the same result: rich get richer, we can agree on that.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 6 points 4 days ago

I think that IP may be a good idea on paper, but as it stands it only benefits the powerful, as in "if I pirate content I risk having my life ruined, companies fed their LLMs with everything but the kitchen sink and nothing happened"

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Mozilla choosing Mistral for Firefox Smart Window feels like a rare AI partnership that actually fits the product. Privacy, zero data retention and multilingual models are a much better match for Firefox than turning the browser into another Big Tech AI funnel.

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why do you say privacy and zero data retention? Has there been any proof of this? What we have learned from the last few years of investigations is companies lie and lie and lie through their teeth about anything regarding privacy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ankkuli@sh.itjust.works 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why do almost all your comments sound like AI

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

IMO nothing in that comment sounds particularly AI generated.

[–] SpaceBishop@piefed.zip 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Maybe not AI, but that specific comment does read like marketing copy. Then again, there is that list of three in there. That, plus just sounding like marketing, it could be AI. But I also concede that we, people that is, think in patterns of threes, so that's not a strictly an AI behavior, but I can see how someone could reach that conclusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Because they are an AI simp

[–] strop@lemmy.ml 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I gotta admit, I don't really mind AI as long as it doesn't exist anywhere in any amount

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As long as this is opt-in (i.e. disabled by default), then sure. Otherwise, I'll just have to find a new browser.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] blackshirt@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

about:config

browser.ml.enable => false

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It doesn't say anything about how this works. "No data retention" suggests that data is going to a server that's processing it but then not retaining it. That's bad, this type of feature should run entirely on the client.

Also, there's a proprietary AI model doing the work, even if inference is in the client. It says "open weight" but that's like letting people download a program as a compiled binary, the exact opposite of what FOSS is supposed to mean. It's an open/free model only if the training data and algorithms are also public, not just the trained weights.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Issue is that local AI hog vram, are slow and small models. Or if you don't have a compatible GPU, it uses the CPU which is even slower.

If AI is the future, I really hope it's local, but with the equipment people have at home, local AIs are a non-starter.

IMO it's enough to justify not shipping those AI features at all but I guess that's where FF execs disagree.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago

AI inference is doable on home equipment. AI training is less feasible, but nobody builds their whole Debian distro from source either. It's enough that the source is available and you can rebuild any component if you want ot do so.

[–] mintiefresh@piefed.ca 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As long as it's easy to turn off, I'm okay with it.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s still code bloat. A lot of these new “features” should have been plug-ins.

[–] jnsgc@social.vivaldi.net 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

@reddig33 @mintiefresh I think a local translate is useful, better than sending it all to the web.

[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

This isn't about local translate, we already have it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 days ago (5 children)

The translation feature has been very useful, though it's not an LLM. Still a neural network though. Saves me from going to google translate when browsing websites in e.g Russian (drive2.ru or whatever turns up in google search every so often when looking up obscure information on some cars and european oils that bitog forums don't see as much).

It entirely depends on what the AI does and if it's opt-in, opt-out, or forced on you. Opt-in local AI with sensible features is actually a good thing IMO.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

tbh i would not mind it that much if its local LLM or if its opt-in (opt out as bare minimum)
i also wonder if they are gonna use this for the built-in translator (if you think about it technically most translator software are AI,DEEPL uses a hybrid between LLMS and NMT IIRC. )

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Mozilla can fuck right off with that forced ai horse shit.

Waterfox is the way.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›