this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
171 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

88098 readers
3505 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 50 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The registration is only available on Android for now and costs a one-time fee of $2.99. The fee is meant to make it financially infeasible for spammers to create thousands of accounts and ruin Signal's network.

The payment is currently only offered through Play Services, but more payment methods are planned for the future. This means that users who don't have Play Services, such as people running GrapheneOS without Sandboxed Google Play, won't be able to try the feature out just yet.

[–] bertlewirth@lemy.lol 4 points 5 hours ago

so now instead of just your phone number, now they have a LOT of other info about you. Makes sense. Privacy!

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 33 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

I'll happily pay when they accept either crypto or an envelope of cash. There is no way to separate electronic payments or transfers from my personal identity and I don't consider it usefully "private" to have any account directly traceable to that. Trust is a limited and increasingly valuable commodity, and I'm conserving mine.

That said, there's probably a decent opportunity for second hand, no-strings-attached accounts to now be legitimately purchased then laundered anonymously through an arbitrary middleman without having use burner accounts stolen from innocent people or created with stolen identities. So maybe that'll be an improvement for privacy. Privacy shouldn't have to be illegal or inconvenient (but of course they want it to be).

[–] lnxtx@sopuli.xyz 23 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And it's one-time payment.

[–] gankouskhan@bookwyr.me 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

My card is ready! When I can on graphene

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

… users who don't have Play Services, such as people running GrapheneOS without Sandboxed Google Play, won't be able to try the feature out just yet.

[–] gankouskhan@bookwyr.me 2 points 8 hours ago

Yeah? That's what I was saying. I'll pay when I can on graphene

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

Just yet is better than not at all, I think.

[–] artyom@piefed.social -3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What in the absolute fuck. Signal disappoints again.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago

Honestly it should be their highest priority to make shit available without Google spyware. It's truly stunning.

[–] MissingGhost@lemmy.ml 7 points 14 hours ago

How about an open source server implementation? How about federation of servers? This fixes nothing. I'm still on XMPP.

[–] Unglue1857@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Awesome. Tested and works great.

[–] muntedcrocodile@hilariouschaos.com 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I've said it before and I'll say it again:

Signal has so many red flags. You are required to have a phone number which is essentially ur real identity. They now have payments linked to real identities so much better. They used to federate with 3rd party servers but they killed that and all but wiped it from the internet. They try to shut down 3rd party clients. They don't provide reproducible builds so we can't trust the source. They received their initial funding from In-Q-Tel the CIA venture capital firm.

Every time someone tries to raise any of these issues they are immediately shut down and told that its all for a good reason and that we should trust it.

At minimum they have a full social graph of real identities with time-stamped message events. Sealed sender doesn't negate this as signal knows ur ip address when u give them a message. They also know the destination of that message as that isn't sealed. This is sufficient information to link sender and recipient and timestamp. That's assuming the unreproducible builds don't have backdoors.

It's all got a slightly fishy smell to it.

Tldr: If u want actual secure messaging u should consider SimpleX

[–] beep@piefed.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Olvid is another option.