this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2026
75 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

16638 readers
649 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

"We can choose again" makes it sound like they want to go back :D

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

It absolutely was a necessity, without parking spaces cars would have clogged the streets.

Now, I don't mean to defend the cars in this case, living in a European city and buying a car is and was dumb.

However we have been better att hiding parking spaces in underground or integrated building that are less bad than wasting that space for parking.

At the time the solution was needed, but times change and now there are far far better solutions.

[–] beaverlicioustree@thelemmy.club 7 points 29 minutes ago (1 children)

Trains and bicycles existed in 1976. No it wasnt a necessit

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 minute ago

You misunderstand me, it was needed to create a parking space where people lived, else people would just create their own spots all over.

I don't disagree with you, there absolutely were alternatives to the car even back then, but people kept buying cars, and it became a problem for the city government to deal with.

So they did what was needed.

Remember, France was and still is a democracy, and they had to solve the issue with a pressure of reelection looming.

Your argument ignores human nature, and selfishness is part of that.

[–] schnokobaer@feddit.org 8 points 59 minutes ago

No idea what the benefit is of deliberately misinterpreting such an obvious point. What caused the thing in the picture wasn't a necessity.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 3 points 13 minutes ago

Park & ride is a very popular thing back then, people from out of town with less access to public transport can just leave their car outside the city and ride a train in, it definitely isn't a necessity and it never was.