I'm keeping my eye on this one. I want a better AA app, and my hu is a chineae aftermarket one, so yeah
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2026
179 points (98.9% liked)
Android
34948 readers
45 users here now
DROID DOES
Welcome to the Android community on Lemmy. Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rules
1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.
2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.
4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.
5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.
6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.
7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.
8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.
Community Resources:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Ooooh, thats exciting!!
Thanks for sharing! ☺️
My one gripe with Android Auto currently is that you can't use a separate Bluetooth headset/mic with Google assistant. It makes the assistant useless for motorcycles unless the AA unit supports connecting a Cardo/Sena directly to it.
Confirmed it works on my head unit from 2015, but no audio at all
Submit a bug report with details about both your phone and head unit. Make sure to record logs and include those.
https://github.com/Benjamin-Wiegand/Flywheel/wiki/Troubleshooting#recording-logs
So...it's not working then?
Right!?
No AI use statement
I haven't seen any evidence that AI was used. I haven't really looked at the codebase, but the commit history looks like it was written by a human and nothing in the README or in the wiki stands out to me as AI generated.
At first glance the code also doesn't look ai generated to me. The formatting of code is a little weird in some places, but not in a way i usually see llms do it.
I also took a quick peek at the code. Looks distinctly human to me. I'm faced with AI code daily, while I still write my own code 97.89% by hand.
Always free to create your own alternative if you're after purity.
Who cares if it foes the job?
How long will it do the job? How well does it do the job?
Well it's a program, so as long as anything else?
I'm not sure how you'd even rate this. It works? So I guess as good as anything else that works?
Thats the thing. Fully ai generated code becomes a mess and has more chances to break in the long run or become very inefficient, thats just a given atm.
Ive seen projects flurish with ai because a senior dev looked over it, but ive seen projects go to hell because it was fully ai code with no control on quality and correctness.
It might work at one point, and be completely unusable the next.
Programming is more than just "it works" and if a project is successful or not in the long run also hinges if the code quality and architecture is maintained.
Just wanted to chip in as a senior dev and say that you're right.