this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
490 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

88199 readers
5073 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works 14 points 19 hours ago
[–] kingkong@lemmy.world 12 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

shittification of technology by the ai companies much less innovation much higher cost much higher inflation caused by ai NOT deflation as elon and trump promised by ai. more gas lighting more hot air. less and less productivity.

also raspberry pi is made for the DIY community else just buy a PC delusional doesn't even know what their product is and was built for. my how the new culture are so far away from its roots after getting popular. this is why never ever let them become too big to not care about their core like all fang stonks and nvda google meta apple microsoft amazon all need to be canceled culturally. have no loyalty to any of them unless they give much better prices and product the answer is no and lower your prices.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 11 points 23 hours ago

Google have an imei checker for their phones. Google.

You could check that it is real and active.

Raspberry pi could allow people to check their board model on their site to see if they are getting the right amount of RAM. They could devise a method to allow checking the correct RAM is attached and not a recovered stick off another board of the same size.

[–] kaidenshi@lemmy.world 171 points 1 day ago (16 children)

They've completely lost the plot. Raspberry Pi was founded on the principle of hacking, education, and doing more with less. It's their DNA, but now it's clear all they give a shit about is money. They are corporate garbage now, like so many other organizations in the FOSS community that gave up freedom and openness for the Almighty dollar (or pound in this case).

Eben Upton can suck my soldering iron.

I knew it was happening the second they mentioned "IPO". Company was cooked.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Is that BJ Blazcowicz?

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 201 points 1 day ago (7 children)

the measure is primarily intended to prevent third parties from buying lower-capacity boards, replacing their RAM with cheaper parts of uncertain origin and then reselling the modified hardware as a higher-capacity model. The company argues that such modified boards have not undergone its validation process and could subsequently generate support requests if unstable memory is blamed on the company.

The solution to this decidedly rare problem is authorized resellers, not an arbitrary block on a very technically demanding upgrade.

That's assuming this is the actual problem though. If the problem is actually "We want to make more money by charging extra for 'enthusiast models'" then this is the correct tactic to ensure that you aren't undercut by cheap labor.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 91 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Their excuse definitely smells like bullshit. It just seems they want to do the Apple thing of making sure they get the money for the upgrade, plus a premium. Except even Apple has a technical reason they don't allow upgrades, which Raspberry Pi doesn't.

Raspberry pi is public. They have a clear profit motive behind the upsell. Clear as day.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] robomuffin79@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] chewypoops@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, it sure is. It's a hobbyist product and they took away my ability to upgrade it. After 14 years of buying these boards, they decided now, during a global RAM shortage, to tighten the leash...

I can solder new RAM into my MacBook or Nvidia GPU, but Raspberry Pi is the first to implement physical locks preventing RAM upgrades. What a fucking joke.

[–] non_burglar@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I can solder new RAM into my MacBook or Nvidia GPU

You still have to extract and modify the bios to recognize and address the new ram in those cases, you can't just "drop in" more ram.

That's what's being locked down, here. Raspberry Pi devices used to not care if you did so because the firmware was open.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

might as well just buy a normal laptop(or something used) then or smth if i decide this restriction is not fine,
also RPI5 8gb ram for 150~ usd alone is not worth it anymore, 80 usd was fine.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Probably cheaper to buy a laptop than a smith.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gigaqps@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 18 points 1 day ago

I feel like raspberry has been backstabbing everyone for a while.

[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 day ago

Enshitification will continue until morale improves

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Another win for mini PCs. Pis priced themselves out of the market since pi4-pi5 imo

I can get a second hand mini pc or Optiplex for much cheaper, and with quick sync

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 90 points 1 day ago (5 children)

So do we own the pi that we bought or does Raspberry Pi?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 21 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This makes sense. Hear me out.

  1. A CM5 is a device designed to be embedded into other devices. I believe most of their sales come from just that- companies that make other things, and build a CM5 into them rather than design their own control board.

  2. As you go up through the model tiers, the price increases faster than the added price of memory. IE, if the 2gb one is $20, and the difference between a 2gb memory chip and an 8gb memory chip is $10, the 8gb unit isn't $30 it's $60. You pay RPi a premium for the high end products.

  3. Desoldering RAM off a production PCB is something no hobbyist is going to bother with. BUT, a company buying 10,000 of these to build into their product MIGHT find it cost effective to setup a production line to do so. And they could probably resell the 2gb chips.

Point being- while I don't like this, and I don't like the ideas it represents, I also understand why they are doing it. It's not about us, the hobbyists. It's about the manufacturers that build compute modules into their products.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

What's the problem with a company doing what they want with hardware they purchased and own?

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 2 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

In concept nothing. But do you also recognize a legitimate business model of selling multiple products at different price points, spaced out more than the different cost of production?

And speaking hypothetically with some stupid numbers is it your argument that they should be able to purchase the $20 product, add $10 of parts, and either use it or sell it as the $200 product?

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

In concept nothing. But do you also recognize a legitimate business model of selling multiple products at different price points, spaced out more than the different cost of production?

Yes of course, but if the spacing is too much then stuff like this starts to happen.

is it your argument that they should be able to purchase the $20 product, add $10 of parts, and either use it or sell it as the $200 product?

Yes, once I buy something it's mine to do with as I want. Obviously warranty may be void in some cases, but otherwise I own it.

If the market exists that is willing to buy it as a $200 product then Raspberry Pi should sell them for that price, their costs would be much lower than someone who buys a Pi at retail, buys new RAM chips, spends the time to desolder and solder on the new RAM chips, market their 'product', and deal with shipping it. If the knockoff is $200 and the same-spec legitimate Pi with warranty is $200, the knockoff won't be around for long.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frigge@lemmy.ml 58 points 1 day ago (10 children)

enshitification always makes sense. Hear me out.

  1. Company needs to make more money
[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Governance

The Raspberry Pi Foundation is governed by a Board of Trustees that is responsible for ensuring that we use our resources effectively to achieve our charitable goals.

It seems the Trustees can't be trusted

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] carrylex@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Desoldering RAM off a production PCB is something no hobbyist is going to bother with

Ever heard of "repair" when no original spare parts are available?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

According to the article you can still do this. It's just you can't replace a 2 GB with an 8 GB because the board will still only recognize 2GB of that chip.

This is to prevent the resellers from buying 2 GB boards for cheap, replacing them with cheap 8 GB chips, and then reselling them for just under retail of the official 8 GB boards.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The article also states that you likely can't use just any compatible chip, the part number is baked into the board, so you might not even be able to swap out a 2GB SK Hynix with a 2GB Samsung chip

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

it does not say part number is baked in. it says parameters are baked in (latencies, frequency), and so chips with a different part number might not work.

load more comments
view more: next ›