this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2026
450 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

16670 readers
1352 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Imagine the new residential and commercial opportunities (and taxes) along that rail as well. Oh well, will never happen as long as republicans are alive and voting.

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

It would make less money doing the same amount of work, and in America we only want to generate value for the share holder.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

This is doable, we just have to convince our leaders is bad for the environment, will hurt brown people, will get them filthy rich and also paint them fake gold and put Drumpfs name on each train

So yea, no,

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dkppunk@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago

I don’t even care if we built high speed trains that go that fast in the US. I just wish our rail system was more extensive and prioritized passenger trains over freight trains, which they are required to by law but isn’t enforced.

[–] Novak@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

I didn't even know that was an option, but don't want to get my expectations up.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The current Lake Shore Limited route is 1,543 km. Doing that in 2.5 hours requires an average speed of 617 km/hr. At TGV top speeds of 320 km/hr it is a 4.8 hour trip.

As far as I know, 600 km/hr requires the development of additional technology not in operational use in other countries.

[–] ShyFae@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

I believe...

The US economy is based on spending as much possible as a consumer. Rather than focusing on infrastructure to improve livelihood, the aim is have endless construction and maintenance for as many people as possible. Everybody needs a car, or else you cannot safely travel(in the normal-ass suburbs where I grew up it was an hour walk to the grocery store, few pedestrian crossings for highways, and there plenty of sidewalks that simply ended due to gated communities or neighboring towns or villages that simply didn't to build some twords there edges). Each car will need to be taxed, registered, sold, bought, insured, fixed, fueled, towed, fined, accessorised, and finally scrapped and sold again in peices. If there was good public transportation, then less money would be changing hands, and the economy would look less impressive..

I don't think that was original reason, but I'm certain it's on the minds of modern economists now

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

Lot of people have car brain real bad in the US.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 3 hours ago

They would put in the airport hassle.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›