this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2026
1807 points (99.6% liked)

Fediverse

44100 readers
2272 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mastodon toot:

Daniel Lakeland @dlakelan@mastodon.sdf.org

Fediverse, the social media system for 40+ year old people who built the world wide web and regret it.

Oct 01, 2026, 11:32 PM

(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Plum@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago
[–] LeighWeighTacoma@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Damn bro I'm not 40 yet. We age fast enough, don't rush it lol

[–] X@piefed.world 8 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Got my start in the 14.4 days.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 4 points 13 hours ago

I went from a 1200 baud to a 28.8. It was like driving a supercar at the time.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Wow, I couldn't even hold my head up at 14.4 days.

[–] orbital@infosec.pub 2 points 14 hours ago

Same here! The family computer's first modem was 14.4Kbps. The sound of it connecting is burned into my memory.

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 9 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

How dare you accuse me of contributing anything other than shitposts to the world wide web.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago

Shitposts are the cornerstone of the internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Yeah this one Cuts deep

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

im over 50 and lee is way older than I. Granted www was just being born when I was in college.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

No shame in getting your freak on in telnet chat rooms or NNTP newsgroups.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago

one reason I liked reddit was it felt a bit more like alt. rec. newsgroups. the federation of course made it way better.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

🔘I’m in this meme and I don’t like it

(Sorry for everything.)

[–] JoeBidet@lemmy.ml 7 points 16 hours ago

see you on Reticulum!

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 15 hours ago

I feel seent.

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

That's my people.

[–] despoticruin@anarchist.nexus 3 points 13 hours ago

Why'd you have to call me out like that?

[–] QueenFern@lemmy.zip 5 points 16 hours ago
[–] xSikes@feddit.online 4 points 15 hours ago

That’s fair

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

I like the Web.

I don't like all of the websites out there and avoid using some, but I think that that was always going to be the case.

I guess that maybe it's a little surprising that there was the degree of consolidation that there was among the broader population into use of some specific websites. But...well, network effect applies to social media, so you'd expect at least some natural tendency in that direction.

considers

I guess that the degree of shift to social media as a whole is surprising to me. Like, most really important websites are social media websites. But, well, I'd always used social media myself, even prior to the term being coined, so the idea that others might want to use it doesn't seem that strange. BBSes, Usenet. I wasn't a user of The WELL, but there's another influential forum.

And a shift to Web-based social media was predicted. Those of us who were around probably remember use of the term "Web 2.0":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0

Web 2.0 (also known as participative, participatory,[1] web and social web)[2] refers to websites that emphasize user-generated content, ease of use, participatory culture, and interoperability (i.e., compatibility with other products, systems, and devices) for end users.

The term was coined by Darcy DiNucci in 1999[3] and later popularized by Tim O'Reilly and Dale Dougherty at the first Web 2.0 Conference in 2004.[4][5][6] Although the term mimics the numbering of software versions, it does not denote a formal change in the nature of the World Wide Web;[7] the term merely describes a general change that occurred during this period as interactive websites proliferated and came to overshadow the older, more static websites of the original Web.[2]

A Web 2.0 website allows users to interact and collaborate through social media dialogue as creators of user-generated content in a virtual community. This contrasts the first generation of Web 1.0-era websites where people were limited to passively viewing content. Examples of Web 2.0 features include social networking sites or social media sites (e.g., Facebook), blogs, wikis, folksonomies ("tagging" keywords on websites and links), video sharing sites (e.g., YouTube), image sharing sites (e.g., Flickr), hosted services, Web applications ("apps"), collaborative consumption platforms, and mashup applications.

Whether Web 2.0 is substantially different from prior Web technologies has been challenged by World Wide Web inventor Tim Berners-Lee, who describes the term as jargon.[8] His original vision of the Web was "a collaborative medium, a place where we [could] all meet and read and write".[9][10] On the other hand, the term Semantic Web (sometimes referred to as Web 3.0)[11] was coined by Berners-Lee to refer to a web of content where the meaning can be processed by machines.[12]

By Berners-Lee's statement there, he always expected the Web to have a social aspect.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›