1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Algorithm shuffle is garbage.
2026, and I’m still using iTunes and actual music files loaded on my phone.
It actually shuffles, plays everything in a playlist exactly once, reshuffles everything, and does it again.
Earlier this year I moved away from Youtube Music (was using the Morphe version of course). Ripped all my CDs to mp3 and FLACs. Got Fooyin on my computer and Foobar on my phone. Enjoying everything about it lol. Even the tedious task of ripping the music, setting the tags and filenames properly.
I also played around a bit with some music players that allowed for the good ol' WinAmp skins. Was very nostalgic. But after the nostalgia had burned off, Fooyin was the player of choice.
I've heard Amazon music will only shuffle through blocks of 500 songs at a time. So for my 700 song playlist, if I start with the first song on the list and hit Random, it will only shuffle the first 500 songs. But if I choose a song above number 200, it will be able to shuffle through all 700 songs supposedly.
I haven't tried this out myself, but it would explain why I never hear the newest songs on my playlist when I shuffle.
It's been years since I dabbled with programming, but how hard can it be for these music app developers to make a random list of your songs, and pop every played song from the list until it's empty and then repeat.
This dude (famous for "do you guys not have phones?") actually has a pretty good YouTube series on interesting ways to tackle programming challenges. He's got one on randomness that I thought was pretty cool: https://youtu.be/2anY9ICA-Pg
You wouldn't even need to pop songs off the list, just shuffle, go through the playlist, shuffle then restart the playlist.
But the music app developers aren't trying to give you true randomness. They're using machine learning algorithms to try and guess what you really want.
Nothing does what it says it does anymore, everything's trying to second guess you. I hate it.
I remember reading decades ago how music player devs would implement proper random playback and people would complain that it's not really random because it played the same song second time soon after the first. So the devs had to change it and make it less random...
Thats why some players have "random" and "shuffle".
Random is truly random, it might play the same two songs multiple times back to back. Highly unlikely, but it might.
Shuffle has a thing built in that avoids a song if it has been played within X amount of time or plays. Some shuffles might have other criteria as well.
The algorithm the grandparent comment suggests is equally random. It's just that it's a random sequence rather than a random selection.
I remember reading this about the iPod, where they programed it to not play the same artist multiple times in a row or within certain number of songs of each other.
Previous comment wants random order not fully random
MPD will do that if you enable the 'consume' option.
Uuuh, "MPD for Android APK can be installed from F-Droid", nice.
Pretty sure that's how most of them work...?
It's a single function call to randomize the order of a list in most randomization libraries. The hardest part would be to persist this randomized list across program restarts, and it's not hard either.
Unfortunately, not Plex. Plex has the absolute worst fucking shuffle mechanism I have ever used in my entire fucking life. It will literally play things in the exact same order multiple times in a row like days later. And in the Plexamp app, it will literally not play past like the fourth track on any album.
I don't think any of the ones I used are truly random, or there's something else going on. I often just randomize my whole music library and it's always pretty samey. It's often the same songs coming up even though I have 100s and I know for a fact there's songs that have never come up.
I bet it's possible to make a function that given a song in a list it returns the next song (or previous) in such a way that it's random but for a given song the previous/next one are always the same, depending on some parameter. That way the only two things the program has to remember is the current song and the parameter used to compute the next one. Then each time shuffle is enabled a new "seed" parameter is rolled.
I'm not sure how you would ensure that the songs only show up once in that list, unless you do weird shit like re-rolling the seed until you find one where this happens to be true.
But also, that's a lot harder than just storing the shuffled list. 😅
You don't have to do anything fancy, I don't think. Initialise your RNG with the seed that you have stored, shuffle the list, and then rotate the list to get to the 'first song'. Every RNG seed will give a correct result.
If you shuffle using eg. Durstenfeld/Knuth shuffle, which is O(n), then you can make a note of the 'first song's position' and do the rotation at the end of shuffling straight to the first song, in a single pass.
You'll still get a repeatable ordering if songs are added or removed from the playlist - the order will be different, of course - and it takes a lot less storage to write down the seed and the ID of the 'first song', which might matter if you're using a crappy old music player with very limited storage space.
Ah yeah, very good point. Their description didn't have me thinking of this kind of solution, but yeah, that should work.
What is it with streaming playlist mixes that causes them to only play the last dozen or so songs, anyway? I add ONE instrumental song to my liked tracks and suddenly it's all Polyphia and Nito.
They prioritize songs in your cache. That way they reduce their infrastructure costs. On Spotify at least clearing your cache can force it to give you something different.
Of course there's some self-serving reason for it. I should've known!
I assume it does this so you don't skip songs and cause them to have to pay more royalties? The songs you never skip get more preference when "randomly" making the playlist.
Is it an old person thing that I listen to entire albums instead of shuffling tracks?
I have periods of doing both. Last few months I've only listened to full albums. But I also do that with the "shuffle albums on playlist" setting. So I don't particularly choose which album to listen, most of the time I just accept what comes next, sometimes I skip album or two.
But I feel like I'm about to change to the "shuffle tracks on playlist" soon-ish.
yep. probably.
I cant do that. just using revanced or morphe and use ad-less youtube music.
I had just gotten Google music to reliably stop doing this when they shut the service down. I've been disappointed with every music service since. I don't have the time to go download thousands of songs, as much as I'd like to. I've gotten really in to podcasts and audiobooks as a result
I’m still pissed at Google for buying and then killing rather than integrating Songza. The only thing we kinda got from that was the moods radio in Google music.
I use spicetify for spotify. There is a shuffle+ addon which adds a truly random shuffle mode.
Truly random 😅
Yeah I know, I don't believe there is such a thing as true randomness. But I wasn't gonna write a paragraphs debate about that. You know what I meant. 🤣
I know, I know. It's just funny because not only nothing on computer is truly random, the "truly random" option is probably less random then the normal one.