Linux

19463 readers

282 users here now

Welcome to c/linux!

Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!

Rules:

Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
No NSFW adult content
Follow general lemmy guidelines.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

warmaster@lemmy.world

Bitwarden Switches to Commercial License (community.bitwarden.com)

submitted 18 hours ago by Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club to c/linux@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

RyanL Bitwarden Employee

Hello everyone!

Starting in the next release, the Bitwarden apps published to the various stores will be the commercially licensed builds. No action is needed, and the apps will work exactly as they do today.
Bitwarden remains committed to open source security and transparency
The GPLv3 OSS licensed version continues to be updated and published on GitHub
All current features are available in both versions
License details are on GitHub
Bitwarden remains committed to a robust, free forever plan for everyone
If you have any questions, please ask them in this thread. Thanks all!

EDIT:
Bitwarden is not going closed-source
You can still fork Bitwarden
No change to self-hosting, the licensing change affects those who are repackaging and reselling Bitwarden
The free plan is here to stay permanently

all 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Damn it, back to KeepassXC I guess.

[–] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 4 points 5 hours ago

Yeah I've not really enjoyed my attempts with syncthing so I'm not thrilled about this.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

So how does this affect someone like my situation I have the software installed on iOS and a few androids and a Linux. I have them all syncing using Bitwarden’s server (I know, I’m gonna change to self-hosted eventually). Do I have to find a new platform for my passwords?

[–] x1gma@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It doesn't, since you're not repackaging or reselling. It's classical FUD as it is with any other license change in popular software. There already is a subscription. You already need the subscription for features even if you self host. The moment bitwarden pulls anything too greedy or suspicious there will be hard forks, and since vaultwarden already exists as a drop-in replacement for the official server, the API is well-known, those forks would be a massive problem for bitwarden as a company. Realistically, the single question is the same as it's been before the announcement: do you want to pay for comfort and to fund further official development, then go for bitwarden, or to use vaultwarden and self host it, and get more free features on your infra. OSS projects can pull fucky shit too, and die just like any other commercial product. You gotta trust someone.

[–] AndrewZabar@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Preaching to the choir buddy, I am a FOSS fan and pretty much everything I run is free and open-source. Thanks for the info, I appreciate it.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 0 points 12 hours ago

They just don't want to make double the builds for everything.

[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 8 points 17 hours ago

Yeeeaaah … now I have to found another password vault for my IPhone