this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
260 points (93.6% liked)

Technology

73232 readers
4312 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] percent@infosec.pub 35 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

Kinda wild that app stores allow something like that. I wonder how long it'll take for someone to build the same up, but with the roles reversed: Men anonymously talking about local women 😬

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Of course they would. It's only allowed as long as the genders aren't flipped.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] apex32@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 26 points 19 hours ago

There's no way a libel database could be a bad business model

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feyd@programming.dev 209 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oh great another centralized repository of data about people (uploaded without their knowledge or consent in the case of the men) that definitely won't be abused by bad actors

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 182 points 1 day ago (5 children)
[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 23 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

It's even mentioned at the top of the linked article.

Tea, which topped the Apple App Store charts this week β€” shortly before the app was hacked.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 51 points 1 day ago

This post is directly under a post about the breach in my feed.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 34 points 1 day ago

Oooooooooof

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago

Saw that coming.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hunnybubny@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 23 hours ago

This is psychotic.

[–] simplejack@lemmy.world 96 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Someone saw that Black Mirror episode and said β€œLet’s make that for real.”

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you mean that Community episode.

[–] ksigley@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago

Creating a digital social hierarchy was on my 2030 bingo card... dang.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 125 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Huh...

Part of these types of things generally seem like a well-intentioned idea, but it's also so creepy, scammy, and gross. This data won't stop here by any means, and will be sold or used in a million different even shittier ways. Pretty fucked.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 129 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Gork@sopuli.xyz 48 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Don't these companies know how to properly configure a database? This seemed like it was completely preventable.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 16 hours ago

Starting salary for a cyber security expert is around 70,000€ and that's for someone who's relatively inexperienced so you would probably want to pay more like 90,000€, for these startups that's seven or eight employees worth of salary and they don't want to pay it.

The problem is it leads to things like this happening which kills their entire company.

Or they could do what they're doing now which is work with a consultancy company which doesn't cost anywhere near as much money but still costs quite a bit.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 day ago

Lots of breaches are entirely preventable, but lots of companies don't like to pay for qualified employees that could prevent them.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago

They don't care. It's not their information and there are no consequences.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

yeah, well-intentioned things tend to go sour when exposed to the glow of anonymity on the internet. Starts off innocent, and goes downhill fast.

The creator, Sean, stating that he started this app as a reaction to the online dating scene his mother experienced, seems fine: an anti-catfishing app would be great.

To give the devil their due, the data they collect might also be valuable as data on how women discuss men online, which at a cursory glance seems to favor far more hyperbole than I see in everyday life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] socialsecurity@piefed.social 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no way this would get abused by threat actors and mentally unstable types!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago (2 children)

β€œHe’s a cheater,” Walker said, reading some of the comments on one post out loud.

"What clubs does he go to?" another person asked on a different post. "He’s cute."

That illustrates the big problem...

Some guys are lying assholes and horrible people, but so are some women.

It's not going to take long for them to get massively sued, there's no way they're vetting the posted info, and it's literally cyber bullying.

The guy (yes it's a guy) who made and owns this is a fucking idiot for not seeing the lawsuits coming.

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Some guys are lying assholes and horrible people, but so are some women.

and some guys anonymously posing as women online to undermine the competition.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Lol, reminds me of a different thread about trump pretending to be a woman and writing into newspapers:

β€œBased on the fact that I work for Donald Trump as his secretaryβ€”and therefore know him wellβ€”I think he treats women with great respect, contrary to what Julie Baumgold implied in her article … I do not believe any man in America gets more calls from women wanting to see him, meet him, or go out with him. The most beautiful women, the most successful womenβ€”all women love Donald Trump.”

Carolin Gallego December 7, 1992. (Not a realperson)

https://mashable.com/article/donald-trump-carolin-gallego-new-york-magazine-letter

[–] nulluser@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

JFC, as if this guy wasn't already the poster child for cringe.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Posted yesterday about how he was the late night show's favorite target back in the day. FFS, does no one remember Trump: The Board Game! Or when he insisted everyone refer to him as "The Donald"?

Here's Obama tearing him a new asshole:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHckZCxdRkA

And that's how we got President Trump!

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Also he wrote then like AI writes now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

Outside of the crap going on in the US fascist resurgence, women are generally defined as a minority that requires equity / special benefits and protections. Making an app to "protect women" by crowdsourcing information about potentially predatory / negative men is viewed as 'good', and would likely be 'ok' by many western country standards.

Making an app about women, with similar 'experiences' reported by guys, would be considered predatory, and would get shut down.

We can already see plenty of related things out and about -- like "women only" companies getting applauded by govt / media, while the same sources shame any business that doesn't attempt to get 50%+ women on staff. We shut down gentlemen's clubs for being discriminatory, but we cheer women's only spaces. Genders are not treated equally in the public's eye, and it generally skews in favour of benefiting women at this point, especially once it hits media/govt/courts.

I think this is the more realistic take on how it'd play out.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a weird place some societies have come to.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Using technology as a surrogate for community.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If I was going to make something like this, it would have to incorporate trust chains. I don't care if some maga-hat says this lady is horrible. I care if my good friend Alex says she's horrible. One person's "this person won't shut up about communism" is a big red flag (no pun intended) but for someone else that's the dream.

When you sign up, you'd need to be referred to someone or be a root node. Anyone connected to you can be weighted differently. If some section of the tree is misbehaving, prune it.

But that's a lot of work

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Same thing should be done with product reviews, and social media comments, etc., etc.

Really if someone makes a robust way to have a trust chain that integrates into the Internet at large, that would prevent a whole universe of problems we have in modern society.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yardratianSoma@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

I like where you're going with this!

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Friendly reminder that Facebook started as FaceMash, an app for men at Harvard to rate the attractiveness of women.

Both are bad. At least these women are nominally using it for safety and not just looks rating.

Finally, I would be really darn cautious of using any app like FaceMash or Tea. Seems like a great way to get sued for defamation. Or to become the target of escalated behavior of one of the bad ones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Thank God we have the GDPR in Europe.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

People should bombard them with DSAR requests.

If you’re in a state that support data subject removal requests, like California, email support@teatheapp.com and say this is a formal DSAR request to remove all of your PII.

They have 45 days to follow through.

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί