this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2025
292 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

73232 readers
4259 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What a weird place some societies have come to.

Using technology as a surrogate for community.

[–] Vanth@reddthat.com 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Friendly reminder that Facebook started as FaceMash, an app for men at Harvard to rate the attractiveness of women.

Both are bad. At least these women are nominally using it for safety and not just looks rating.

Finally, I would be really darn cautious of using any app like FaceMash or Tea. Seems like a great way to get sued for defamation. Or to become the target of escalated behavior of one of the bad ones.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I know one of the false electors from the 2020 election. They met their wife on Hot or Not.

[–] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thank God we have the GDPR in Europe.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Many states in the US have similar regulations. For example, California’s regulations are famously similar to GDPR.

[–] zarathustra0@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I imagine there are whatsapp groups for things like this.

But I'm going to pretend they don't exist because I already feel self-conscious enough.

[–] brot@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If you think about it: The GDPR applies to all data of EU citizens regardless of where they are or where you are. There is no way that this app is not having some EU guy in New York in it and therefore totally in violation of GDPR

[–] semperverus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

The treaties and international laws between these countries absolutely allow the EU to enforce GDPR against companies and individuals outside of the EU if it involves an EU citizen as the victim. I know this because I have to work with it every day and I'm from the US.

[–] homura1650@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

And what is the EU going to do about it? Governing bodies can declare extraterritorial laws all they want, but they are meaningless unless they have a way to enforce them.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No European law applies outside Europe. That's kind of the nature of laws.

That’s the big part of what makes GDPR so wide-reaching and impactful. It protects European residents, not European IP addresses. If you’re a resident of Europe, you’re covered under GDPR. Even if you’re visiting the US. That’s why even Americans get GDPR questions when visiting sites, because the site can’t just filter by IP location to determine whether or not you need to be shown the GDPR prompt.

Enforcement can be trickier, sure. But to be clear, GDPR does cover non-European companies as long as they’re interacting with a European resident.

[–] hunnybubny@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Wrong. US citizen while in EU falls under GDPR. EU citizen while anywhere outside of EU falls under GDPR.

It is up to EU to enforce it.

That's kind of the nature of laws.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

People should bombard them with DSAR requests.

If you’re in a state that support data subject removal requests, like California, email support@teatheapp.com and say this is a formal DSAR request to remove all of your PII.

They have 45 days to follow through.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

This is a nightmare. Some mentally deficient vigilante with delusions of grandeur and a fist full of painkillers would use this as a hit list.
.

[–] m3t00@piefed.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

viral aka. gossip. some can't get enough

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So how this app work? Women take pics of men they see in public then rate them? Can someone explain how this keeps women safe?

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

More like women can create a profile for men in their lives, and other women can share their experiences with that man. It’s sort of a publicly sourced Burn Book. It was apparently started because the creator’s mom had some bad dating experience, and basically lamented about how there wasn’t a good way for women to share stories about the men they’ve dated. Like “wouldn’t it be nice if women could stick red flags to a dude, to warn his potential partners in the future?”

So if a dude is an abuser, his victims can create a profile for him, where other women can share their experiences too. If a dude cheats, he can be put on blast for other women to see. It’s basically an “is anyone else dating this man” local Facebook group, but much larger and more in-depth.

There are some ethical concerns about it, especially regarding potential abuse; There’s nothing stopping an abusive woman from wrecking her ex’s future dating life by lying about him. But the women using the app basically say that the potential safety in dating outweighs the potential for abuse.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

“wouldn’t it be nice if women could stick red flags to a dude, to warn his potential partners in the future?”

Nope. Personal bias and people change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AceSLive@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I have no personal experience with the app at all, so what I am about to say comes from things I heard, or inferences I've made about the app - but...

I see the merit of an app like this for keeping people safe, but have no idea how it could be used without any possibility of it being abused.

On the face of it all, basically, if a man is abusive or in any way dangerous, or raises "red flags" for women, this app can help other women be aware. Lots of narcissistic assholes come across as lovely people at the start, but by the end are abusive people. My wifes ex husband, is one example, of a psychopathic narcissist. If only we could utilise an app like this to let other women know just who he is, and what to watch out for...

On the other side of it, of course, it's all too easy to say someone is abusive or dangerous to defame or isolate that person. Women have the ability to be just as abusive as men. An abusive woman may use this app to make other women in their community scared of/avoidant of a man who isn't in any way a danger to anyone.

Basically, my understanding of the app is that it allows women to give information about men they know and have dated, so other women can get a sort of background check on said men

But this, of course, could easily be misused and abused.

The app also required photo ID to prove you were a woman using the app, which recently was breached and ALL of the ID that was submitted is now viewable by anyone. So... yeah

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 7 points 1 day ago

Intrusive permissions/data collection/sharing, including location.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›