this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
960 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

88825 readers
3026 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rozodru@piefed.world 79 points 15 hours ago (22 children)

and this is why I'm retiring in two weeks. They don't get it, they never will. my work as a contractor trying to code review their slop and telling them what they needed to change fell on deaf ears. they cut me a cheque, thanked me for my time, and it was onto the next company/startup to perform the same song and dance.

i'm done. I'm done with the tech industry. 25 years just poof, gone. I'm in my mid 40s, i'm single, i own my condo, i'm done. I'm going to sit on my ass all day, play videogames, and clear out my codeberg and delete everything. I'm not even going to work on FOSS stuff anymore, i'm not going to maintain anything, I'm not going to contribute. I'm done. I want nothing to do with this crap.

[–] AliOski@feddit.nl -1 points 3 hours ago

Make sure your retirement is not in the hands of any banks or retirement funds.

They will all go belly up in case the bubble bursts.

[–] brave_lemmywinks@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

Man so envious of that, I'm just a bit younger and I can't retire like that.

I will be sailing my job until they fire me. Don't know what will happen next but maybe I can find something that's more down to earth with my local community and still brings some joy.

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago

good ending, took too long maybe

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Congrats on your retirement!, I also just pulled the trigger myself. I think industry managers will need to see AI fail for a few years before they wake the eff up around where to use it and how to control it. Its like we are using horse reins on cars lately. The problem is that AI makes very compelling demos. It lets you fill in the blanks with what looks like an instant, high functioning product. You dont initially see the long tail of mediocrity and imprecision. We are used to just assuming tech products are consistent, endlessly iterable, and user friendly.

It is useful, I'll give it that. But.. we are barely doing code reviews anymore though, which is terrifying. Exec says invest in extra scoping an extra testing, and ignore the software creation part, let AI do its thing and trust it. May work. May not. My replacement will find out, poor bastard. Good luck to them.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 20 points 14 hours ago

I "retired" (fancy way of saying "was laid off") from programming seven years ago and I haven't written a line of code since. I'm happy to have completely missed out on the AI experience, although since I spent the last few years of my career mostly managing a team of offshore developers, I feel like I got close enough. Now I own my own small house and I drive a school bus and I couldn't be happier. At some point AI will be driving the school buses (so that the kids can still go to school and have AI do all their work for them) but hopefully I will have died a painless death by then.

[–] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Fair. I have been a Linux hobbyist for decades. Up until being replaced by AI a year or two ago, I worked tech support and tech billing/contract roles for infrastructure and software giants. I have zero interest in perpetuating purportedly legal but sketchy billing schemes, using or selling AI, or enabling any foreign (or local) genocides or surveillance states with my work. I'd rather make less money and have my ethics a little less shattered.

The main reasons I work are to learn new skills and to get health insurance and money. I can learn skills on my own, I'm doing okay on money because my hobbies are mostly free or pay me a little bit. It's mostly the threat of financial destitution, homelessness, and dying in a gutter because I caught a cold without health insurance that have kept me working full time, even when my freelancing was a big portion of my income. If we can solve the healthcare issue, everything will change for the better. I truly believe that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] redditStinksSuperBad@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

man i'm like a couple years behind ya. could you tell me the ballpark of what you're retiring on so i can be envious :D

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Take how much you spend in a typical year and multiply by 25. Pre-trump conventional wisdom theorized that you need that much, and you cant count the money you lock into the house you will live in, unless you plan to sell it when you need to and pay rent.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] TuringCompleteSocialist@lemmy.world 39 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Can't wait to see this exact headline another 50 times but none of the companies in question facing any consequences for their actions, profit driven society is so fucking stupid.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 14 hours ago

The consequence is that they waste money and time. Which actually matters for businesses strapped for money or time. But most of the megacorps are swimming in money and in time. They waste those all the time even without the AI because the upper management accepts kickbacks to contract with the worst (but also the bribiest) contractors. And mid management, and everyone else, put their own personal interests ahead of the company's. Now that the AI hype is here, they have a new tool to waste time and money with, but nothing has fundamentally changed. Big business is a lumbering inefficient bureaucracy by its nature.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 17 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

No no no. Most companies already knew this. Most bosses just pretended it wasn't happening so they could ride the bubble and bonus themselves... We all said this was what would happen, and it did happen, and only complete suckers would still have fallen for it. Of course some CEOs are suckers, but many of them are simply greedy.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

We all said this was what would happen

They only listen to people who's wage or billable hours are close to the order of magnitude as their own.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 14 hours ago

You mean malicious compliance works for the mid management too? I believe it.

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 35 points 17 hours ago (6 children)

I tried AI-everything (apart from code review of course). But it's just too hard. Letting the AI do bigger things results in subtle, hard to find, but devastating design fails and errors. It's fractal. No matter what layer I look at, it's always sort-of working but also bugged in subtle and sometimes hard-to-fix ways.
So I don't do that. Instead I use the AI as an assistant while I still do most of the actual work. I downgraded my account too because I never reached the limits for a while.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 23 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Ding ding ding. It's fucking GREAT for eliminating the menial bullshit like scaffolding, data cleanup, sifting through overly verbose documentation... Anything that requires abstract thought still needs to be done by a human.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sanzky@lemmy.world 65 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

they cut our copilot budget to 19€ per person (you can request more. but of course it’s a hassle)

they still insist AI the future and more AI is better. they are just now shifting the blame to employees: “you need to think more about how you use it”, “you cannot just throw tokens at a problem”, etc

two months ago I got an email from a manager asking me why my AI spending was so low.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

sounds like they are creating another excuse for another round layoffs.

[–] sanzky@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

they are already in the middle of one. (huge It consulting company)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] r0ertel@lemmy.world 43 points 18 hours ago

Wait, we're not tokenmaxing anymore? So when the AI salesman said to make a leaderboard of people spening the hardest, it was to line their own pockets with cash? Huh. Color me surprised.

So next, you'll tell me that it costs more to have an LLM produce the same quality of code as a senior developer.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 56 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

At our company, 12 months ago they said everyone wasn't using enough AI. They even made a leaderboard to see who was using the most tokens in the business and encouraged more and more.

A couple of months ago, everyone's AI spend was restricted to $100/month without warning. Entire workflows broken overnight because people had built theirs around Claude skills that used stupid amounts of tokens.

Now they're starting layoffs. Go figure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] butsbutts@lemmy.ml 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think he's waiting for someone to insert a penis into his mouth

[–] TownhouseGloryHole@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 41 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

This just in, Management are complete morons. Film at 11.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Quazatron@lemmy.world 122 points 22 hours ago (13 children)

January: We're going AI native, please use AI as much as possible.

March: Everyone needs to attend workshops on how to maximize AI productivity.

July: Some models are only available for special (properly justified) cases. Speak to your manager. Turns out that some people did everything (even commits) with top cost models.

August: Ok, we're setting some limits on token usage, due to some people spending 1000% over the average.

September: we are creating additional frameworks and limits to AI use.

It took a bit of time for the actual AI cost/benefit to reach the top management and put some hard numbers in contrast with the hype machine, but it's happening.

[–] doctordevice@lemmy.ca 45 points 20 hours ago (14 children)

Everyone who was paying attention even a little bit has known this would be the trajectory from the beginning. And we haven't even gotten to the crazy price hikes per token that are coming.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] amgine@lemmy.world 49 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

My company is at the July stage. Who knew giving people unrestricted access to Claude enterpise with no training would blow through budgets in days

[–] Supercrunchy@programming.dev 7 points 8 hours ago

Our management is so "forward-looking" that we are still in the March stage: they want AI used everywhere, and added everywhere in the product.

Saying that sometimes you still need to use the brain for big decisions will make some people question your prompting skills publicly.

Hell, we even rebranded the whole company to be an """AI company""". I hate it there and I sense layoffs coming soon, but finding a job in this period is hard. Wish me luck.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 193 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Management spent two years demanding everyone use AI, then discovered everyone was using AI. Now they’re shocked the office is a conveyor belt of hallucinated PowerPoints reviewed by other bots. The real productivity breakthrough will be executives learning that buying subscriptions isn’t a business strategy.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 111 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Ernst and Young say 36% of companies using AI have experienced catastrophic incidents.

Hopefully some of them go bankrupt. That would be a stellar way to get rid of some bad management.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›