this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2026
66 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

16851 readers
1123 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Steve@communick.news 2 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

That sounds like plenty of time to me.
Though I believe, nearly all criminal sentences are shockingly too long, and punitive punishment is primitively barbaric.

[–] PlaidBaron@lemmy.world 1 points 14 minutes ago* (last edited 14 minutes ago) (1 children)

'Prmitively barbaric'. I have never heard a combination of words that so easily betrayed pseudo-intellectualism before. That's impressive.

[–] Steve@communick.news 1 points 11 minutes ago

What would be a better term?

[–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

i once watched a documentary about some of the most wanted criminal in japan. basically there's a guy thats been to prison. in there his cellmate told him that the easiest way to kill a person is just hit them with a car, because its so hard to prove the murder intent they just charge you with negligence.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

I think it would be a very bad idea for "lying to the authorities" to be a crime...

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Callaghan said Stechman, who was on a learner licence, had been aggressive from the start of his interaction with Huntsman, which was an aggravating feature of his offending.

He said Stechman drove up behind Huntsman tooting his horn, even though Huntsman had been cycling at around 58 kilometres per hour in the 50 zone.

There wasn't even any reason to overtake him, I'm sure it's the kind of guy that will tell you cyclists don't respect the rules

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 57 minutes ago

Huntsman had been cycling at around 58 kilometres per hour in the 50 zone

If that wasn't downhill, Huntsman was FAST! 😮

Sorry for the digression, but as an avid but slow long distance cyclist, I gotta give props where they're due 😁

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 14 points 1 hour ago

I went to court once because the morning after a party, I still blew just over 0.05.

While there, I saw a guy who had his lawyer dad there speaking for him. The guy was in stopped traffic, mounted a sidewalk, hit a child on their bicycle, and fled the scene, later telling his dad who called the police.

He got a 1 year suspension on his licence, no jail time, and fine like 900€. I remember hearing the person behind me say, "Fucking bullshit" as we waited for our turn.

In comparison, I got 300€ and a six month suspension, no record. I was told it would be worse, but it was clear that I was unaware that I may have still had alcohol in my system. Which is true, because I stopped and went to bed early, knowing I had to be up early to drive to the markets.

Apparently I could've also hit children and sped off the road to get around traffic for just 600€ more...

[–] brem@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Where I'm from, if you don't lie.. you can just drive away from it, if your car still works. True story :(

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago) (3 children)

Who decides if something is a lie or not

Edit: The comment made it sound like people could just drive away from the scene of the accident.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 55 minutes ago

Tom Hanks.

No idea why, that's just who they picked 🤷🏻

[–] brem@lemmy.world 0 points 56 minutes ago

Lies expose themselves? Have you not seen guilt wither the truth? It happens so much today. With enough time, a lie rots. Super easy to see. It's not immediately physical. But it does take a physical toll. On both those who see it and those who create it.

A lie is the opposite of truth. No judgement can change this decision. It exists, does it's damage, and then the truth comes along and mops the lie up..and we start over again.

[–] lntl@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

He looks awfully sorry tho