What a loser, Sam may know how to speak to investors, but he don't know how to speak to people.
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2026
544 points (93.5% liked)
Technology
89355 readers
3146 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Oh, but Zuck, Thiel and Musk certainly do. Totally no awkwardness with these shining beacons of social competence!
"CHAINSAW CHAINSAW!"
Easily one of the cringest moments in 2025. Video linked for anyone who still needs proof that money can buy a great many things, but coolness and authenticity are not among them.
What the fuck, that was the cringiest shit I have seen for a long while. I want to thank you stranger, but I also do not, since you exposed me to that! Lmao.
I want to say "I'm happy to help", but I'm not, and I haven't. So let's just sit here together in silence that is still orders of magnitude less socially awkward than... this.
Wow, he's even more of a loser in moving picture.
Also I didn't know his voice sounded like that. Every time I read his words I hear his voice as kinda nasally and helium-enriched. Is he artificially deepening his voice cause he thinks it sounds cooler?
Why do people care what these assholes say?
Pay attention to them only because they’re gonna tell you the shit they’re gonna try, but don’t listen to this bullshit.
They aren’t embracing it because it’s not good at solving novel problems which is generally why you need a thinking human in the position if any complexity is involved. If the problem was easy enough for AI to solve, employers tend to not have a person doing it anyway. The only service AI can replace was the self-service software already in place. I do see it being enormously helpful analyzing data but a person is still required to ensure inputs are thorough and accurate.
…but it’s not cool. May be interesting to some that may be in computer and/or science but that might be as far as it goes.
It is fucking amazing that people managing huge funds are prepared to throw money at complete fuckwits like this guy or that dumbarse Theranos lizard woman. If you have money clearly all you need to do is spout bullshit and roll a dice and you make more until you don't.
What I don't understand is why the fuck we elect people who suck up to these cunts. Like we have total control of who we vote for. And we still vote for door mats. What's with that?
Soooo AGI, when?
Gee Whizz, it's almost as if you should follow the customer and the customer is right. Yes, Gen Z likes old shit, that's why they actually are more punkish when it comes to taste.
The tapdancing monkey is desperate for attention. Don't feed the troll.
Articles suggest they already don't like your tech. Good job winning them over, pal.