this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
660 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

68684 readers
805 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] comradegodzilla@lemmy.ml 33 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Running my workstation and server on Debian stable. Debian always. Debian forever.

[–] Flatearth_Habeebi@lemmy.zip 24 points 6 days ago (14 children)

Amazing for a server. Both my servers run Debian and I have had no issues.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I run it with KDE for my daily driver & gaming and it is very boring and stable, which is what I want in my PC. Debian is 99% of the time supported.

I recommend it.

[–] Flatearth_Habeebi@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I’ve invested so much time and effort into CachyOS. I’ve been running it for over 2 years now. A switch would be very hard and unnecessary work for me since it works no issues for me. Otherwise, Debian would be on my machine.

[–] CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not only does cachy work perfectly, Debian needs so much fiddling around to get latest software versions it's a hindrance for a lot of stuff including gaming

[–] Flatearth_Habeebi@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

Gaming and getting the latest kernel is a big one for me. My gpu and cpu are very new and they require the latest kernels. I’m sure there are ways to bring in the newest kernel to Debian, or just use Sid or testing, but why do that and what I have works no problem?

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Makes sense. I started with Ubuntu so Debian was a very natural move for me

I tried a few non-debian distro but always came back to it as it is the one I am most familiar with.

[–] Slashme@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I run it on my daily driver laptop and I'm happy as a clam.

[–] Flatearth_Habeebi@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 days ago

I did run it for a couple of year in the past. It was solid.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, Debian is my favorite server software by a mile.

[–] debil@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, Debian is my favorite ~~server~~ software by a mile.

FTFY

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

What the fuck is a mile

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

Debian has become my favorite server OS. Some more specialized distros are great for specific use cases, but for 90% of my stuff, I just install Debian and chill.

[–] DannyMac@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Also, don't worry, Debian has plenty of Toy Story characters left for many years of releases to come!

[–] zemo@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

I surfed a few distros before landing on Debian. It solved (almost) all the issues I had with Linux. Debian for life.

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I only ever deploy and develop on Debian. Community run distros all the way. I had bad experiences with Redhat decades ago and do everything I can to avoid it or its siblings.

Debian has faults but it is often a taste thing. I like systems that give me upstream with minimal patches, like Arch. I moved to Arch on all desktops/laptops. The Debian devs repeatedly doing dumb shit with ssh patches was part of that. Arch is not unreliable but it is unstable. All that means is that software updates which aren't backwards compatible sometimes require intervention . To be clear that is not a fault with Arch but it does make it much less suitable for long hassle free server deployments. Also Arch doesn't have the Debian security announce list or maintain a stable production environment for years with backported security fixes and unnattended security updates.

[–] SsxChaos@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] mrnngglry@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago

It's not. Post is confusing.

[–] data1701d@startrek.website 5 points 6 days ago

No, not until 2027. I don't really know why this meme was posted at this exact moment.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 4 points 6 days ago

I really need one of these shirts

[–] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

DietPi, anyone? 🥹

load more comments
view more: next ›