This is a joke about face sitting.
Season 7 episode 21, Assie Come Home
What about the one where Fry sleeps with his own grandmother to become his own grandfather?
this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2026
429 points (99.5% liked)
Lemmy Shitpost
42819 readers
3797 users here now
Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.
Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means:
-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
1.Memes
10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)
Reach out to
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
lmfao
I should have gone with that one
Isn't this the same country that has a pedo prince, and ties to the biggest pedo ring in modern history? Something about a Seville too.....
It's also going to make that porn more popular. Media bans don't actually work because of how media demand works. Supply and demand don't naturally coordinate for media exchange, except by apply risk to non-paying recipients of media. That's how copyright works. If you apply risk to non-paying recipients for a different reason, economics doesn't care about your reason. Just that you applied risk. Risk applied to paying parties goes into a different part of the formula. The result is total demand goes up (cash changing hand motivating production), but it becomes sold as a contraban.
D = CV*min(1,FR/FV)-CR, F(free) V(value) R(risk) C(commercial)
Because these are all distributions. Subtracting the CR distribution from that more complex part never gives you a zero distribution. But if FR is uniformly zero, demand goes to zero. Once you introduce FR you open the window of coordination (modifier of CV) to be non-zero. Because copyright enforcement is lax for pornography, FR is basically zero now. But it's about to not be.
It's the same reason commercial production of CSAM increases.
Ok, bye.
There is some explanation missing before this makes sense. In which units is demand measured? In currency? In amounts of "media"? What is free risk supposed to mean? And what is commercial risk? And how can it be the same unit as free and commercial value, and demand? 1€ risk? How do you apply it? How can they be distributions? Are we talking about probability distributions? What if CV < CR argh... Where can I find answers?
load more comments
(2 replies)
I did a deep dive into this last week. Part of the confusion is because facesitting got banned a decade ago, in 2014. There was a protest where sex workers sat on faces outside Parliament and everyone sang Monty Python's Sit On My Face. The ban was overturned in 2020, then relitigated nowadays in 2026 when a new law banned suffocation. A popular porn website I've never heard of before last week said facesitting is suffocation, hence the current internet drama.
Folks, your face sitting is still perfectly legal, but you may have to go to court to argue it, because there's no precedent establishing it yet.
Not from the UK, what's this about. Can't sit on faces no more?
A new law that bans several kinks in porn is taking effect today.
Governmental kink shaming? Yikes.
Very British
I sometimes feel like the British authorities would ban sex altogether if they could find people some other way that would be willing to eat kidney pie.
When it comes to British culture, the thing I’m most hung up on is their definition of “pudding“. As an American, this is what “pudding“ means to me:
But when the British use the word “pudding“ I have absolutely no goddamn idea what they mean. I have been trying to figure it out for decades, immersing myself in British culture, and I am no closer to figuring it out than I was when I started.
Is it a car? A breed of cow? A 15th century poet? A sweet sausage meat pie made with a crispy crust? A Welsh slur for immigrants? A sex act that was popular during the Victorian era? I have no fucking idea…
As another 'Murican, the way I understand it is that if it's boiled or steamed inside of an animal intestine or stomach, that's a pudding. And even if it's fried later, it's still a pudding. See: Black Pudding, a British blood pudding.
And if it's only steamed, often wrapped in a cloth, it's probably a desert.
In any case, if some British person offers you a "pudding" don't ask questions you really don't want the answer to. Just shut up and eat it. They ARE British after all. And if you really don't want to risk it, ask if you can go to a curry shop instead. Blessed be the Indians who taught the Brits to cook at least one edible dish.
This doesn’t really answer any questions, but at least I’ll end up at a nice curry shop.
I can't guarantee it isn't any or all of those.
THAT’S WHAT’S SO FUCKING FRUSTRATING!
I’M PRETTY SURE IT’S ALL OF THESE! AND ALSO MORE THINGS!
load more comments
(11 replies)
load more comments
(25 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
The way I read it is that possession of the material is illegal, not sharing or recording. Possession. In Denmark possession of CSAM was made illegal and it lead to police being forced to prosecute people who accidentally uncovered CSAM and wanted to report it. I haven't heard of specific cases, but if you want to report existence of CSAM on a CD that is in your hands which you found in the attic of a home you just moved into the police will tell you to destroy it immediately and forget about it because the law can't distinguish between the owner of the CSAM and the current temporary person that possesses it and reports it. The UK law sounds like it will create the same issue (not that I am arguing that consensual BDSM = CSAM. Far from it. I just fear the consequences could be transferrable to this law and outlawing possession of bits and bytes is always a problem).
I btw couldn't find face sitting on the list of outlawed kinks, so those who are into that are safe for now.
Its both. Posession of the material is a 2 year sentence, Production/distribution of the material is 5 years. 3 years for breaking the apparant age barrier.
there's websites that are deleting face sitting as it's unclear if it can be legally viewed as suffocation, so it's a classic morality law that uses vague language to get broad self censorship happening.
The vagueness is absolutely a problem and in morality laws might even be an intended side effect.
This source though interprets it differently saying that having a hand at the throat without actual choking isn't covered but do note the keyword seems to be is splattered all over the page. (PS. The page is SFW but I don't know about the rest of the site).
No matter what this is an inch away from being a straight up though police law.
it's not intended as a side effect, it's a very well known tactic in law writing that goes back to some of the earliest laws humans ever made, the point of vauge language in law is to have wider appeal, and to claim arbitrary power by the law giver.
edit: just adding that part of that arbitrary power is getting people to behave in extreme ways outside of the scope of the legal system 'just in case'. so, people deleting face sitting porn to comply with 'no strangulation' even though there's no language to explicitly say so, and no legal reason to do so.
In Denmark possession of CSAM was made illegal and it lead to police being forced to prosecute people who accidentally uncovered CSAM and wanted to report it. I haven’t heard of specific cases, but if you want to report existence of CSAM on a CD that is in your hands which you found in the attic of a home you just moved into the police will tell you to destroy it immediately and forget about it because the law can’t distinguish between the owner of the CSAM and the current temporary person that possesses it and reports it.
The fuuuuuck? Even in america, the stars would have to align for that to happen. The cop would have to dislike you, the prosecutor would have to dislike you (or be gunning for a higher political position and you're an easy mark for being tough on child criminals), the jury would have to hate you (or be really dumb and not believe you took the material to the cops in the first place), AND you would have to be dumb enough to not realize how hated you are in your local area and still give them the rope to hang you with.
It's nonsense.
See for example the Danish "Operation Umbrella" where more than 1000 cases of possession of CSAM were prosecuted because a video of two fifteen year olds had been shared around on FB messenger.
Those who had received and opened it did not get punished. Those who had passed it on or requested it did.
Perfectly sensible.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Because historically that always goes well.
/S
The govt really shouldn't open up that can of worms.
Because who can resist an open can of worms 🤤😏
Any dorm of choking is banned, which includes face sittning apparently.
DEATH BY SNU SNU!
We need rest. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is spongy and bruised.
What about goblin totem poles
Bruh you made me remember this fever dream of a fucking episode
With this new law effect in the UK, does that mean that most of Totally Spies is banned there?
They should ban the one with the dog instead
You monster, I just stopped crying over Seymour
Nah, he plausibly can breath so it's okay, if I understand the stupid bill's logic.
"What if the half-pints (who shouldn't be on those soites without a porno loicense anyway!) learn the wrong way to have a mad hatter!"
he couldn't breathe a moment ago when he had a pot of honey stuck on his head
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›