this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2026
60 points (91.7% liked)

Games

51745 readers
700 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Considering that the only games I play on console these days are indies and re-releases of old games I love, he’s not wrong. We don’t need better graphics anymore, we need better games. Give me a AAA game that isn’t a money sink with shit gameplay mechanics and I’ll give more power an argument, but if your game is going to require me to get a new console or graphics card then it needs to at least be fun to play, and graphics really don’t matter for that at this point in time and that’s the only reason to say consoles need more power.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

These responses are acting like Sony said this. This is an opinion from their old CEO who hasn't been there in 7y.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 27 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Then why the fuck would anyone buy one over a PS5?

[–] zecg@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Maybe it needs a stupid controller gimmick to mess the gameplay up with so that PC ports are not viable? Like, who even plays games without our second generation rumble with smell-o-vision olfactory release.

[–] ajikeshi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

🌈 exclusives 🌈

and of course the shutdown of the store and license validation for ps5

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

if you already own one or can get a second-hand one for cheap, it has become a great machine for emulation with the current jailbreaks

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because Daddy Sony says you have to buy one to play PS6 titles. No technical reasons other than those artificially imposed by the company.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago

Well at least that would mean they're releasing some titles, unlike the PS5 generation.

[–] ThanksObama@sh.itjust.works 67 points 1 day ago

That's a nice way of saying AMD and Nvidia have abandoned new GPU development.

[–] Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The way things are going, PS6 will be the last PlayStation ever. If it even gets made.

There is zero point to a console without physical games which can also all be run on a PC.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As devil's advocate; standardising a specific SKU of hardware for Devs to target can be a point to have a console even without physical.

The devil's devil's advocate; that can still just be a PC anyway , a-la Steam deck, steam machine, a Mac, or even the next xbox which is rumoured to pretty much just be an Xbox pc.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

or even the next xbox which is rumoured to pretty much just be an Xbox pc.

Well that would be something wouldn't it, seeing Microsoft finally pulling themselves out of this death spiral they've been on for the past ten years, by releasing an actual product that people want.

Though I suspect I'll ruin it by putting loads of ads and unnecessary AI into it.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let me guess! It won‘t have more power, less power or even the exact same power of the PS5 because it simply won‘t get released.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There is genuinely no point in games consoles anymore. There's been absolutely bugger all released for the PS5, so why would I buy from Sony again, and now they're going discless as well.

Seriously, what an absolutely crap generation, all the big releases have been micro transaction loot box BS, or straight up just garbage (often both, see CoD), or genuinely decent games that have also released on the PC. Nothing has been released for the PSVR, and they done barely anything with the adaptive triggers on the controller. If you just go by the amount of innovation this generation has experienced it feels like about 6 months have passed since the console released.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their butchering of the market for this gen has me fully committed to building a wildly expensive AMD Bazzite PC.

No going back, they just suck.

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

PC costs up front, but you save in the long run on games if you're patient and wait for sales. I VERY rarely buy games for more than half price, often 75% off or more. Plus, you get mods.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Exactly. Ans I can find versions stripped of the shit like always online (Hitman) and terrible remake (GTA Collection). I don't even play online so I can't wait to be able to enjoy the games fully, no downsides for me other than cost. And I can sell the playstation to cover some of that.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Make it smaller, make it cheaper, do all the things you can around that.

I'm sure they would if they could, but that's just a new model of a PS5, not a PS6.

It's more than enough power to build the kind of games all of us want to play.

The ceiling on performance and fidelity is also more than most developers can afford to target.

I'm sure they're having regular meetings on whether or not to actually go forward with a PS6 in the timeline they were targeting before the RAMpocalypse, because they're also quite aware of how much of a disaster it's going to be.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah they might even be thinking to postpone a ps6 and just make another slim ps5 hoping to make it cheaper, like they used to back in previous generations. I feel like the slims that came out this generation were more just there for a refresh rather than aiming to make it significantly cheaper to capture the audience they were unable to with existing prices.

At least if i was in charge, that's what I'd be advocating for. You want those that never got a ps5, stuck with their ps4 or even ps3 to see the price of a new ps5 and think that it's now worth the cost. Sadly this would be really hard with the way the hardware manufacturing industry is like at the moment though.

[–] GridGremlin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Hard to argue with. The games people still play twenty years later mostly ran on hardware a phone outruns now; design and solid netcode kept them alive, not teraflops. A PS6 that spends its budget on load times and online play that just works would be the upgrade people actually notice.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, it’s rare these days, but I think I completely agree with him. I can see why we had an iterative console cycle up through the PS4, but even the PS5 felt partly unnecessary. There’s still games that occasionally release on PS4 because the game doesn’t strictly need amazing power.

The Xbox One X vs the Series S is an example of “newer vs stronger”. On some levels the One X has more power, but the S uses newer technology, and each console has some tradeoffs. There’s probably value in finding more innovations like that.

I do think it’s unlikely we’ll see a big new wave of games that only release on “the new system”. The install base is huge now, and the rationale for locking people off just isn’t there. People’s current systems display games at the “graphical plateau” - where there’s just not much return on investment for more graphical power.

[–] Dariusmiles2123@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The most beautiful game I’ve ever played is still Last Of Us 2, a Playstation 4 game.

I’d be happy with such graphical fidelity for at least another 15 years.

I hope the ramageddon is gonna create better optimisation and people are gonna use what they have more.

I don’t plan on getting new hardware until 2029.

My Steam Deck and Playstation 5 are fine for now even if I really want to get out of the Playstation ecosystem and go all in with Linux.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because it's a streaming service. Here's a leaked photo of the announcement

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"I think we have enough power in the machine. The innovation needs to come not from making PS6 for $1,200 - it's to make another PS5 for $300. Now, that would be true innovation," he explains. Layden's comments are particularly timely right now as the PS5 and Xbox Series X|S are much more expensive today than they were at launch, six years ago. "This is the first platform that I've seen that has gone up in price over time."

As suggested, this is their setup to sell a console that is completely eviscerated and can only function as a thin client for a cloud game streaming service. They know the AI RAM prices are not going down before they need to refresh the PS5, and also that people will not en masse pay $1,000+ for a locked-down digital-only console.

That's the only "innovation" that can result in a $300 or so price, so they hope that will change the optics enough for us to own nothing and like it.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A streaming service would run into the same issue, though. In the end, they would need remote high-end GPUs to power the games which are not going to be available to them cheaply enough to justify.

I think they will try to use older hardware (which would potentially fit the handheld idea) and push studios to design around that. He mentions the iterative nature of games which get more and more graphically intense. I'm assuming the thought is to break away from that.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Streaming does help with limited resources as you don't need a GPU for every person, just every person online. But it does become a balancing act of how do you distribute your GPUs and how many concurrent players do you support.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A streaming service would run into the same issue, though. In the end, they would need remote high-end GPUs to power the games which are not going to be available to them cheaply enough to justify.

Yeah, but it would allow them to bury the cost in a subscription renewal instead of up-front price.

[–] Mordikan@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago

I would agree, but they've already done this and pulled the service for lack of subscriptions. This is exactly what PSNow was. They pulled it in 2022 for lack of revenue.

[–] THEPIGWHODIDIT@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The one good thing that will come of the hardware shortage is that developers will be forced to create more optimised software and games, or lose sales as a result.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 13 points 1 day ago

Sony doesn't need more money.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

You can already buy a Switch2 though?