this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
644 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

73878 readers
3874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oozy7@lemmy.world 55 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Remember guys, they cared about the kids and their online safety as soon as Israel started a genocide in Gaza and they lost control of the narrative. But they didn't care at all for the past 20 years when Epstein and his buddies were running rampant.

edit: clarity

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 42 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The real goal is to eliminate anonymity from the internet.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago

It’s about control. They can grant you access or revoke it based on your id.

The powers at be hate that they can’t control the narrative as well as they used to so this is their solution.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

What sucks is that once these laws are in place repealing them will probably never happen. There are far too many people who will benefit financially from this to allow that to happen.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 4 points 5 days ago

They're making it so that vigilante justice is the only form of justice the ruling class can receive.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago (4 children)

No it's not, maybe for some mainstream websites. Saying the "whole internet" is clickbait hyperbole.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

For some people "the whole internet" is like half a dozen websites.

I worked in tech support. For some people Facebook is the internet

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

They mean most of the internet for most people Only the vast socially relevant parts of the internet

[–] laserjet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

elite nerds who use lemmy will be able to circumvent

if the snobs are fine, why care?

those people kvetching about how the endless September ruined everything will have their wish

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago

Well if they enslave everyone else, we are going to feel it too, no matter what cracks of the system we hide in

[–] JeremyHuntQW12@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Australians will soon be subjected to mandatory age checks across the internet landscape, in what has been described as a huge and unprecedented change.

Search engines are next in line for the same controversial age-assurance technology behind the teen social media ban, and other parts of the internet are likely to follow suit.

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-07-11/age-verification-search-engines/105516256

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

It's fucking ironic that this article is asking me to register just to read it.

Can was please fucking stop needing accounts to exist online? So fucking dumb

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago

Age Verification Is Coming for the Whole Corporate Internet

There, FTFY

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 26 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I think we need to organise a massive campaign for people to cancel their entire Isp for at least a month, I'm betting all this would get reversed almost overnight.

Anything but that I fear they win and we all end up on the darknet.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Hahaha

Good luck doing that.

People can't even delay their non-essential shinies to make a statement against price gouging/raising bullshit.. You think they're gonna willingly sacrifice something like internet? for a month?

[–] TotalCourage007@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I mean, wouldn't lemmy qualify as darknet because it isn't the top 10 websites? We should be growing the Federation anyways so I'm down for that. At least they won't ban me for making Trump jokes.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

No, Darknet is just a website that's not listed anywhere. Lemmy is listed in many places.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If it doesnt show up on page 2 it doesnt exist lol

I think thats more the deep web than the dark web 😄

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Uh huh. People are addicted. I'd bet even the people with petabyte home media systems will go into withdrawal within picoseconds after not being able to get more more more more more more

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Not sure about what the norms are where you live, but most people in the US have to sign 1-year agreements for Internet service, and those who don't typically either pay more or would pay before because they're on a cheaper, older rate that is grandfathered in and is no longer offered by the Internet service provider.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] System_below@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Nah the government would love for nobody to have access to the internet lol

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ard@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

this is backwards. why can't publishers mark pages as child-friendly and then browsers and operating systems can have a child-friendly mode that parents (or whoever the authoritarians are) can use. Laws can target people misusing the child-friendly mode.

[–] Coil@lemmy.world 47 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It's not about actually protecting children. It's about data.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 days ago

They're using children as human shields while they attack our human rights.

[–] nickiwest@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

This is the correct answer. Notice that they have no compunction about punishing parents who secure gender-affirming care for their trans kids, but there has been zero discussion of holding parents responsible for their kids' internet usage.

Far-right groups in the US have been crying "Big Brother" about everything for years because their whole plan has been to create a surveillance state where to gather information about dissenters. Every accusation is a confession with these people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Get your coat, we’re leaving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 days ago

Gotta show me the relevant RFC for BGP first.

[–] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

That's what I'm thinking. There goes the Internet.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago

I don't know what they are thinking, but i protect my ID data more than i protect my credit card data.

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Does anyone vaguely remember those internet licenses from that Star Trek DS9 episode when they went back in time but it was the near future from the 80s perspective meaning that it's actually today?

We're going to have internet licenses soon

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

No one needs the internet outside of work. The moment I'm forced to show my ID or get my face scanned, I'm done for good.

[–] itslola@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No one needs the internet outside of work.

As someone with a disability (and no car), the internet has played a massive role in allowing me to live independently, which in turn has a profoundly positive impact on my mental health. There are a wide variety of circumstances in which the internet has enhanced life experience - let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.

[–] MystValkyrie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry. I suppose I should have said "I don't need the internet outside of work."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›