this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2026
1089 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

89678 readers
3934 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jon von Tetzchner, CEO and founder of Vivaldi Technologies, refuses to integrate AI features in its browser and wants human engineers, not AI, to write its code.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mHtt@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 hours ago

remember when they let Homer design a car?

same shit happens when users get to design software.

[–] teslekova@lemmy.ml 197 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

"Customers don't want it" is surprisingly difficult to understand for a lot of companies nowadays. Vivaldi must be run by some sort of language genius.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

It's a private compnay, they don't have to follow shareholders so it explains it

[–] octobob@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It's really dumb but it holds true. I work for a company that profits tens of millions per year, and we're owned by one guy. I've worked at places that are owned by hedge funds or giant corporations like GE and you can just tell the difference. Here I've been told that if the shop needs something, it's basically a blank check. The owner gave everyone in the company a $3 raise last year, and we get a 10% bonus of your salary annually as a profit sharing initiative. Annual raises are good, wages are excellent, benefits are some of the best in the country and they do everything they can to keep them as a low cost. We just happen to manufacture things that nobody else in the country does.

Compared to other other more typical companies it's really night and day. I used to get a 3% annual raise and a "I can't get you more even though I want to". And some of the shittiest health insurance imaginable. My coworker broke his foot and they wouldn't wait on him until he saw a specialist like wtf he literally just needed a cast

[–] redballooon@lemmy.world 15 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

Methinks shareholders should somehow be concerned what end users want.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 25 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Shareholders want the line to go up, currently AI is a thing that makes that happen, long-term effects be damned.

[–] Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca 1 points 10 hours ago

Somehow and for now

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

"wants"

it's chromium, it uses ai. i think this guy wants to do marketing

[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

This guy is my new hero.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 17 points 15 hours ago

adult person right here. true G.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago (9 children)

I really hope Vivaldi stays good. It's basically the only browser I'm considering usable. I'll make do with something else in a pinch, but surfing the web without Vivaldi is like not having a hand.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm using it for stuff that doesn't work without Chromium (like a translation tool that doesn't break SPA forms) but yeah not being able to use my custom adblockers concerns me.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago

Same. If it weren't a Chromium browser I'd explore it more, it seems to have a lot of neat options.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (5 children)

I'd use Vivaldi if it wasn't chrorium and closed source, sadly it's such a turn off

[–] blunket@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The UI layer is the only part that's closed source. Vivaldi's UI is also one of the main reasons people use it.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Yeah but de facto i still cannot see what they put in there

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago

I, too, would use Vivaldi if it wasn't Vivaldi.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] whelk@retrolemmy.com 69 points 21 hours ago

I'm not switching to Vivaldi, but it is refreshing to see someone say "I didn't put X in the product because people don't want X in the product."

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

I Zen Browser and Vivaldi. Vivaldi is great.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 20 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

Firefox has locally run AI features you can turn off easily. I don't see the harm. Occasionally I use the translation feature for foreign websites.
If you ask me, Firefox gets a lot of shit and it's blown completely out of proportion. Are they without flaw? Of course not, but it's not nearly as bad as people want you to believe.

[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 20 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

AI features should be opt in, not opt out. Every time it updates it also often turns those features back on (at least a couple times for me)

[–] kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The AI features are why I switched to Waterfox, as they promised to not implement the Firefox's AI-stuff. That promise has held, at least so far.

[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago

Good to know. I see they are available both on Linux and android, so all bases covered.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Instead I switched to Waterfox which is just Firefox with all of the bullshit excluded.

The problem isn't what is in Firefox now, it's what will be in Firefox in the future. It's their clearly established predilection for mindless trend-chasing and willingness to ignore their users' clearly stated wishes in order to pack the damn thing full of crap nobody wants anyway rather than actually utilize their comparatively meager resources towards actually developing the actual browser part of the browser. That's a huge issue.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (7 children)

It's hard to convince me to switch away from Firefox, but Vivaldi doesn't seem like a horrible choice if you need Chromium for WebUSB or something.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 3 points 12 hours ago

AI is much too energy consuming to be a default option.

[–] B0NK3RS@lazysoci.al 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

A good ol' browser war in the comments to get the day started :/

[–] jaygray91@piefed.zip 6 points 11 hours ago

A traditional past time of the internet.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›