this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2025
758 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

73878 readers
3662 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 34 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Man I cannot fucking wait until this stupid goddamn bubble pops

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Im so tired of this stupud fucking refrain. Cause we all know how housing got so mich better after 08 and how we dont have any more dot coms and how the internet got so much better since that bubble. You people have no idea what your even asking for.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Me too. I can then go back to 3D printing quantum blockchains out of room temperature superconductors in my private space station with Katy Perry.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I find that hard to believe right up until the point you mentioned Katy.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

If she's good enough for Justin, she's good enough for me.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

In other words, they want to hook up users and companies, make them dependent, and then rise up the prices severely while finding ways to process and incorporate all of the data they've gathered in ways that will probably involve automating the jobs of the users themselves.

[–] snf@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

aka enshittification

[–] irish_link@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

So what I am learning is that I should start vibe coding even the small scripts that are less than 10 lines.

Done. I will start doing that.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Basically, the only reason some of these vaguely functional AI tools actually work okay is because they haven't been ruined with inevitable monetisation yet.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 8 points 19 hours ago

Already the cost is quite high. A prolific year can easily burn 100usd a day in tokens and they have not even started to enshitify.

Some of the cost to run these models will come down a bit if Nvidia gets some actual competition which I'm sure will happen in the medium to long term because the hyper scalers definitely don't like paying Nvidia's AI ransom and the Chinese don't want to be beholden to a company the US can influence.

We will see which happens first.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 32 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, this is part of the business model. The goal is to get everyone addicted to their service, then jack the price up to profitable margins. It's the same model Netflix and Amazon used. Bothe services lost money for over 10 years before becoming profitable.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

YouTube as well.

[–] toothpaste_ostrich@feddit.nl 4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Venture capitalism is what it's called, I think

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

It is not venture capitalism. Though it is fueled by venture capitalism. I am describing the type of car and you are calling it gasoline. They're most distinctly not the same thing.

However it should be noted there both a part of the same corrosion of our society. Just how automobiles that run on gasoline are a corrosion on our atmosphere.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Venture capitalism is when you give somebody money to start a business in hopes that they make it big, giving you really valuable equity for relatively little money. What you're thinking of is blitzscaling. Scale up in an unsustainable way in order to gain market dominance, so that you can use that to become profitable.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So much of the AI stuff we see today are boards reacting and worrying about being "left behind" in AI. In many cases, the goal is not to deliver value. The goal is to be able to attach a little sticker that says "AI" to their products to excite the shareholders.

Unfortunately in this case, some of the largest companies in the world haven't been able to figure out how to run AI services at a profit.

This could change any day if some more efficient hardware arrives, but until then, most of the software world is just crossing their fingers it becomes profitable one day while they light dollar bills on fire in their datacenters.

If this isn't "bubbleish" behavior I don't know what is.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 13 hours ago

I was in a local bike store looking at red tail lights yesterday.

One brand Lezyne had several versions. There was an "AI Alert" one. I looked it up and it just has a sensor to detect when you brake and it changes to a different flashing mode at that time.

Thats barely even "smart" let alone "AI".

The stupid thing is, because of this dumb claim they needed to confirm that it doesn't collect and transmit any data about your riding habits. Its a light with no connectivity other than a charging port.

The dumbfuckery is astonishing.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Isn't this just the tech industry. Run at a loss. Eat VC money. Wait. Wait.

Some how you become normalized and suddenly important Next thing you know you're raking profit.

Like the guy that has no friends who nobody really likes. He won't go away. He just sticks around. Nobody ever told him to fuck off. So he's just part of the group.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Yep, and they were helped a lot after the 2008 financial crisis when interest rates were dropped super low and loans were cheap. That's a major reason why the market has been screaming for the fed to cut the interest rate as much as possible.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

after crypto, and Now AI, they will be chasing whatever faux tech that comes out next.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

and then you go on linkedin and all the middle manager tech bros will hail it as the second coming.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Now I'm suddenly tempted to start using it. or at least coming up with a bot to keep it busy.

[–] WhirlpoolBrewer@lemmings.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Holy crap, has anyone ever attempted to create an "AI fork bomb"? Go to one of these agent bots, and tell it to create accounts with the other agent code bots. These new accounts will all be told to create accounts on all the other code bots services. And do this recursively forever. So the flow would be 1 bot makes lets say 5 bots. Each of those 5 bots make 5 more bots. And each of those 5 bots make 5 more. So the total number of running bots becomes like 1 * 5 * 5 * 5 * 5...

Obligatory, this is purely hypothetical, and you should never do this for legal reasons.

[–] SugarCatDestroyer@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Sounds like a great idea, although no, commoners are not given the same privileges as capitalists. So I'm afraid there will be problems indeed.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

Caveat: this applies to literally every new technology especially in the VC funded world.

first truly positive use for ai

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 117 points 1 day ago (22 children)

when this bubble pops it's gonna be horrific.

google, meta, ms, so many more leveraged out huge investments in datacenters. nvidia is propping up whole segments of the fucking economy.

https://www.wheresyoured.at/ai-is-a-money-trap/

it'd be fun to watch if I could isolate myself from the chaos that will ensue, but we're all gonna get fucked by the aibros, it's only a question of which segment of the economy blows up first.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 day ago (7 children)

A lot of startups whose entire business model relies on OpenAI's small model API calls costing under $1/Mtok, are going to go bust when OpenAI finally runs out of money and ramps the cost up tenfold.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 45 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

There is another factor in this which often gets overlooked. A LOT of the money invested right now is for the Nvidia chips and products based around them. As many gamers are painfully aware, these chips devalue very quickly. With the progress of technology moving so fast, what was once a top of the line unit gets outclassed by mid tier hardware within a couple of years. After 5 years it's usefulness is severely diminished and after 10 years it is hardly worth the energy to run them.

This means the window for return on investment is a lot shorter than usual in tech. For example when creating a software service, there would be an upfront investment for buying the startup that created the software. Then some scaling investment in infrastructure and such. But after that it turns into a steady state where the input of money is a lot lower than revenue from the customer base that was grown. This allows to get returns on investment for many years after that initial investment and growth phase.

With this Ai shit it works a bit different. If you want to train and run the latest models in order to remain competitive in the market, you would need to continually buy the latest hardware from Nvidia. As soon as you start running on older hardware, your product would be left behind and with all the competition out there users would be lost very quickly. It's very hard to see how the trillions of dollars invested now are ever going to be recovered within the span of five years. Especially in a time where so much companies are dumping their products for very low prices and sometimes even for free.

This bubble has to burst and it is going to be bad. For the people who were around when the dotcom bubble burst, this is going to be much worse than that ever was.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Prox@lemmy.world 161 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Isn't this true of like everything AI right now?

We're in the "grow a locked-in user base" part of their rollout. We'll hit the "make money" part in a year or two, and then the enshittification machine will kick into high gear.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 91 points 1 day ago (54 children)

That’s the usual business plan. However, people don’t really like ai. The results aren’t great, so, if they jack up the price, people will likely cancel. The lock in is poor as the product and convenience is poor. It doesn’t really save money as promised.

load more comments (54 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm skeptical of AI coding as it exists today, and while I'm bullish on long-term prospects for AI writing software, am very dubious that simply using LLMs is going to be the answer.

However.

Startups typically do lose money. They'll burn money as they acquire a userbase


their growth phase


and transition to profitability later. I don't think "startups in area X tend to be losing money" is terribly surprising.

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you're VERY justified in feeling skeptical, I'm seeing it first hand, you're correct.

I'm a consultant/freelancer and I'm booked for the rest of the year and well into the new year with jobs that pretty much consist of me reviewing and cleaning up AI slop.

Most of my clients are startups and small companies that went full in on AI and vibe coding. Now they're discovering that their attempts to save a few bucks by leveraging AI, cutting devs, etc is costing them more that what they envisioned on saving. The stuff they've built with AI doesn't scale, is full of exploits, and breaks quickly. With the recent Tea App thing many of my clients are now in a panic because they essentially did the exact same thing. They don't want their startup to be next in the news because some rando came across their house with the front door left open by AI.

the tech debt is massive, It's costing many of these places more to fix their vibe coders/AI mistakes than what it would have originally cost if they just used a solid dev team. Make no mistake, I'm charging them a good amount also.

All if it could have been avoided though. They could have continued to use their LLM's if they had all just kept a leash on it. if they dismissed the concept of vibe coding. A good chunk of it could have been avoided if the person feeding the prompts simply REVIEWED the code before hitting enter. I'm not kidding, IF they just LOOKED at what was being spat out things would be different. none of them did. they just trusted the AI to be smarter because they were lead to believe it was.

[–] traceur301@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

how do you book software work so far out? for some reason my software clients seem to all want their stuff yesterday

[–] rozodru@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I've been doing it for like 20+ years now so I have a very solid client base and very solid referrals. All my new clients now are referred to me by previous/existing clients so it gives me the luxury of booking well in advance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Ok, but it isn't just startups burning money here like there's no tomorrow - it's also major industry leaders (Microsoft, Facebook, Apple, Google, Nvidia, etc.) dumping hundreds of billions into infrastructure and development of a tech that has, so far, shown 0 positive returns for anyone and everyone. Everyone involved is pouring in money like it's going out of style, largely because they see this as a potential pathway to infinite profits down the line, just as long as THEY are the ones to get there first; consequences be damned. WHEN this bubble pops, not IF, it'll be messy. Extremely messy.

[–] twix@infosec.pub 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ed Ziltron has a good piece regarding whether the losses are “just another startup” or something more. I am very much leaning towards “burning money at an insane rate just to give the impression of growth”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Good. Costs is the key point to get rid of it.

load more comments
view more: next ›