this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
834 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

74545 readers
3741 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall bypass: https://archive.is/oWcIr

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boor@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Why would anyone want an editor that doesn’t fact check?

[–] toeblast96@sh.itjust.works 46 points 6 days ago (3 children)

tbh i somehow didnt even realize that wikipedia is one of the few super popular sites not trying to shove ai down my throat every 5 seconds

i'm grateful now

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Don't count your chickens before they hatch, Jimmy Wales founded Wikipedia and already used ChatGPT in a review process once according to this article.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

To all our readers on Lemmy,

Please don’t scroll past this. This Friday, for the 1st time recently, we interrupt your reading to humbly ask you to support Wikipedia’s independence. Only 2% of our readers give. Many think they’ll give later, but then forget. If you donate just £2, or whatever you can this Friday, Wikipedia could keep thriving for years. We don't run ads, and we never have. We rely on our readers for support. We serve millions of people, but we run on a fraction of what other top sites spend. Wikipedia is special. It is like a library or a public park where we can all go to learn. We ask you, humbly: please don’t scroll away. If Wikipedia has given you £2 worth of knowledge this year, take a minute to donate. Show the world that access to neutral information matters to you. Thank you.

[–] ramsay@lemmy.world 71 points 6 days ago (9 children)

I will stop donating to Wikipedia if they use AI

[–] Corn@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wikipedia already has a decades operating cost of savings.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

No they don't because they blast it on inflated exec wages.

[–] miasmati@lemmings.world 9 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why don't they blast execs and reduce the expenses.

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Just got back from asking them. They said they like cash moneys and don't like blasting themselves.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

This is such a tiresome aspect of society. Even if you believe in executives, they certainly don’t need to get paid more than anyone else.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 6 days ago (9 children)

jimmy wales is also the president and co-founder of fandom

to give you an idea of who that guy is

[–] Devmapall@lemmy.zip 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Fandom (previously Wikia) is an extremely shitty service with low-quality wikis mostly consisting of content copied from independent wikis and a terrible layout that only exists to amplify their overwhelming advertising.

[–] Tortellinius@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

While this is true, the majority of the wikis are not at all low quality. Some are the only ones existing for a topic. The wikis are community-based, after all.

But its easy to vandalize and is highly profit-driven. The fandom wikis are filled with ads that absolutely destroy navigation. Infamous is the video ad that scrolls you up automatically in the middle of reading once it finishes. You have to pause it to read the article with no interruption.

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

my one weird trick for using fandom.com is to disable javascript for that domain.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What if they put anubis on it ?

[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

Anubis only does a proof of work challenge if you lack a specific cookie that it gives you. You can temporarily enable JavaScript, pass the challenge, get the cookie, then disable JavaScript.

I use uBlock Origin, btw, to make selectively enabling/disabling JavaScript per domain a simple two-click task.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

they captured the "niche wiki" market as wikia, then rebranded and started serving shittons of ads. the vim wiki is unusable these days because it runs like ass and looks like a gamer rgb nightmare

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

There's an addon for that, Indie Wiki Buddy.
It tries to redirect you to non fandom/fextralife wikis if they exist, and if not, it proxies fandom wikis through BreezeWiki which just displays the content.

And I'll take this opportunity to plug Hohser and the uBlock AI blocklist as well.

[–] hr_@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the Wikipedia page does say it was sold in 2018. Not sure how it was before but it's not surprising that it enshittified by now.

[–] OboTheHobo@ttrpg.network 7 points 6 days ago

I guess in his defense it wasn't too bad before 2018, as far as I can remember. Most of the enshittification of fandom I can remember has happened since.

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

Obligatory plug for BreezeWiki. Makes that shit actually usable.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 39 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

He can also stick AI inside his own ass

[–] Caketaco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Christ, I miss when I could click on an article and not be asked to sign up for it.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Oh, right! Thanks for reminding me. I tried to archive it the last time but it took forever.

Edit. There ya' go: https://archive.is/oWcIr

[–] Yaztromo@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

You know, I remember way back in the day when…


#Interested in reading the rest of this comment?

Please sign up with your name, DOB, banking information, list of valuables, times you’re away from home, and an outline of your house key to “Yaztromo@lemmy.world”. It’s quick, easy, and fun!


…and that’s why I’m no longer welcome in New Zealand. Crazy!

[–] UnrepententProcrastinator@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As I have adblock mostly because of the abuse of trackers, I understand people trying to monetize their work.

[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Journalists monetizing their work is totally reasonable. The problem for me is that it seems unfair to ask that literally everyone trying to read an article have to sign up. Maybe I’m missing something.

[–] lens0021@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 days ago

He is nobody to Wikipedia now. He also failed to create a news site and a micro SNS.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Not sure about Wikipedia, but Conservapedia would find it very useful. In fact, since most of their entries are factually incorrect and appear as fantasy I think AI writing articles would save them a lot of time.

Bonus: hallucinations can help create new conspiracy theories!

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 days ago
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Important context: he’s not suggesting AIs writing content for Wikipedia. He’s suggesting using AI to provide feedback for new editors. Take that how you will.

(From another discussion on this.)

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago

Right, which makes it just as bad. Wikipedia had enough proofreaders. You don't need AI for that, because the need is already filled.

This is entirely different from a book writer who is going everything solo and has exactly one publishing window.

And writing feedback software has existed for decades. So AI adds nothing new. Again it is snake oil. It is always snake oil. Except when it's bait and switch, to pretend it wasn't snake oil in the first place.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Honestly, translating the good articles from other languages would improve Wikipedia immensely.

For example, the Nanjing dialect article is pretty bare in English and very detailed in Mandarin

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

You can do that, that's fine. As long as you can verify it is an accurate translation, so you need to know the subject matter and the target language.

But you could probably also have used Google translate and then just fine tune the output yourself. Anyone could have done that at any point in the last 10 years.

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Google translate is horrendously bad at Korean, especially with slang and accidental typos. Like nonsense bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I recently have edited a small wiki page that was obviously written by someone that wasn’t proficient in English. I used AI to just reword what was already written and then I edited the output myself. It did a pretty good job. It was a page about some B-list Indonesian actress that I just stumbled upon and I didn’t want to put time and effort into it but the page really needed work done.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So I fed the page to ChatGPT to ask for advice. And I got what seems to me to be pretty good. And so I'm wondering if we might start to think about how a tool like AFCH might be improved so that instead of a generic template, a new editor gets actual advice. It would be better, obviously, if we had lovingly crafted human responses to every situation like this, but we all know that the volunteers who are dealing with a high volume of various situations can't reasonably have time to do it. The templates are helpful - an AI-written note could be even more helpful.

This actually sounds like a plausibly decent use for an LLM. Initial revision to take some of the load off from the human review process isn't a bad idea - he isn't advocating for AI to write articles, just that it can be useful for copy-editing and potentially supplement a system already heavy in Go/No Go evaluations.

Which is weird, really. Jimmy Wales is just fucking awful. I didn't realize he was anatomically capable of not talking out of his ass.

load more comments
view more: next ›