this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
253 points (97.4% liked)

World News

49438 readers
2161 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel justified its murder of Al Jazeera’s crew on the grounds that one among them, Anas al-Sharif, a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, was secretly a “Hamas terrorist”.

Sharif, we are told, similarly found time between breaks from his 22-month, frantic reporting schedule - much of it on camera - to serve as a Hamas commander “directing rocket attacks on Israeli civilians”.

We now know exactly where this ridiculous story originated: from something Israel calls its “Legitimisation Cell”. The intelligence unit’s name, which was surely never supposed to come to light, is the give-away. Its job has been to legitimise Israel’s atrocities with stories vilifying its victims and thereby making the genocide more palatable to Israeli and western audiences.

The Israeli news website +972 exposed the cell within days of Sharif’s killing this month, reporting that it was formed after 7 October 2023 - the day Hamas and other groups broke out of their Gaza prison camp, spreading carnage, following 17 years of a brutal siege.

But while Israeli mendacity is entirely to be expected - after all, it is the whole purpose of its official hasbara industry - what astonishes most is the western media’s continuing connivance in promoting Israel’s litany of lies.

Germany’s most popular paper, Bild, published a front page that might as well have been written by the Israeli military: “Terrorist disguised as a journalist killed in Gaza.” No claim, no quote marks. Just a statement of fact.

The UK media was little better, with most outlets prominently featuring Israel’s unevidenced “legitimisation” smears of Sharif in headlines and coverage. Astonishingly, BBC coverage on its flagship News at Ten swallowed whole Israel’s framing of Sharif as a legitimate target - as well as uncritically peddling the presumption that Israel was targeting him and him alone.

The context that has been missing from western coverage is this: Israel has killed more than 240 Palestinian journalists in Gaza over the past two years - more than all the journalists killed in both World Wars, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the wars in the former Yugoslavia, and the Afghanistan War combined.

This is a pattern - a glaring one - but seemingly one to which western journalists are entirely blind, even as Israel continues to bar them from reporting in Gaza, nearly two years into its genocide.

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

Western media took two ongoing genocides. Committed by Israel and Russia. And swept both under the rug under a wave of contrarian bullshit

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are so obviously and transparently bullshitting us and the west is NOT CALLING THEM OUT ON THEIR BULLSHIT ffs, this is blood-boiling to say the least!

[–] granolabar@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 day ago

Nobody cares what western citizens think. But esp if they oppose the genocide

[–] RymrgandsDaughter@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is it really the media at this point or is just that anyone with power is owned

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Lets be real. The Israeli lobby has tons of money. They buy out the politicians and wield power to silence critics. Everything that challenges their power becomes 'antisemitic'.

[–] Davriellelouna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Regardless of the content of the article.

I want to remind people that the Middle East Eye is directly run by the Qatari Embassy in London:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jun/23/close-al-jazeera-saudi-arabia-issues-qatar-with-13-demands-to-end-blockade

When Saudi Arabia and the UAE blockaded Qatar, the Middle East Eye started hitting them 24/7.

Another thing suspicious is the absence of revenue.

Around the world, newspapers fund themselves in 3 different ways :

  • Advertising
  • Subscriptions
  • Donations

The Middle East Eye has no advertising. It has no subscriptions. And they don't ask for donations.

I have never seen anything like this. How do they fund themselves...?!

Again, this is NOT an attack on the content. But people should simply know this is a state-run newspaper.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Are you going to remind us again when someone posts a BBC or PBS or NPR article?

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

In fairness, I think this OP needs to list their job title and company too so that we can be informed about who's funding them.

[–] Davriellelouna@lemmy.world -2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Are you going to remind us again when someone posts a BBC or PBS or NPR article?

Why would I do that?

They are transparent about their ownership structure and sources of funding:

https://www.npr.org/about-npr/178660742/public-radio-finances

https://www.bbc.com/aboutthebbc/reports/

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Then you can keep reminding us of BBC caving in to zionist lobbies

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

Your article doesn't provide any evidence or your claim. Nor does it debunk the article itself.

It would be very cool if Qatar was the only country doing actual journalism about Gaza, but from my reading of MEE I severely doubt it's Qatar running the operation.

MEE writes plenty of critical reports about Qatar. They do almost always go very soft on one specific country though. And it's not the one you named.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 19 hours ago

Actual journalists won't say someone is a murderer even if there's a video of the person shooting a guy pulling out their ID and showing it to the camera and say "my name is ___ and I murdered this person".

When the person is charged then they will be termed "alleged murderer". Before there's charges they're termed something like "shooter" not murderer. Only once someone is convicted of the crime will they be called "murderer".

Genocide is a much greater crime than murder. It's not responsible journalism to make accusations like this. If a body like the ICJ convicted Israel's leadership on charges, or maybe id the country the media organization is based in made a declaration, then a journalist will start using the word genocide.

"Alternative media" have no journalistic standards and will say such things to lead their audiences to conclusions. If you're reading articles that are telling you how to think about a story, it's not actually journalism. Real journalism is about telling people what's happening, not telling people how they're supposed to think about, and definitely not about making accusations in an effort support activist causes.

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yes yes, but what kind of framing is

the day Hamas and other groups broke out of their Gaza prison camp, spreading carnage, following 17 years of a brutal siege.

Sounds like an excuse to a terror attack with almost exclusively civilian targets. Why is it so hard for advocates of the Palestinian cause to condemn this attack??

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Condemn the genocide and 57 years of occupation. Explaining the circonstences thst let to the creation and the rise of hamas is not hamas apologism

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No it‘s not, but calling a terrorist attack that targeted explicitly civilians „spreading carnage“ is.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

That’s nonsense. It’s like thinking that mentioning Nat Turner’s revolt—where children were killed—because slave owners had been oppressing enslaved people is somehow an apology for killing innocent people

Also i am waiting for you to condemn 77 years of oppressing Palestinians and 57 years of occupying Gaza and the west bank. You don't seem to have an issue when 7 of October is always mentioned when talking about the genocide

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Those civilian were not targets of Hamas (though I’m sure there was collateral damage); they were the targets of the IOF’s Hannibal Directive.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You mean> 90% military targets according to Western standards, of which more than 33% on active military duty?

Just look at the West Bank and find out what non violent resistance leads to.

You must not be used to being provided with the actual context of October 7. Very shocking to learn that Palestinians were actually in a concentration camp for 17 years and broke out. I wonder why that part of the both sides story never gets reported.

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That doesn't justify attacking civilians, just like the attack on the music festival doesn't justify Israel attacking civilians.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, it totally does since every Israeli is a military citizen from my understanding

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Mandatory military service is a shitty excuse to kill civilians.

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

lol no. You’re killing a person who has been trained to kill, totally fine by me

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

So too you North Korea attacking a South Korean music festival would be perfectly fine because South Korea has mandatory military service?

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dickalan@lemmy.world -2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

military service is mandatory for most Jewish Israelis. So yeah, buddy, I was right, stop trying to fucking gaslight people online, Israel is paying you enough?

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 0 points 8 hours ago

So it would be totally cool for North Korea to bomb a South Korean music festival because South Korea has mandatory military service?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Israel shouldn't put a "music festival" next to a military base guarding a concentration camp. And especially not have armed active duty IDF soldiers using the festival as human shields.

https://youtu.be/Pt_1k7nSv1M

[–] dukemirage@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why did they attack the music festival?

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Because the music festival was in between the path to a military base and should have already ended by that day.

Why did they attack more than 5 military bases around Gaza responsible for their concentration camp you ask? Or did the Western media not tell you about that?