this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2025
276 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74545 readers
4176 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

The biases:

  1. Calls Israel's genocide a genocide.
  2. Does not state, that the "judeo-christian" god is real, and that the creation myth is real. Does not state that evolution is a "discredited theory", using arguments from the Discovery Institute as citations.
  3. States that trans people exists, citations point to actual studies, articles don't automatically redirect to an article about "narcissistic personality disorder", currently existing article on NPD does not list "gender confusion" as a potential sympthom, and no links to websites of christian "psychologists" (read: theologists with a doctorate) offering "therapy" (read: exorcism, forced prayer, forced conversion to fundamentalist christianity.
  4. Does not call liberalism a "childish psychosis".
  5. Lists actual COVID death numbers, does not call mRNA vaccines "modified RNA", does not reserve autism spectrum disorder only for boys that are extremely low functioning.
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 12 hours ago

1st amendment mf. Wikipedia can have an article convincing people 2+2=5 if they want and it is protected speech you fascist assholes.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

If the US tries to kill Wikipedia I'm actually forming a militia

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 hours ago

Like... You should probably get to work organizing then because they're already doing it.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

They can try... Wikipedia has been bolstering themselves against this exact kind of attack for many years. They've made the entirety of the site completely downloadable for literally anyone to make and keep a copy and lots of people do (though the more the better).

The Wikimedia corporation that runs the actual site may have to ensure that it's incorporated in a different country though.

[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

the wilitia

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 104 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

There is nothing to investigate, Wikipedia is a private organization and if it has a bias it is none of the government's business.

The party of "small government?" "Don't tread on me?" What the hell happened, Republicans?

They only ever cared about white supremacy. All that other stuff was bullshit.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Conservatives only care about small government when they are the ones being oppressed by the federal government. Like when Congress passed laws banning slavery.

But they care about federal laws being forced onto states when they are the ones doing the oppressing. Like when they passed the Fugitive Slave Act.

They don't care about their hypocrisy and, if anything, makes them want to do it more.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

You forgot the scare quotes around "oppressed."

They don’t care about their hypocrisy and, if anything, makes them want to do it more.

Hypocrisy is a feature because it serves as a demonstration of their power and impunity. The message is "of course we're being blatantly hypocritical; what are you gonna do about it, peasant?"

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

In Hungary we have a saying: "The problem isn't what he did, but that he was busted doing it." since the Gábor Kaleta and József Szájer cases, and the Hungarian PragerU clone Axióma kind of implied this, essentially saying "leftist hypocrisy proves that the left's views are unfeasible, rightist hypocrisy proves that people on the right are humans first and foremost".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Facism happened. Governement run by Captialists.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 4 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

That’s only when it’s private companies they like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 17 points 16 hours ago

In other words, they're not publishing the propaganda of the new fascist US government?

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 18 hours ago

Yes, truth and reality have a bias against fascism.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 13 points 16 hours ago

So what if it was?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 19 points 17 hours ago

aaaand just donated another $100 to Wikipedia.

[–] NoodlePoint@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago

They're scared of self-governing NGOs and free fonts of knowledge.

[–] elucubra@piefed.social 118 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What the hell does the house oversight comitee have to do with a private endeavor?

Even if there was such bias, doesn't the 1st amendment cover it, as it does Fox, for example?

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 41 points 20 hours ago
  1. Nothing
  2. They just needed an excuse. You believing it isn't a concern.
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago

forgot about Epstein yet?

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 55 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'd say when open source seems organized against you, you might be the problem.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Reality has a non-frothing-at-the-mouth-oblivious-cult-member bias to it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 35 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck you fuck you fuck you. Investigate Truth Social, Twitter, the Smithsonian, the FBI, the DOJ, the President, Congress, the DoD, the DoE, the NSA, and the Supreme Court, if you are worried about bias.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 68 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is there something illegal about that? If Wikipedia has organizational bias, it’s covered by their first amendment right.

[–] Weirdmusic@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

You have "The right to free speech (as long as you're not dumb enough to actually try it)".

The Clash

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

A right that's getting rapidly eroded. Like, 1A is a right that's pretty much reduced to only existing on paper at this point and some politicians are probably looking for a way to erase it from the Constitution entirely.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Or replace it with the conservative version, which states: white men have the right to call black people the hard-R N-word, without consequences, including getting called racist, losing friends, losing employment opportunities.

[–] iThinkDifferentThanU@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

rights for thee not for me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago

Organized bias is illegal? Of course in this context its simply the truth.

[–] handsoffmydata@lemmy.zip 8 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If you don’t have a [Kiwix Server] spun up, do it today!(https://kiwix.org/en/)

[–] HakunaHafada@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

This is a very neat thing, thanks for sharing!

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

Oh look, it's HUAC II!

[–] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 43 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Good thing I downloaded it then because it's probably going to be blocked in the US next.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] manxu@piefed.social 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Scientific proof that we are in the dumbest timeline.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

"organized bias" lmfao. Did you you mean jewish lobbies getting people fired and Israeli state flooding google ads with war propaganda?

[–] 7toed@midwest.social 5 points 18 hours ago

Selfhosters, that is your cue if you haven't already made at least a local mirror

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 22 hours ago

to be fair their thing is whining about shit for a day then moving on to different shit to whine about

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 14 points 23 hours ago

On July 4, 2026, nothing happened on Lafayette Square in Washington, DC, USA.

(And if something happened, its because they were viOlEnT riOToRs and we had to send in the tanks to restore LaW aNd oRdEr!!!)

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"Anything that says Hitler was bad, slavery was bad, and that Donald Trump isn't literally God is biased and must be changed!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Can't it just relocate to say... Switzerland

load more comments
view more: next ›