this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
599 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

74854 readers
3283 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Is this good? I can’t tell if it’ll just be used as one more invasive information gathering data points for Amazon and google

[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Is this good? I can’t help but think it’s just another datapoint for google to scrape

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Wifi sognals can read my heart rate, and be used to track me around my house. But I still can't get a signal in my room one floor up from the router.

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

This is the key point - these have to be clear signals in the same room.

[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] dyc3@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] alekwithak@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Faster speeds, better connection, requires higher AP density.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 219 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One day, WiFi might even be usable as a method for making a reliable network connection

[–] Tlf@feddit.org 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Just imagine how much humanity could benefit if sharing and accessing knowledge was freely available for almost anyone

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is not sharing and accessing, but generating. If we had a system where people would be paid for generating knowledge, then they wouldn't have to charge for accessing knowledge.

That's why a lot more research should be paid for by the government. In exchange, government-funded research would be excluded from having patents and/or copyright.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Goverment funded research is paid for my public money via taxes but the research information is not publicly accessible, I can understand this if it's defense or other secretive research but there is no reason someone should have to pay for access to other research fields information when it is publicly funded

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

That's the joke.

[–] Tlf@feddit.org 2 points 19 hours ago

Depends on how specific the information is and how well it's hidden among alternative facts

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 10 points 1 day ago

One can dream. For now though it's the one radio my phone doesn't use. Mobile network tunneling through Bluetooth baby! My atrial fibrillation when remain between me and my meth dealer! Shout out to Craig!

[–] Dalraz@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is really cool and will be useful. My second thought was oh great now my smart TV can see how excited I am watching their injected ads and how many people saw it too. One of the many reasons to never connect modern TVs to the Internet.

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 hours ago

The next headline will be "wifi connecting to internet-no modem needed"

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 44 points 1 day ago (11 children)

The Paper: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/11096342/metrics#metrics

This is very cool and useful, but at the same time very concerning. While I see a lot of good use cases for this ranging from hospitals to stress recognition in animals I Am also quite scared, that big corporations will use this to spy on us. Luckily currently it is only possible to measure the pulse at about 3m, but it should be possible to increase the range. It may fall short when multiple persons are in detection range, but as far as I have read from the paper they did not test this.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 59 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Inb4 the cops starts doing nonconsensual "polygraph tests" using wifi

Those 5G Conspiracy Theorists probably feel vindicated after reading this lol

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 116 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (25 children)

This tech scares the hell out of me.

Great if we can make MRI quality imaging eventually available, but being able to monitor where people are in their homes remotely and their health status in our world is fucking dangerous.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Insurance companies...sorry you're denied for being a health risk....we can see from your home internet that you're an unhealthy person

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember kids, you can buy your own home fiber router! Don't live with someone else's equipment between you and the internet.

[–] CallMeMrFlipper@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Care to explain what you mean? Are you saying you can run fiber in your house? Doesn't that still require some form of equipment from an ISP to actually go out to the internet?

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The fiber line into your house from the ISP is needed. What that fiber line connects to is up to you. The router your ISP provides isn't special. You can get your own equipment.

[–] CallMeMrFlipper@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I'm not super familiar with fiber. There's no modem or anything needed? Don't they still track data usage? Are they able to do that without any intermediate equipment?

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 133 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Damn. “TikTok would like to access WiFi”

We need new permissions for this shit. WiFi can do presence detection and now heart rate? What next? Eye tracking?

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm pretty sure applications can only send and receive data, with the finer details being handled by the OS.

But yes, there should be a specific permission to access biometric information.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow, all that with an esp32. No fancy hardware needed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 46 points 2 days ago (7 children)

How much longer until I can be like "Hey, Google; scan the area for lifeforms?"

load more comments
view more: next ›