this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2025
162 points (95.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

43426 readers
781 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This guy is 38 and she was part of some chatroom and he started talking to her 13 year old little sister in a way that very obviously had ill intent. She called him out on this and posted screenshots of that chatroom online. Now ever since this, he has a site where he archives almost everything she says online. She made a post about how she prefers cats over dogs, then he archived that and posted the link to the archive on his site saying "never trust a dog hater with anything" and it just goes on, and on, and on for years.

When she even makes a passing mention about him, even if he's not named or only vaguely mentioned, he chimes in, and posts a link to his site with some variation of "don't trust her, she's not to be trusted" and links to pages on his site which were all made by him over the years in an attempt to maliciously discredit her. It's often a gish-gallop of links.

He also says that he's made an account on every site he knows of, likely in an attempt at surveilling or intimidating her.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 58 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Go talk to a fucking lawyer and stop seeking advice from people online!

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 7 points 13 hours ago

The truth has never been more truer.

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 29 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

If these twisted statements are provably false - even if they contain elements of truth - then this is a case of libel.

Creating accounts everywhere someone is in order to track what they do and say is stalking.

Making repeated efforts to ruin a person's day is harassment.

Contact law enforcement and/or legal representation. I'm not either of those but it seems like there's a strong case here.

[–] TinyLittlePuni@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

He's hiding links in text that twists what's actually in the links and those links do go to posts she made but it's like he hides links in text so people don't click them. A single sentence on his site can contain upwards of five or even ten links.

[–] SL3wvmnas@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 hours ago

See it these links show up if you "view source" on a browser. Print the source as evidence to bring to a lawyer. Or find a lawyer who either knows how to find stuff online or has a good IT Person.

Be prepared for much more DARVO and other mind games. Be aware Law enforcement can not shield you from all of this, but is a good ally to have. Try to find other local women only clubs or victim helping organizations as allies.

Be aware if you search for them online, there are nutjob sites designed to hurt women in need. Go in person if you can, to pick up their vibe before you open up.

Stay safe! Best of Luck!

[–] DiagonalHorse@lemmy.ml 14 points 22 hours ago

If he has uploaded photos of your friend from her social media to his site and she took those pictures, she could have a pathway towards DMCA striking his site down. Talk to a lawyer about it

[–] miked@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Contact the registrar and host of the site. One or both will likely shut it down.

Also contact the police as others have said.

Send DM if you need assistance.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 166 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OP, your friend is the victim of criminal cyberstalking and harassment. This dude should be reported to the authorities

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

My guess is that the guy has several red hats in his closet

[–] MnemonicBump@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago

Oh, without a doubt

[–] Coopr8@kbin.earth 111 points 1 day ago

This is stalking. She could get a restraining order which includes interacting with her online content, so if he continued to repost it would be a violation of the order.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 50 points 1 day ago

Get the police involved

[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Call an attorney to see if there is anything that can be done.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago

Also, start archiving the website in order to compile evidence for later. Don't count on this person leaving the site up.

[–] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Have a detailed, copy-pasted reply with links ready to go. Every time he pops his head up anywhere, remind anybody watching that he is a known pedophile. Also, talk to a lawyer about the possibility his behavior might rise to the level of harassment.

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Careful, falls under libel if you can't prove it.

[–] troed@fedia.io 2 points 16 hours ago

I don't think I've seen OP mention which country their friend is a citizen of. Many countries have libel laws that don't care if the claims are true or not, but instead just look at what your intention is by making them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TinyLittlePuni@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Depending on the jurisdiction you're in accusing someone of being a pedophile may not be a good idea. You should definitely talk to a lawyer though, preferably before you make any accusations.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 18 points 1 day ago

No, absolutely terrible idea. That’s a lawsuit waiting to happen. He isn’t, from what you’ve said, a “known pedophile” because he hasn’t been charged and convicted of anything that would make him so.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why hasn’t she gone to the police?

[–] TinyLittlePuni@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because she's in the US and this guy's from Australia.

[–] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 1 points 6 hours ago

Does she know which Australian state? Likely every state has cyberstalking rules, but it would be a state law.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago

Call the police.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

post anonymously?

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (31 children)

I highly doubt a random website will get any traction. Why doesn’t she just make her social media private? Why hasn’t she blocked this random dude

[–] truite@jlai.lu 2 points 22 hours ago

If the guy is dedicated enough, and he seems to be, it won't work. He'll find a way to gain access to the private account. He'll make others accounts.

You can make a new, private account without saying who you are, but you lose people, it's exhausting to be careful full time and it's unfair.

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›