this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2025
76 points (94.2% liked)

World News

50139 readers
2304 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

China announced its plans for future cuts to greenhouse gas emissions on Wednesday, producing a scathing response from experts who said they were much too weak to stave off global catastrophe.

The world’s second-biggest economy is also the biggest source of carbon dioxide by far, and its decisions on how far and how fast to shift to a low-carbon model will determine whether the world can stay within relatively safe temperature bounds.

China’s plans are to cut emissions by between 7% and 10% of their peak by 2035 – a long way from the 30% cut that experts said was feasible and necessary.

Xi Jinping, the president of China, made the announcement at a summit of world leaders to discuss the climate crisis at the UN general assembly on Wednesday afternoon in New York.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I do hope China gets Fusion first.

The US isn't even in the running afaik.

Last I heard it was China and France running neck and neck.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Regardless, I don’t think anyone expected fusion soon enough to help with the climate crisis. Hopefully it will be there to continue to grow our society for the future, but we have to have human contribution to climate change effectively solved more quickly than we could get fusion.

Maybe it will help us stay in the green for the century or two it takes the climate to recover, assuming we haven’t passed any tipping points

Tbf here in France i hear experts saying that it will be a slow process and it may be viable between 2050 and 2100, so it won't be of help to reduce emissions right now

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've read on Reuters that China is probably under promising and they will do better than they claim. At least China understands that climate change is real and is trying to do something about it. Unlike some other country. The bar is on the floor, yet some countries are struggling.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Yeah. I hope China is doing more than they promise, because USA refuse to do their part.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't think slowing climate change is the motivation... More like to reduce dependence on fossil and become a leader in renewable techs.

Word is run according to flow of money and it's glaced in bullshit and empty promises.

Green tech is just not financially cutting it, so we are gonna drive this capitalistic mud ball of the cliff and blame everyone else.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Plus a little pollution.

  • Supposedly they were really affected by how bad the air was getting but their most available fossil fuel is coal
  • China needs huge growth in electricity, both to run manufacturing and to continue bringing a billion people up to developed world standards of living. But they don’t have much oil resources and don’t want to depend on outsiders
  • renewables and EVs are the future and they have a path to dominate those industries. Might as well go all in on new tech rather than try to compete with old tech incumbents
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How much does the second worse contributor to global warming contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gasses? Oh, they don't, they believe that the scientific fact of global warming is a hoax...

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Speaking as a “proud” American, we are not second worse. We are worst overall. We’re number one! WERE NUMBER ONE!