this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
80 points (87.0% liked)

Technology

75597 readers
2021 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...In Geekbench 6.5 single-core, the X2 Elite Extreme posts a score of 4,080, edging out Apple’s M4 (3,872) and leaving AMD’s Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2,881) and Intel’s Core Ultra 9 288V (2,919) far behind...

...The multi-core story is even more dramatic. With a Geekbench 6.5 multi-core score of 23,491, the X2 Elite Extreme nearly doubles the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (11,386) and comfortably outpaces Apple’s M4 (15,146) and AMD’s Ryzen AI 9 370 (15,443)...

...This isn’t just a speed play — Qualcomm is betting that its ARM-based design can deliver desktop-class performance at mobile-class power draw, enabling thin, fanless designs or ultra-light laptops with battery life measured in days, not hours.

One of the more intriguing aspects of the Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme is its memory‑in‑package design, a departure from the off‑package RAM used in other X2 Elite variants. Qualcomm is using a System‑in‑Package (SiP) approach here, integrating the RAM directly alongside the CPU, GPU, and NPU on the same substrate.

This proximity slashes latency and boosts bandwidth — up to 228 GB/s compared to 152 GB/s on the off‑package models — while also enabling a unified memory architecture similar in concept to Apple’s M‑series chips, where CPU and GPU share the same pool for faster, more efficient data access...

... the company notes the "first half" of 2026 for the new Snapdragon X2 Elite and Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme...

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VeloRama@feddit.org 3 points 23 minutes ago

Can't wait for Linux to support it and Tuxedo creating a laptop with it.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 21 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Snapdragon X2 Elite Extreme

That doesn't sound very high end, I think I'll wait for the Pro version, preferably Pro Plus.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It sounds like an advertisement for a condom or dildo

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 57 minutes ago

Don't you want to put on some of this thermal paste?

Where this is going, baby, you don't need no thermal paste!

faints on floor

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 12 points 1 hour ago

BadDragon X2 Elite Extreme MAGNUM

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 121 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

Keep in mind the original X Elite benchmarks were never replicated in real world devices (not even close).

They used a desktop style device (with intense cooling that is not possible with laptops) and "developed solely for benchmarking" version of Linux (to this day X Elite runs like shit in Linux).

This is almost certainly a premeditated attempt at "legal false advertising".

Mark my words, you'll never see 4,000 points in GB6 ST on any real products.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

I imagine things would be much closer if they put a giant heatsink that Ryzen 370 they're comparing and ran it at its 54W configurable TDP instead of the default 28W.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 38 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

They also used the base M4, not M4 Pro or Max

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like they're also using two different Intel chips in their testing for some reason.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 3 minutes ago

I'll take cherrypicking for $500, Alex

[–] tal@olio.cafe 7 points 3 hours ago

Ah. Thanks for the context.

Well, after they have product out, third parties will benchmark them, and we'll see how they actually stack up.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 hours ago

I saw someone liquid cool an Arduino to push it to the max, but you couldn't declare it to be a regular benchmark...

[–] a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world 54 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Let me know when these X elite chips have full Linux compatibility and then I’ll be interested. Until then, I’ll stick with Mac, it has the better hardware.

[–] clucose@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Friendly Question: has M4 full linux support?

[–] a_fancy_kiwi@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

I think I see what you’re saying. My gripe is that if I want a laptop/tablet with a great ARM chip, with long battery life, my options all force me to use one of two operating systems that I’d prefer not to use for ideological reasons. If I’m forced to use one, because I want an ARM device, I might as well use the one that has the best hardware. M5s are right around the corner and the MacBook Airs are really competitive.

If I misinterpreted your question, then no, as far as I’m aware, none of the M series has FULL support. The M1s and M2s are pretty close though.

[–] Toes@ani.social 15 points 4 hours ago

No, neither does M3. You can read more about this project here: https://asahilinux.org/docs/platform/feature-support/m4/ Even M2 and M1 support is still being worked on.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Not who you asked, but at bare minimum macOS continues to be certified UNIX.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] __siru__@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Absolutely ture, your comment being? I think they were simply referencing the fact that there is a lot more software out there that can be made to semi easily run on linux/unix based systems.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Also while Linux is not the same as UNIX, interacting with them is much more similar than, say, interacting with Windows. They use a lot of the same conventions and managing macOS can be a lot like managing Linux if you want it to be.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

As long as you don't try to use sed or grep. Literally the only reason I learned perl was because of the flag incompatibilities between macos Unix and Linux utils.

[–] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Yeah true, but if you use macOS expecting Linux that doesn’t make any sense. Then it’d just be Linux with a different DE lol. Hopefully doesn’t come across as snarky but pointing these differences out always seems rather pointless to me, they do exist but I mean yeah it’s not the same os.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Also while Linux is not the same as UNIX, interacting with them is much more similar than, say, interacting with Windows.

If you use only GUI, the underlying system philosophy is practically irrelevant.

If you use CLI, you can literally use the same distribution within WSL as you use on a Linux computer. I like using openSUSE's zypper in WSL more than I like brew on macOS.

[–] galaxy_nova@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

Yeah brew sucks ass

[–] clucose@lemmy.ml -1 points 3 hours ago

Man… I knew this answer would come. 😀

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 30 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I'll wait for independent benchmarks, thanks.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 11 points 3 hours ago

With actual devices

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 37 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm going to call semi-bullshit here, or there is a major revisionist version or catch. If this were true, they'd be STUPID to not be working fast as hell to get full, unlocked Linux support upstreamed and start selling this as a datacenter competitor to what Amazon, Microsoft, and Amazon are offering, because it would be an entirely new class of performance. It could also dig into Nvidia and AMDs datacenter sales at scale if this efficient.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 16 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

They put desktop cooling on the testbench apparently.

They’re also comparing to only the base M4 chip, not the Pro.

Also the M5 could still come out this year. But it also might not so it’s still a fair comparison till then.

Anyway if you’re looking for a Windows laptop specifically and don’t need anything that doesn’t run on ARM, it might be pretty damn good. I’d still wait for independent benchmarks.

[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Qualcomm is pretty dumb. Even if this were true, they’d still be leaving Linux support to the community.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 29 points 5 hours ago

This will be super cool when we actually have OSs that can run on them!

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 hours ago

Windows 11 will turn this into a 486.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

How's the GPU drivers though? Especially to me for Linux. These should be used in PC gaming handhelds but Qualcomm support is mediocre

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

linux on arm is not mature. on windows, typically emulation of x86 is used. They'll need to also support all of the gpu libraries for gaming.

If it's anything like their windows driver support then also awful. Maybe things have improved in the last year or so, but has Qualcomm ever put real effort into making ARM Windows laptops good?

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 8 points 5 hours ago

I highly doubt this is accurate. Be nice, but doubt it.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 hours ago

Oh no, each new chip is going to be tree at something than another chip and vice versa. Anyways, what did people have for lunch?