also just gonna write this one down, but it's only a mild killing
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
613 points (99.5% liked)
Not The Onion
18262 readers
1730 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They need $7,500 per resident and, according to the article, they intend to raise that money over three years. I don't know what their property values are like but if I assume an average house price of $300k, a current tax rate of 2%, and three people per house then they're currently getting $6,000 in property taxes per person over three years (which they need to spend on other things) and so an enormous tax increase really is necessary.
(I'm neglecting non-residential property tax payers. A tiny town like this probably doesn't have many.)
Your back of the envelope math is good, but small towns usually have very low property values due to not being super desirable places to live (and declining populations) a realistic average would be 100k average home value. Some will be smaller, older houses and only worth around 25-50k, some will be much newer houses built in this century worth closer to 200-300k but most will be older homes that people continue to live in and maintain worth around 100k
load more comments
(2 replies)
At this point I’d move across county lines to somewhere nearby that won’t have double the property tax rate.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Some coach diddles kids and the families and kids have to pay for it through insane tax hikes and less school funding? In what world does that make sense?
They already put the coach in prison for 15 years and probation for 25 years after that. Why punish the local community too? Yes, the families should be made whole, but not at the expense of objectively innocent tax payers and schoolchildren.
That's the way the System supposed to work though. The local school district is supposed to be run by those citizens. They elect the school boards that set the policies and appoint the administrators. It's supposed to be representative government. The citizens are supposed to monitor what this board is doing and if they don't like it vote them out. Make their voices heard. Show up at school board meetings. That's their responsibility. If they don't want to do it then they have to live with the consequences.
In a community that's small, there is no way many of these same families and homeowners weren't aware of that predator.
The community enabled him and now the community has to pay for that choice.
What's your alternative solution?
load more comments
(27 replies)
The school was likely complicit in ignoring warnings. This is why board members should be held personally liable if they are negligent in their duties.
load more comments
(7 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)