this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
598 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

75792 readers
2553 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 23 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So now 3rd party app stores need an ADB loopback to work around that.

Not hard to do, but uselessly annoying.

[–] Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Installing the third party stores would be way harder than it is right now if they do that though. No way the devs of e.g. f-droid are getting a verification on an app that bypasses Google's new 'safety measures'

[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I could imagine something like Sidequest happening on Android.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 44 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

We really need some money poured into the Linux mobile space because this is a terrible direction to go.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

dug my pinephone out of a drawer yesterday and gave it a whirl. still pretty rough unfortunately even after updating postmarket os.

Cool being able to SSH into my phone though

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I'm still hoping they can get to a state for more general users. I really want one still. I need a Linux phone doing the old sidekick designs.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

The main issue will be application support.

Linux running on the desktop in 2025 is helped immensely by everything being web based. So long as you have a browser you are fine for a lot of general computing.

The phone space is ruled by apps. The phone makers and the companies developing apps prefer it this way.

Getting a banking app, or Uber or Facebook Messenger to work on a Linux phone is going to be a massive pain in the ass (ignoring the rest of the OS which is definitely not even close to useable for the general public).

I would love a Linux phone but we are so far away.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

tbh part of the rough experience for me may be down to the hardware. the ubports version of the pinephone i have is quite low power. 2GB memory and a little ARM Cortex-A53

tis sluggish

[–] VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 hours ago

We need better Mobile Linux / Android distros

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 24 points 6 hours ago

ThIs ApPLicAtIoN iS DaNgErOuS

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 24 points 6 hours ago

Free market and openness my ass.

[–] excral@feddit.org 34 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

Is this even legal in the EU? The majority of phones in the EU are Android phones so this effectively gives Google control over what apps can be installed to the majority of phones. I thought the Digital Markets Act was designed to prevent exactly this.

[–] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 1 hour ago

This is essentially Google moving to do what I always thought was Apple's malicious compliance on the DMA, but which European courts seem to have accepted as just fine. I'm pretty miffed at Google for sinking to Apple's level on this.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Google will become the exact same as apple, third party stores are technically "allowed", but requires Google's official stamp (digital signature), it's same with Apple. Its probably legal since Apple is already like this.

A corporation like Epic Games will be left alone since they can afford lawyers. An open source volunteer dev making a Youtube alternative client will get their certificates revoked under dubious "ToS Violation" claims and they won't have money to sue.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago

I think some recent EU proposals that make Google responsible for ensuring users can't install malicious apps is what have caused this to happen though. I could be wrong but I think I remember hearing about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›