this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
-28 points (34.1% liked)

Memes

53557 readers
692 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] antsu@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Can't tell if this is criticism on non-vegans or if someone just really wants it to be socially acceptable to fuck a cow.

[–] kplaceholder@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Assuming good faith, I guess this is about the hypocrisy of everyone acting extremely morally righteous when it comes to the sexual exploitation of animals and then tolerating, accepting and celebrating all other forms of exploitation of animals. I really hope it is not going the other way around.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not the person you replied to, I agree with your interpretation but then I'm confused with the post title. "Fucking Vegans"?... Um...?

[–] phdeeznuts@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The title is a joke. Playing on the typical 'smh vegans blah blah blah' and the wanting to fuck animals part of the top of the meme.

[–] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is it because cows are technically vegans(?

OMG! This post is about cow-fucking!!!

/j

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cows are not vegans, though.

[–] KazuchijouNo@lemy.lol 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is it because they drink milk as calves? Then no mammal is vegan :0

[–] tobogganablaze@lemmus.org 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Because they occasionally eat small mammals (and insects).

[–] phdeeznuts@mander.xyz 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes that is correct. Sorry I didn't think it would be received as anti-vegan.

[–] kplaceholder@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

To be fair, I read it correctly the first time and didn't occur to me that it could be interpreted in any other way until I went into the comment section.