this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
5074 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 3 points 9 months ago

Meta will suffer "immediate and irreparable loss" in the absence of an emergency relief

Well, I didn't know nor care about this book before, but now I want to read it.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The ruling says that Wynn-Williams should stop promoting the book and, to the extent she could, stop further publication. It did not order any action by the publisher.

Emphasis mine. RFC 2119 strikes again :D

SHOULD: This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course.

I’d ask how the Meta lawyer could sleep at night arguing such a bullshit and openly caustic line of rhetoric, but the answer’s probably “like a baby, in an extremely expensive and comfortable bed”

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What the fuck kind of ruling is that? It's optional?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not really "optional", but more like the court knows they can't stop the book from existing or being produced, as that would be actual censorship. This is an attempt to limit its reach and pretend it doesn't exist, like the shadow banning on most social media whenever you say sex, fuck, death, shit or other bad-bad no-no words.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

other bad-bad no-no words.

Luigi

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

"My mom says you need to stop"

She's your mom, not mine; IDGAF.

[–] Pogogunner@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago

How the hell does the American Arbitration Association think it's going to bind a third party to a decision? What agreement does Macmillan have with them?

I order the American Arbitration Association to pay me one billion dollars.

This has the same level of validity. Facebook's stooges can pound sand.