this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
82 points (98.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

44017 readers
713 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

She called him out for making inappropriate sexual comments online to someone she knew, who was 15 at the time. He ended up getting banned. This caused this man to develop a spiteful obsession with her because according to him, she is slandering him as a pedo.

A few months ago he found her social media and his obsession is now in full force. He's boasted about mass reporting her, making false accusations against her, and replying to irrelevant Tweets with accusations in an attempt to stir up drama. She didn't even mention him or talk about him, he just replied to random Tweets with confrontations and when she refused to engage, he replied again using his sockpuppet accounts agreeing with his own reply. He's also said that he's downloaded her photos to his computer (including ones that are a year or two old) and uploaded them to a porn site. She doesn't wear makeup so it's immediately obvious just by looking at her photos she's under 18. When people confront him he uses DARVO tactics. On some sites he's on he pretends to be civil but on his own site his motivations are much more clear. Several individuals in his friends group have allegedly either owned or defended CP.

The lengths he'll go to in order to find every social media she has is insane and based on his post timings he's often staying awake all night to do this.

And yes, she has reported him, but sometimes the moderation is useless and he's very good at using DARVO to try and make it seem she's the one harassing him. He's also using sockpuppet accounts to make it seem like multiple people are making the same accusations when really it's all just him.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 3 days ago

GO TO THE FUCKING POLICE

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 44 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Call the cops. Harassment online is illegal, and depending on the nature of the pics that part may be very illegal. Even if he somehow doesn't have any legal consequences from anything he's done so far, having police reports in place for stuff now will make it easier for him to potentially face consequences later.

Talk to a lawyer if it's complicated, a few hundred dollars may get a consultation that can set you up for how to frame things in a way that makes it more likely that the cops will do something. But even just calling the cops and laying it out (read up on the laws, stay focused on stuff that's specifically banned by statute in a provable way as much as possible, sometimes people want to "give context" too much) may be pretty productive.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 3 days ago

She needs to contact the police, like others have said, and she needs to get a restraining order. The police can, depending on the local laws, build a harassment and possibly a stalking case. The restraining order isn't going to get him in 'trouble,' but it will let the criminal case have more evidence and weight, and gives your relative a place to start putting emphasis behind her reports.

Unfortunately, she'll also have to give up social media. It's a route to her, and it's not one that will be closed down. Creeps like that dude will come back again and again, because it's relatively easy to avoid real bans, if he even gets one. She needs to not respond to anything from him after sending one message, "I do not wish to speak with you. Do not contact me again." Whichever route he's going through at the time, use that one, making sure it's one that you can keep a record of. Then, anytime any contact is attempted again, note the time, date, a brief summary of whatever was said (from him, neither she nor anyone else should respond to anything) and contact the police again. Even if the cops are lazy and often useless in online harassment, they want you off their backs, and especially the higher ups don't want a disgruntled citizen with an actual ignored crime complaining about them, because the winds of public opinion can turn on things like that. The records of contact are what gives the cops a kick in the ass. It's evidence that they don't have to do anything to get, and it's also what a judge likes to see when it comes to a harassment case. It's also critical that she (and anyone else) never responds. Tit-for-tat may not make his acts 'legal,' but it makes it easy for a defense attorney to poke holes in the prosecution's case that he was harassing her. DARVO doesn't work if the only communication is from him. If she's responding to him, it sets up a scenario where there is a 'conversation' going, and if she isn't ending it that doesn't sell a harassment case to a jury very well.

Keep records of what he posted, where posted it, and when his site you mentioned is updated as well. If the harassment is mostly taking place online,

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

If you go to the bank and get twenty dollars in nickels all nice and rolled up, then you can put them inside of three sweat socks and have an understanding relative drive over to the stalker's house and make a donation to his medical GoFundMe.

With the leftover change you can also get an ice cream.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Can someone tell me what darvo tactics mean? Or tell me if I just don't want to know. I'd Google it, but OP mentioned CP and if it's related to that, I don't want to Google it :(

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

DARVO (an acronym for "Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender") is a reaction that perpetrators of wrongdoing, such as abusers or sexual offenders, may display in response to being held accountable for their behavior. Research indicates that it is a common manipulation strategy of psychological abusers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARVO

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender.

"I'm not stalking you. You're too ugly for anyone to stalk. Quit stalking me!"

[–] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 9 points 3 days ago

What jurisdiction is she in? And (if she knows) what jurisdiction is he in? (Jurisdiction as in country, and if the country has them, state / province). That will make a big difference to next steps.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Police involvement may help get him to back off, but be prepared for cops to ignore or minimize what she's going through. Many cops are stalkers and abusers themselves. From personal experience having someone else to corroborate can help and also having extensive documentation can help get a PPO. I wish you the best of luck, its really not an easy situation and can escalate quickly.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

So, you can speak to a public defender at any time you’re interacting with the criminal legal courts…this includes as a victim- under your right to legal counsel.

I would suggest asking someone at the court house.

They can assist you with far better advice navigating the shitshow that is the courts and may be willing to help get photos taken down.

[–] xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
  1. Block and ignore. Might be tempting to engage. It's not in your favor. Patience is your friend.
  2. Abandon the accounts the perp has identified. Delete your accounts and stop identifying yourself on the public internet. Or take a break. Patience is your friend.
  3. Involve the police. Start colleting a body of evidence. Don't engage. Don't provoke.
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The world is not well-equipped for dealing with people like this. He's clearly a cluster B personality type, and desperate for attention. Good attention, bad attention, it doesn't matter. This is reactive abuse, as he's trying to provoke her to get a reaction. It may sound lame, but the best way to deal with this type of person is to completely ignore them. He is a child begging for attention. Don't give it to him. Whatever he does should be viewed as trivial and be ignored. As he continues his concerted efforts and gets absolutely no reward for it, it will make him feel insignificant and he'll eventually look for his thrill elsewhere.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago
[–] hodgepodgin@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Can you ID where this guy lives using OSINT? Even just the location of his house is enough if you don’t know his name.

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today -2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

This is 100% blackmail your relative is a victim of, as she's likely been unsafe since she basically called this guy out on his nonsense.

She needs to use these guides... she needs to become a ghost of sorts: https://untraceabledigitaldissident.com/articles

These need to be read every day, and she'll need to catch up on how she can turn her privacy around. The reason why I said that she was being blackmailed was because she didn't practice good OPSEC.