This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.
☭ Matrix homeserver and space
☭ Theory discussion group on /c/theory@lemmygrad.ml
☭ Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive, libgen
^Image\ from^ ^this\ article^
So, might seem dumb on my end, but I actually never heard of Gödel's loophole. Do you think he just predicted that a President could collude with Supreme Court and just rubberstamp everything or was it some 4d chess nonsense regarding constitutional convention/Article V or the ability to create new states?
What do you all think it is? I can also see nothingburger as it really didn't go anywhere, which seems odd considering the nature at the time.
if i were a famous logician i would make a big thing about a loophole in the constitution and 100 years after i die they'd find out it was something stupid like "no one has to follow the law lol"
Exactly what I was thinking, I would not be shocked if that was the case. All though, Godel wasn't like a rube or anything so I dunno. Woulda been a huge hit to the credibility.
What intrigues me is that the judge straight up was like
"nah, don't wanna hear it."
"But I can prove it! Einstein brought me here with-"
"nope. Not opening that can of legal worms, fuck off."
Good day. Coming somewhat out of the left field here (pun not intended), but I figure this is a good place to request.
There used to be a link floating around, of a cia internal report on Stalin, showing that he does not hold singular power in USSR, contrary to the "dictator" narrative. I couldn't find it otherwise. Could someone please send me this link?
Thanks in advance!