this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2025
203 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
2926 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When Google and Amazon negotiated a major $1.2bn cloud-computing deal in 2021, their customer – the Israeli government – had an unusual demand: agree to use a secret code as part of an arrangement that would become known as the “winking mechanism”.

The demand, which would require Google and Amazon to effectively sidestep legal obligations in countries around the world, was born out of Israel’s concerns that data it moves into the global corporations’ cloud platforms could end up in the hands of foreign law enforcement authorities.

For Israel, losing control of its data to authorities overseas was a significant concern. So to deal with the threat, officials created a secret warning system: the companies must send signals hidden in payments to the Israeli government, tipping it off when it has disclosed Israeli data to foreign courts or investigators.

To clinch the lucrative contract, Google and Amazon agreed to the so-called winking mechanism. The strict controls include measures that prohibit the US companies from restricting how an array of Israeli government agencies, security services and military units use their cloud services. According to the deal’s terms, the companies cannot suspend or withdraw Israel’s access to its technology, even if it’s found to have violated their terms of service.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the deal violated (admittedly questionable, but still valid) US laws? Make the companies pay dearly for this, so they'll think not only twice, but a dozen times if ever asked again.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make the companies pay dearly for this

No, not the company, this would only put in in danger the employees (guess who would be fired in case of downsizing).
You need to dearly punish who signed the contract.

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

A key aspect of a corporation is to protect execs liability. Anything they do is the legal responsibility of the corporation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_liability

Also see Citizens United in the US.

[–] borth@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 month ago

"If you want our money, you are not allowed to stop our services when you find out that we violated your terms of services... I mean IF!"

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

The guy who's only part of the crime was watching out for the police is also guilty of the crime.

These executives should consider that, especially given that the war crimes and genocide charges are a matter of public record so they can't claim ignorance.

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

According to sources familiar with negotiations, Microsoft’s bid suffered as it refused to accept some of Israel’s demands.

...why is Microsoft the upstanding company here?!

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

It was definitely not on ethical grounds. Most likely just got worried the bad PR would outweigh the profit, or the "you cannot get out of this contract" clause

[–] starblursd@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not so much upstanding... They're just kneeling instead of laying down

[–] 5too@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'm just pissed that even with that they're still head and shoulders above the competition

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

And Google and Amazon still haven’t realized Israel is going to use this to hijack their entire operation.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Google, Amazon, Meta, IBM, Oracle, Microsoft, etc. The list of genocide enablers goes on and on. These companies are already at war with humanity.

If we were sane we would be talking about dissolving these companies and jailing the criminal executives that agreed to this.