this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2025
745 points (97.6% liked)

Selfhosted

52704 readers
324 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the best pieces of self-hosted software ever to exist.

Edit: This is Immich! for the folks who don't know.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (7 children)

As someone who only used the stock synology app and has always wanted to try something else, what features and things does this do better? I am close to trying it out just to see. Im sure it will solve my 1 big issue where I can't control the location of photos that default to my application storage, which is pretty small, instead of my actual storage array.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago

I did the same after they revamped the backup functionality in the app, and it now finally seems to be trustworthy enough as my main method to get my pictures from my phone into the cloud. Could finally cancel my Google subscription as well.

[–] Chaphasilor@feddit.nl 7 points 3 days ago

Same, just bought a server license yesterday!

[–] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

im like maybe one of few people who barely take photos. its great because i dont need to worry about the costs of cloud storage

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pfr@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

Same bro, just became a supporter myself. Worth every dollar!

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Yup, purchased myself 2 days ago. Absolutely deserve all of the support!

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Aufgehtsabgehts@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you use Nextcloud, install the App Memories and you will have the same functions as Immich plus all the upload functions of Nextcloud.

But if you are not interested in all the Nextcloud functionalities (including contact and calendar sync, musicserver, filesharing, etc) and just want picture management, Immich is the better choice.

[–] EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That's exactly what I have, and that's exactly what I wanted ... DARN ... oh well. I guess it's nice to have the document sync as well

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Never used NC but this just works.

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Buying my copy soon!

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the reminder, done as well :)

[–] net00@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I've tried Immich, but found my plain SMB shares already did 80% of what ~~immich could do~~ I wanted. The remaining 20% I could do easily with my favorite photo/video viewers (looping, filtering, tagging, location data).

I also hate how it's only a web portal for desktop. There's no native desktop app, and no seamless integration with file browsers, video players, etc.

Maybe I look at it again in a few years

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It's a photo album? I kept hearing about it. I've been using a combo of just plain files, and sometimes nextcloud. Immich sounds like something to look into.

[–] sonofearth@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The ML is really good. Google's Face recognition is over-confident sometimes and is difficult to remove the tagged faces and add correct ones. Immich's is very accurate and if it misses something I can just add them — 1 step instead of 2 with Google's.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also, if it turns out that immich misses too many faces, or has too many false positives, or creates too many different persons for one face, or groups different persons together, you can tune that. You can set the threshold values for all these things, or just use a different ML model and reanalyse your whole library. Even on an older CPU without any special ML features, it takes less than a night to reanalyse a hundred thousand pictures or so.

[–] rapchee@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

also, it's just stating the obvious, but it's not on a company's server that will sell all your info to the highest bidder

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 days ago

Certainly, especially because of the search features, social features and the ability to organise your photos, and the nice looking user interface.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›