"True our business plan is trash, but if we had infinite energy it would scale."
...ok? That isn't a flex?
this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2025
129 points (98.5% liked)
Technology
7505 readers
520 users here now
News community around technology, social media platforms, information technology and governmental policy surrounding it.
What doesn't fit here?
The core of the story has to be technology focused.
- If article mentions "AI" in a sentence and then talks about business economics that doesn't make it tech news.
- Gaming is too many layers removed from technology. There are many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Transporation is too many layers removed from technology. EVs while use many cool technologies have many dedicated communities that are a better fit for it.
- Entertainment is too many layers removed from technology. While sometimes it can fit here, business or cultural aspects of it are a better fit for dedicated communities.
- Cybersecurity. While it heavily focuses on technology, most of the time it's too technical for most people who are not already invested in it. Should be posted in a dedicated communities unless it has broader connection to other tech areas.
Post guidelines
Title format
Post title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL format
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefix
Country prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
No, you don’t understand! If you use our product to ask it about things you don’t know anything about, its answers are indistinguishable (to you) from an expert opinion, even when it’s wrong. This is a pure win for society with no down sides!
As an engineer, I definitely could think of a lot of cool ideas that'd fix problems if I just had unlimited energy or infinite resources.
However, since I'm not a CEO I don't get paid for said "what ifs"
"bro imagine if we could actually use all these cards we bought, we'd be the best at this AI thing"
I'm still waiting for an actual business case. Who's going to consume all this slop? And pay for it at one point?
These guys are openly admitting that all these investments are going into hot air. Altman has also already admitted we’re in a bubble. But it doesn’t matter because the line goes up anyway.
So many actors in the AI space are admitting to issues that I wonder if they're not trying to blunt the crash.
It's already been proven over and over and over, but this is another point of evidence that the line has no relation with reality, and is entirely made up.
To make more electricity, they should try using some of the hot air that constantly comes out of Nadella’s mouth.
Why the hell are they spending money on things they literally can't use? Who authorized that purchase?
Every card they buy isn't available to a competitor.
Only half joking.
Especially because they are only good for AI, and they rapidly deprecate in value.
Thats the entire point of the capitalist ideology. Ask a christian why they rape children or a Muslim why they pray.
Yeah, okay. If we could pull the reins on this collective AI idiocy a little, that'd be greeeat.
lol holy shit Nadella is such a fucking tool
Is he trying to get our sympathy, because nobody is doing that.
Problem solved
Chips that are really only competitive for a year are sitting on shelves. Good thing they reduced consumer GPU capacity to make these. The rest of us might be paying reasonable prices otherwise.
Edit: Just another reminder that capitalism only works when all actors are behaving rationally. There is nothing rational about what's going on in this market right now.
Sorry folks, we're not heading towards The Jetson's.
We're heading towards The Matrix.
Good.
Actually retarded
Ah the E.T videogame strategy.
Can't wait for everyone to bury their ai bullshit in the New Mexican desert.
Good. GFY
I’m sure Microsoft can outspend Joe Shmoe on electricity so just buy more, duh. „Satya Nadella drowning in pussy, Microsoft CEO says” has about as much credibility though.
Hurry up and make the analog computing chips and cut power requirements 1000x or more
It would have been so easy to avoid this. Just buy tons of solar panels from china. But nooo that's clean energy! The evil empire must run on dirty energy only! Cartoon villains.