this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2025
600 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

76830 readers
1716 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 289 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Tackling the problems that really matter. Good job, FBI.

Fucking clowns.

[–] BD89@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago

Well don't you know?

All they value is money.

[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago

Oh matters to them all right, and their boss.

[–] Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago

And it's not like they're gonna stop them anyways.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 229 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Seems like another attempt to stifle the flow of information.

[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 124 points 1 week ago

I'll take Things fascists do for 400 please, Alex.

[–] XiELEd@piefed.social 22 points 1 week ago

I remember when ICE took down Zlibrary...

[–] Balldowern@lemmy.zip 141 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Why isn't the FBI doing anything about Epstein island list ? That's more important than some archive website.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 64 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Whose bread I eat, his song I sing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 1 week ago

Because the archive site points out their deceptions, lies and cruelty

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

Because the victims of the rape of children in the Epstein case don't have the money. The perpetrators do.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 14 points 1 week ago

They probably are. They're trying to make sure it hasn't leaked onto archive.is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 116 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can just go fuck a duck. Archive is super useful. Leave it alone.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

go fuck a duck

Poor duck....

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 110 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The FBI is probably going nuts here because someone inadvertently archived the Epstein files and everyone at HQ is panicking. They need to purge it for the Internet before someone discovers that archived content, and so they’re using CP as an excuse.

In fairness, if they are hosting those files, there is a very good chance there is cp

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 91 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)
[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 30 points 1 week ago
[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AI stealing our work. The collapse of social networks. The need to pay journalists to produce impactful journalism. Here is why we are asking for your email address to read 404 Media.

https://www.404media.co/why-404-media-needs-your-email-address/

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So basically you need to spam me. Because a donation plea every so often . . .doesn't get enough addresses to sell?

I'm saying it's a flawed implementation is all.

[–] NotSteve_@piefed.ca 26 points 1 week ago

Purely anecdotal but they're the only news site that I've ever given my email to and I actually enjoy seeing their emails. They send entire (interesting) articles that can be read with no CSS/tracking images enabled and their monetisation is a small text ad that breaks a single couple of paragraphs.

I've never gotten an email from them that was begging for money or anything like that, just basically an RSS feed of interesting articles

[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The idea that forcing a signup (building a web of information about a user through the use of cookies and other browser metadata) to protect against AI (that is gonna use tooling, mirrors, proxies and any number of fully working methodologies) is ludicrous.

They just want to track who you are, what you do, and then sell that data which should never have been gathered in the first place as part of their advertising revenue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Softest paywall ever - they do such good work, they can have an anonymous email of mine no problem

Magic link’s so annoying though, just wanna password (they’re journalists not techies though is the long and short of it)

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 80 points 1 week ago

Friends of tech Bros Incorporated.

Regulatory capture is complete in the states.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The archive runs Apache Hadoop and Apache Accumulo. All data is stored on HDFS, textual content is duplicated 3 times among servers in 2 datacenters and images are duplicated 2 times. Both datacenters are in Europe, with OVH hosting at least one of them.

To avoid detection, archive.today runs via a botnet that cycles through countless IP addresses, making it quite difficult for grumpy webmasters to stop their sites getting scraped. Access to paywalled sites is through logins secured via unclear means, which need to be replenished constantly: here’s the creator asking for Instagram credentials. Finally, the serving of the website is also subject to a perpetual game of cat and mouse: “I can only predict that there will be approximately one trouble with domains per year and each fifth trouble will result in domain loss.” As of today, archive.today still works, but users are redirected to archive.md.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Infamous"? More like wonderfully useful.

[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It occasionally catches things that archive.org misses too. Also really nice to have an alternative.

It’d be nice to have a way of doing decentralised archiving while still keeping the trust. If you’re trying to prove that a site really said something at a certain date to another person, pointing to your own archive is kinda useless.

[–] InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] conorab@lemmy.conorab.com 2 points 4 days ago

It would help! It would establish that an archive was made no later than the date it was recorded on a blockchain (assuming the archiver isn’t also the one the made the original content in which case they can upload it after making the “archive”). You would still need to prove the trustworthiness of the archived data and at the moment the only thing we have for that is just trusting the archiver.

You could do something like have multiple archivers archive the same site in s stripped down for like plain text (so that differences caused by time or day, ads, etc don’t change the hash) and that way you can say that X amount of archivers agree that the site looked like that at that time.

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No for real, why? Why are they persuing this?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

It's hard to rewrite the past if someone's keeping receipts

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That would explain why adguard’s public DNS started blocking it (labeled vaguely as “legal request”).

[–] mierdabird@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Guess I'll be getting around to starting my own pihole after all

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] girlthing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The owner should release the source code / configuration, in whatever state it's in, before things escalate further. It'd suck for all their work to go down the drain. I'm sure there'd be people willing to adopt the project and host instances.

If you agree and you have Tumblr, would you consider asking them anonymously?

https://blog.archive.today/ask

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The news sites are trying to have it both ways. Serving the news articles to visitors and then covering them up with a paywall with browser tricks.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I'm a bit sympathetic to them — they do need to get paid to keep operating, and ads don't cover the cost of providing news anymore

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I would put that more on the ad networks, if the ads were related to the article, it may generate a few more clicks. The ads are completely random and built off a profile they assume would contain relevant info about me... but it doesn't really seem to be accurate (this is kind of by my own choosing though).

Instead articles about rebuilding cars should have ads related to perhaps rebuilding cars and not some fucking nutritional supplement or some other unrelated thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] a_person@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Damn, I was wondering why it was down. I hope it goes back up soon, its such a useful tool.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I get around paywalls by disabling JavaScript when I read the news

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I use the mozilla reader mode

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maniacalmanicmania@aussie.zone 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Bypass Paywalls Clean is still around.

Bypass Paywalls Clean for Firefox

Extension: https://gitflic.ru/project/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-firefox-clean

Support only: https://github.com/bpc-clone/bpc_firefox_support/issues

Bypass Paywalls Clean for Chrome

Extension: https://gitflic.ru/project/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-chrome-clean

Support only: https://github.com/bpc-clone/bpc_chrome_support/issues

Updating

For Firefox at least, if you pin the extension to the browser toolbar (or whatever the space next to the address bar is called) you will see a little yellow triangle badge whenever there is an update. Click the extension icon to update.

For Firefox mobile and forks, you may get a notification that there is an update but I haven't found a one click solution so I just go to the repo, download the xpi and install. To install from file on mobile you need to go to Settings > About Firefox > Tap the logo several times until you see Debug enabled > Go back to main Settings > Under Advanced look for Install extension from file.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Question: how does this site differ in function to the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 week ago

They dont let sites opt-out, and they do a much more seamless job of enabling people to archive paywalled content

[–] foodandart@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 week ago

You can access pages that are still actively behind any given site's paywall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

When are we going to start talking about abolishing the FBI?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NGC2346@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If it's someone operating from Russia, they can beat it and get lost, because it won't disappear.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It's more than famous, it's infamous!

load more comments
view more: next ›