this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2025
404 points (99.0% liked)

Selfhosted

52788 readers
881 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prices are rising across Netflix, Spotify, and their peers, and more people are quietly returning to the oldest playbook of the internet: piracy. Is the golden age of streaming over?

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cyber@feddit.uk 5 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Sooo... where's the self-hosted material coming from if Bluray's aren't being produced any more?

If the high seas dries up, are we up shit creek and have to stream?

[–] Bronzie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 26 minutes ago

Webrips. That’s how we get movies and shows today without waiting for physical media being released

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago

Yeah, piracy is the last bastion of privately controlled media files

Doesn't seem like it's going away though

[–] tomkatt@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

No illusions on my part. RAID5 NAS with periodic disk archive backups.

  • Books
  • Audiobooks
  • Retro game ROMs
  • FLAC music collection
  • Movies, TV, and anime series

Got what I need locally and intend to keep it that way. I'm sick of sites like Amazon with "Buy Now" buttons that are really "rent now via restrictive terms and only via devices we approve until we decide you no longer need access."

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

maybe I've been living under a rock but I don't get all this emphasis on hosting. What's wrong with having a file on your device that you just play when you want to

[–] groet@feddit.org 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

That is the smallest scale of self hosting. The server and the client are the same device. It is also the most insecure way as you probably don't have any backups and very limited storage space.

Actually self hosting is the next step when you decide you want 5+ TB of data and have it automatically create backups. Digital storage media degrade pretty quickly and if you just have your movies on a hard drive in your computer, after 5-10 years you might start to lose quality or some files completely.

[–] N0x0n@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 minutes ago

start to lose quality

Wait... That's a thing? You can lose video quality off a video file on a HD over time?

[–] damo_omad@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

You do have the file on a device... On a server, and you can play it on any client you like

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 6 points 4 hours ago

Self-hosting allows you to have all your files on all your devices, like many have used to with the streaming services. Also, some smart TVs specifically require to connect to some server to grab movies from.

If you don't need any of that, regular hard drive will suit you best.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago

For me, it's a matter of restoring the convenience and UX that you've given up by leaving the big providers.

[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Personally fed up with the greedy streaming companies. Price hikes, movies and series disappearing, lower quality because you don't pay for the premium deluxe 2.0 subscription, and the most annoying of all: advertisements, even though you do pay $$ for premium deluxe ultra 3.0 pro max subscription.

Selfhost 🙌🏻😊- music is always available, same with movies. Perfect!

...well, almost perfect. It really is quite expensive, but also very fun and rewarding getting it to work.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 5 points 3 hours ago

The expenses are mostly upfront though. I've spent like $400 on a relatively fancy NAS and two 3TB WD Red CMR drives five years ago, and since then, there was that.

Of course, depending on your use case, there could be extra expenses as well, some of them recurring: -Bigger drives -Backup storage (I already had a place I could back up to) -Domain name and DNS records (if you expose it to the public Web with a URL; you can otherwise just use a VPN tunnel to access NAS from outside the home network, which is free unless you do anything fancy) -Some kind of paid software (if you don't enjoy the perfectly good collection of open-source apps) -Etc.

Now, for the streaming alternative: Netflix Standard: $18/mo Spotify: $12/mo Total: $30/mo, or $360/yr. Just these two services alone.

Your NAS system will pay off in a little over a year (maybe two years if you go all in with huge drives, fancy NAS configs, extra expenses here and there), and it's smooth sailing from there.

My unit works for 5 years already with no maintenance, is still fully supported by the manufacturer, and I don't expect to replace it in a few more years.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

laughs in ~~pirate~~ data archivist

If something isn't worth waiting just a bit of time to torrent it, as opposed to just instantly streaming it?

Good rule of thumb: It's slop, you don't actually care for it, it's just white noise.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Alternatively, your setup is kinda slow and you're kinda lazy (not used pejoratively).

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I can't hear you over my 10TB storage disk of movies.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Imagine not having a double digit bay NAS with triple digit number of Tebibytes.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Well...I preferred double parity for my 4-bay NAS :p

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Oh nowadays you can get 26tb drives pretty affordably, so a 4 bay NAS could be getting you 50TiB now.

Of course most people don't need all that though.... including me honestly but hey, that data isn't going to collect itself.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Bought it about 1 year ago from overtime work hours (as compensation).
So there were budgetary constraints. Plus I was looking for drives that were quiet and wouldnt rattle my brain out (it runs in the same room I sleep in).
So far it's quiet enough to sleep while in light use but I had to schedule stuff while I am usually at work to not disturb my rest too much.

Edit:

Of course most people don't need all that though.... including me honestly but hey, that data isn't going to collect itself.

No, no. You do need that ;D
Personally I have 4x16TB but I have allocated only 46% (12.96/28.07TiB) for use.
And that's currently enough for me.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

pretty sure that's meant in a light hearted fashion

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Might be.
But I'd rather use a meme phrase in that case like "Those are (absolute) rookie numbers".

Not taken in bad blood but also not really funny (to me).

[–] irmadlad@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I guess I'm a unicorn in that Netflix or equal has no draw for me. I'm not a movie watcher. I'm more interested in how they made it vs the actual movie content itself. I don't even watch TV of any kind. I have no Spotify or equal, music streaming platform. I just can't take the incessant ads every couple songs, and it's the same flipping ad over and over. Instead, I listen to my music collection which is fairly large, most of it from my days of running a licensed internet radio station back in the pre-Napster days, and read. Not much into fiction or novels etc. Give me history, news, anything to do with computers, etc. I mean, the internet is a vast repository of data, and I have yet to surf to the end of it. At no other time in human history have we had the sum total of the world's knowledge, maybe not wisdom, but knowledge, resting in the palm of our hand or sitting on a desktop. The great libraries of Alexandria would look like my magazine rack in comparison. I just find that reading helps me digest the information better, and in the case of news, it allows me to cross reference, highlight, search, compare ad nauseam, in search of the truth trifecta, which you'll never get on your TV screen.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 37 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

They’re going up again?

I dropped all of those. I just have a couple services now.

CBC Gem (mostly to support CanCon and local media), one streamer, and I migrated to Qobuz for music.

I’m the spring I’ll go to yard sales for dvds/blu rays. They’re like a dollar there, which is reasonable.

A ton of content I liked is now owned by fascists and Larry Ellison, so I don’t even want to buy new media anymore.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Do you know what ORACLE stands for?

[–] msokiovt@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago

I wonder of Palantir is connected to Oracle. Likely so.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Tm12@lemmy.ca 6 points 7 hours ago

One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 15 points 16 hours ago

The price of ownership is maintenance.

Prices keep rising because people will pay ANY price to avoid personal responsibility.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm probably going to be allowing most of my streaming subscriptions to lapse over the next year or two. Gonna stick with Dropout and PBS, but that might be all.

[–] pemptago@lemmy.ml 9 points 12 hours ago

+1 for PBS streaming. It's a great value and highly underrated.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world -1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Self-Hosting? What happened to saving things onto a hard drive?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

Self-hosting is saving to a hard drive. The difference is how it's accessed. If you save it to a (presumably portable?) hard drive, you can only access it from the hard drive. "Self-hosting" allows it to be stored on a hard drive, inside a server, which is then accessible from anywhere, on any device, at any time.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

that's self-hosted.

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 hours ago

Self hosting essentially stores all of your data on your hard drive, but it also allows access to that via local network (while at home) and over internet via secured tunnel (e.g. Wireguard tunnel, Tailscale) while away from home.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl -1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Nah, federation is a valid alternative to self hosting

[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 11 minutes ago

You're going to "own" digital content through...federation? How does that work?

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

In what way? You don't own anything on the fediverse. The people who run the various instances do.

Maybe they even have a TOS that says you own it, but then what? its still up to them to continue to host it, and they have no contract with you.

Unless you are self hosting your own instance, and only count what is on that, you own no more than with larger social media sites.

To be clear, I think that federations certainly are better than monolithic sources for a variety of reasons for real people, but they aren't a solution for ownership.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

disagree. legally a government can forcefully take down a community but it's far more difficult to police a physical ring of pirates.

pirating in the late 90s early 2000s was mostly done through physical interaction. you could download content from places like Napster, limewire, etc, but the volume of which content spread the fastest was at LAN parties.

I filled up a brand new 250gb drive after one LAN party in 2002. I still have all that content 23 years later.

point is, if we could harness the power of a "trust" content sharing would run rampant.

[–] DirtPuddleMisfortune@feddit.org 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

So we should do LAN parties again then!

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

completely agree.

Thanks for reminding me. I still have shows I need to download.

[–] MolochAlter@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The only streaming services that make sense to me are the niche ones that focus on original content.

Wrestling streaming services like njpw world, trillerTV, or wrestle universe, specialised libraries like Shudder.

Generalised shit for mainstream content is not worth the money.