this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
175 points (93.1% liked)

Technology

76871 readers
3136 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 36 minutes ago

Know what? Fair. Good for them.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

so all Lemmy takes from this article is that Sam Altman is gay.

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Tim Cook, Sam Altman, Peter Thiel.

We have enough data points to suggest that being gay doesn't insulate you from being greedy and corrupt.

That's important, too.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Why would it? I have never thought to myself, this seems like a bad person but he is gay so maybe not. :)

[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

In a different time, it was popular to think that capitalism would be better if minorities were winning at it.

A few girlbosses and Diddys later, I'd like to think we know better.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 2 points 1 hour ago

Yeah ok.

Yeah i keep seeing so many awful people in leadership positions, but so many good people outside of leadership.

So we have any good leaders anywhere? Its an honest question at this point.

[–] Darkness343@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I am surprised the American government is even backing them.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Neoliberal utopia. The wealthy elite destroying the world and forcing eugenics on the masses fly a rainbow flag

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

Its working.

[–] VerilyFemme@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

It's almost as if the forces of good and evil don't abide by the line we draw in the sand, for some reason.

[–] melfie@lemy.lol 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

I feel like this kind of thing can create a “Great Filter” situation. Tech seems to work well and most babies are genetically engineered now, but wait, why is everyone dying off before 30? Nope, it’s not the genetic engineering, and anyone who says that is a tinfoil hat wearer. Just look at all of these studies funded by big corporations and captured government agencies who have financial interests in its success—you’re not one of those anti-science idiots are you? Ok, actually, the data is in and it is the genetic engineering. Humanity is dying off, not reproducing fast enough, and will be extinct soon, but it made a bunch of billionaires even richer, so all good, right?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

If that were the case, wouldn’t the ones who didn’t get the genetic engineering be far more likely to reproduce and stride along with natural selection? I have a hard time seeing that event ever happening, short of the human population en mass deciding to engineer every baby on the planet before a single generation of which could have lived life and been studied for its effects.

What I think is more likely as a great filter is humans eventually settling on the idea that organic matter is really terrible medium for life. So, something with much more longevity, strength, efficiency, and brain power gets synthesized and we move in. At a certain point, wouldn’t biological life die off because life tends to yield to its more evolved forms? If us meat bags had to compete, how could we?

and I think there are more interesting answers to the Fermi Paradox than the Great Filter. For example, the expansion of space not being something we can overcome in travel. Or, maybe the way we perceive space is just so anthropic—we’re making poor assumptions about other beings.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 90 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Odd way to learn altman is gay.

Kinda shocked I've never seen a "worlds richest gay man!" Headline. That feels like low hanging fru-

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

I worry more about that he is a full blown psycho.

[–] Takios@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 7 hours ago

Gay is only bad if the poors do it, of course /s

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 10 points 10 hours ago

Honestly I don't think it's any of our business. Even rich assholes are allowed to have a private life. Although with some (Musk, Trump) that private life is so fucked up it's impossible to ignore, but generally I'm totally fine with not knowing who they fuck.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 23 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Does Thiel not have more money?

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 3 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Another one I didn't know is gay.

Props to msm for not making it a big deal

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Oh that one's because he goes nuclear when they do. He funded the killing of Gawker because they outed him.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago

Thiel was outed by Gawker and made it a mission to secretly fund the Hulk Hogan lawsuit which resulted in Gawker going bankrupt: https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattdrange/2016/06/21/peter-thiels-war-on-gawker-a-timeline/

[–] mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago

Thiel killed the outlet that outed him.

[–] _Nico198X_@europe.pub 9 points 10 hours ago

ah, ok, so GATTACA is up next. got it.

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The same guy who admitted he couldn't raise his child without ChatGPT btw.

[–] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago

This is a very good reminder - thank you.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

So we’re skipping the Bell Riots and straight into Eugenics War?

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Give me Butlerian jihad or give me death!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 88 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

The ability to reduce diseases and disorders in newborns sounds wonderful, until you find out which techno-fascist is behind the movement.

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 31 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The other issue I have is that this is an example of a recurring issue in which the tech obsessed ultra wealthy declare their plan to solve a problem for which a very straightforward policy solution already exists.

We don't need tech to extend lives or feed the hungry. We just need to remove the paywalls to existing resources.

[–] MummysLittleBloodSlut@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, here's an easy way to prevent most birth defects:

Free nutritious food
Regulating toxic chemicals
Prenatal education and healthcare

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

None of that will deal with an inherited genetic disorder

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 210 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 88 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

further proof their homophobia is performative to have the peasants infighting about trans people they probably never met in their life.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 55 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

The trans people they never knew they met.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 46 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

the headline misspelled eugenics.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 8 minutes ago)

Ah yes, please give me more of that sickle cell anemia.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 42 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

In before this turns into "I want my baby to have blue eyes and 150 IQ"

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

High IQ would be sure nice, but has a large number of genes involved. Not that you need a high IQ as a farmer in a low technology future.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Since when are IQ scores indicative of intelligence?

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 50 minutes ago

G factor is highly correlated with real-life achievements. I make no other claim.

[–] poopkins@lemmy.world 16 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

It's an interesting ethical debate.

I have a hereditary condition which passes only by the X chromosome, so should I, as a man, abort a daughter? Because now the risk is too high and I've elected to simply not have children. It would be great if I could fix the single swapped base pair that would otherwise cause disfigurement and life-long health problems.

[–] KatakiY@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm always conflicted. Like eugenics is the end goal for these fascists but also... We should try to prevent hereditary defects rtct

[–] 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 4 hours ago

The unforeseen effects should be enough to give us pause.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 30 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

They do realize that this is how most zombie apocalypse movies start. Genetic tapering to stop diseases.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›