Do they expect Cloudfare to vet every single site they host or something? This is the most stupid shit I've read today, even if intellectual property wasn't actual bullshit.
Technology
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
Can you imagine an internet where the owners of every router was responsible for the content of every packet that crossed it?
The reason is probably that they warned them, though I don't see how is cloudflare responsible.
Why not? Buying and selling stolen goods is illegal. I know it's a hussle, but the company is rolling in money and forcing it to be bear the cost of being compliant with the law seems reasonable.
On the other hand, intellectual property and copyrights are bullshit, so I'm a bit torn.
Making manga more accessible legally wouldn't hurt, though.
As always, it's not a price problem, it's a service problem. Since Japanese publishers hate getting Manga outside the country it seems like, it's a self inflicted wound.
Indeed. This this truly a WTF issue. And it gets even worse when you are not from US, like EU.
I have a big physical manga collection, but I can't imagine paying a single cent to access manga digitally, let alone a subscription. For each one on my collection, I've already pirated digitally to read them. But I'd rather keep a permanent physical copy than being allowed to read it each month for a price.
It turns out the outage was for them to scrub the evidence. /s
Not that I think they deserve this fine but 3.2 million might as well be slap in wrist.
I saw $479.1 million in 1st quarter.