this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2025
338 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

76992 readers
3027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

I sold off my Nvidia stock about 3-4 weeks ago in the effort of divesting myself of all the AI futures. I also had sold off Amazon, MS, Intel, etc. (I never owned Tesla). With the money I bought Berkshire Hathaway, med tech/pharm stocks and stock of my local energy supplier since they hiked my rates those MFers, as well as a chip corp opening a fab here. Also can't go wrong with MC. I keep away from crypto and consider AI a poison pill... worse than the real estate bubble in the early 2000s. Just want to say, I am not a huge investor... I just decided to buy stocks instead of shoes cuz they take up less space and tend to increase in value vs lose value. No one sells their shoes.

I also moved some money into European and Asian stocks.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I made good money off nvidia. Not going to be a bag holder.

[–] khepri@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago

Passing the same $300 billion dollars back and forth between 5 companies does not make a great quarter ya nob, everyone sees how close the game is to falling apart.

[–] FahrenheitGhost@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Meanwhile on the Titanic:

"People are getting so upset about a little water in the hull. They clearly don't appreciate how great the trip has been so far!"

[–] Cyberflunk@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

now they are interested in linux

coward bitches

[–] verdi@feddit.org 23 points 14 hours ago

Rich man complains investors saw through his circular financing scam to artificially inflate his ~~criminal gang's~~ enterprise's stock price.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago

The market didn't appreciate that you had a good quarter?

The fuck kind of bullshit logic is that?

[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

People just cashing out into other ventures it is easier to double your money elsewhere than Nvidia reach 10 trillion.

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago

aww, Jacket man fall down go boom?

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 115 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I never understood how capitalists claim market prices are the true source of truth and yet disagree with it when it’s not the outcome they like.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

capitalists claim market prices are the true source of truth

Until any sizable amount decides to sell and it all falls apart because it's actually not the source of truth lol.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 12 points 13 hours ago

That's the neat part, it's a scam

[–] greenbelt@lemy.lol 9 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

In a true free market stock prices would become totally random noise. Even the best capitalist theorists (economists) came to this conclusion.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 0 points 7 hours ago

Capitalist theorists, you say? I call them astrologers for the wealthy.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 37 points 1 day ago

Add a few personality disorders and it starts to make sense.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 197 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let me fix that phrasing: "One of the richest men in the world complains that others did not give him more money after his business made so much money."

What a sad existence. Find some other form of validation, dude.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Pretended to make a bunch of money. Stock buybacks and giving AI companies money so they'll use it to buy your hardware doesn't count.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a gold rush, the real money is in selling shovels. But you have to take cash upfront.

[–] greygore@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Which is fine and dandy until the gold miners realize that they aren’t going to find enough gold to make it worthwhile and stop buying shovels and the market value of your company depends on your ability to continue selling shovels. Twenty five years after the dot com bubble burst, shovel seller Cisco is only just now reaching the same stock price they peaked at in early April of 2000.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Jensen doesn't seem to realize that the only company profiting from AI is nvidia, and they're profiting from companies that are losing money on AI. It's a very fragile ecosystem being over-inflated. A bubble, if you will.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 26 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Which is fine and dandy when you're paying fat dividends and not treating the inflated stock as the end goal itself.

Nvidia's annual dividend was .022%

To put that into perspective, Shell's is 3.83% and McDonald's is 2.41%.

Nvidia is showing all the signs of a business that has lost the plot. They're spending all their actual profit on buying their own products for other businesses and calling it an investment into infrastructure.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 140 points 1 day ago (6 children)

the CEO said. “We’re basically holding the planet together — and it’s not untrue.”

No. No dude. No. Quite the opposite.

[–] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago (1 children)

These billionaire fucks are completely delusional. They have to go.

[–] verdi@feddit.org 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

What I heard from scientists is claims need validation, I say we need power in our experimental setup to verify claims. Jensen says he is holding the planet together, so, let's eliminate Jensen and his next 5 in command in NVIDIA, n=6, and see if the planet breaks down. As a control, we cull Musk and his next 5 in command in Tesla and SpaceX. If the planet doesn't break down, we start doing it internationally to billionaires till there's a sign of a breakdown so we find out, empirically, how many billionaires are needed to support the planet. If we run out of billionaires before the planet breaks down, then the conclusion is the planet doesn't need billionaires. Who else wants to do science?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 130 points 1 day ago (8 children)

The arrogance in some of those quotes. Holy shit.

Jensen, you and your entire company could disappear without a trace, today, and the world would be just fine.

Probably better, in fact.

[–] shittydwarf@piefed.social 35 points 1 day ago

Much better

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

The entire market saw the US government shovelling money in to your loading dock, Jennie. The market may be ignorant, but they're not stupid.

[–] colourlesspony@pawb.social 84 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well, most of that "incredible" quarter was just IOU's from Sam Altman.

[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 hours ago

Oh, the guy who intimated that the US gov will have to bail their asses out because their futures were TBTF. I will be happy to see that guy in prison for his pyramid schemes.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

IOUs backed in turn by IOUs

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

IOUs backed in IOUs that are from Nvidia, just a circle where no money actually changes hands

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago

iou-ception, kiting ious/.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 41 points 1 day ago (7 children)

The stock is down because the Overton window has shifted. Two or three months ago, AI was the future and question that was lunacy. Now it is a mainstream point of discussion that AI is a giant bubble, that it is entirely likely to pop at some point, and that the efforts pushing it so hard are bordering on irrational given the actual capability of the product.

If AI bubble pops, Nvidia loses. No more big tech companies with blank checks and open orders for AI chips that basically amount to 'please send us as many AI chips as you can manufacture whatever it costs we will pay'.

And, if anything there may be a surplus of AI chips and hardware in the market as companies that have built entire data centers for AI suddenly realize that paying millions for electricity so online idiots can generate videos of cats racing Roombas down F1 tracks is not a trillion-dollar business model.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] DegenerateSupreme@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

CEO complains that his blatant circular investment infinite money glitch isn't convincing people that these perpetually unprofitable businesses are actually worth further investment.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

He’s had an ego like this for a long time. I’m glad more people see it now.

load more comments
view more: next ›