this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
50 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

5334 readers
121 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vikingtons@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Can we talk about how they recently shoved perplexity in there as an included search engine?

[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Please I don’t want to lose Firefox too 😰

[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is what you want

https://librewolf.net/

It's literally the latest FF but with the telemetry and AI ripped out, and proper adblocks etc

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If anyone tried Librewolf previously and found it too restrictive, I changed 2 settings that were game changers for me. I disabled fingerprint blocking and installed canvas blocker instead. Then I enabled Mozilla sync. Bam, perfect web browser for me at least.

[–] zmrl@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ya I also use librewolf and I find it fairly intuitive to start at a more hardened place and enable convenience as needed. Though these days I find most sites work great even with full fingerprint protection.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 1 points 1 month ago

I have to disable the fingerprinting because it fucks up time detection. Like if I look at sports schedules it has me in a radically different time zone. Canvas blocker doesn’t cause that problem for me.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Not an option anymore since they stopped supporting Manifest V2. uBlock Origin is mandatory for any browser today.

[–] Cooper8@feddit.online 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What would it take for a fork of Firefox to become the main branch one must wonder? I know I switched to LibreWolf and IronFox when this all started, not FireFox. Now I'm hearing WaterFox works on the platforms I use (is it as good?)

Neither of these projects are doing core feature development on the browser engine though, as far as I can tell. I guess what it would take is a heap of cash for them to really compete.

I see LadyBird and the grumbles about their sponsors, but at least they are really doing work from the core rather than modding.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

WaterFox is just Firefox without the Mozilla parts people don't like (AI, sponsored content, telemetry). It is not as hardened as Librewolf, which can break sites with it's anti-fingerprinting techniques. It's a perfect browser for casual use (and widest compatibility).

[–] Cooper8@feddit.online 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I wish projects like this would offer simple "security profile" settings that would allow you to batch change the relevant settings between the most common suggested settings for different usecases.

Just "General use" and "Privacy" profiles would go a long way.

[–] PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago

Honestly, Librewolf is pretty functional. It used to break all kinds of stuff, but now it's just a couple of sites with fingerprint protection issues, and there's a couple-of-clicks way to disable the strict fingerprint protection on any site you care about where it's causing problems.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately it's not that simple. At least that's the message I got from reading Librewolf's documentation out of curiosity.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

This is a rant about opt out not being perfect, afaiu. Firefox still provides better AI control than alternatives, in that you can choose the model, including a private one. Is this wrong?