Lo and behold, ladies and gents, the land of the free, where even jerking off is chargeable...
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
Children browsing the ugliest part of the dark web in 3... 2... 1...
I suppose dvd order porn will become a thing once again.
Or alternatively we can start sharing bootleg USBs with our friends.
The Internet had begun its enshitification stage, as governments look to control and lock down access to the internet people will find new and creative ways to bypass these barriers. For one, things like Tor or going back to DVDs and physical media might get more main stream.
I don’t get the purpose of this.
It's a coalition of groups with different purposes
One group wants to ban porn entirely
One group want to collect data on everyone. Your porn habits can be valuable if you're a future political rival
Some people believe it will prevent children from seeing porn
Others use it as a way to assert control over sex workers, especially female sex workers
Probably a few other smaller groups too. End of the day, none of them have your interests at heart
You clearly haven't thought of the children.
Nah it's just a precursor to having all your online activity tied directly to your identity. That's the purpose. I'm sure plenty of misguided elders in government think it's about saving kids from porn though.
It's almost like these reps want to have the same leverage over their constituents that Russia has on them...
.../s
.../?
For anyone curious, the privacy video is in their latest(?) blog post on their site. It should be viewable anywhere as it's outside the NSFW area and before the 18+ notice.
(Just bear in mind that while it should be SFW, it is still under a porn-site's domain.)
Fortunately lawmakers think all internet porn is on PornHub and that you find it by going to w-w-w dot yahoo dot com and typing "sex video" or "naked ladies" in the search thing.
The only porn they have experience with are polaroid photos that they got from a friend who knows a guy who makes tasteful art for clients with "particular tastes."
I'm going back to physical media. Guess that will include my porn soon too.
Hmm, might actually still have some old playboy somewhere 🤔
Sorry, MAGA. If you want to stroke it to trans porn, you need to show ID.
If this doesnt make people stop using those sites, nothing will. :)
And yeah, like others have said, its of course a system that will be used to control people and remove semi-anonymity from the web.
It's not just for porn anymore though. My new phone required it to use certain applications. Facebook requires it to sell on marketplace. As for conversations about it, all of this went to supreme court at least 6 months ago, spoilers, they lost in terms of protecting our privacy. There are days THEY win inside my head & I assume they're recording & adverty within my dreams. you don't even need to be a tin-hat wear crazy to believe things like that anymore.
When I went on vaca a few months ago I was caught off guard with this. Kind of crazy that this is going to be everywhere probably... I will never give them this info, there are always alternatives. I just used VPN that week which worked fine.
🤔 I'm not sure that lawmakers really understand what they're up against. If most VPN locations all eventually require government ID for porn, then some people will likely seek porn from places/networks that are... Less legitimate.
Not downplaying that this is real dumb, but "half the US" is meant to be misleadingly attention-grabbing. The states that are doing this are not the most populous states. No law like this exists in NY or CA, for example.
I don't know the amount of the population living under these laws, but it is not nearly half, even if half the states have passed such laws.
I did the math and it's 49.37% of the population, based on the 2024 census data, or 49.94% if you exclude Puerto Rico and D.C. I suppose mostly due to Texas and Florida being in the list, but also Ohio, Georgia and North Carolina with over 10M people each.
Here's the raw data
Based on the table from Wikipedia, and the list of states in the article.
| State | Population (2024) | Requires Age Verification | Population Requiring Age Verification |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 39,431,263 | 0 | |
| Texas | 31,290,831 | x | 31,290,831 |
| Florida | 23,372,215 | x | 23,372,215 |
| New York | 19,867,248 | 0 | |
| Pennsylvania | 13,078,751 | 0 | |
| Illinois | 12,710,158 | 0 | |
| Ohio | 11,883,304 | x | 11,883,304 |
| Georgia | 11,180,878 | x | 11,180,878 |
| North Carolina | 11,046,024 | x | 11,046,024 |
| Michigan | 10,140,459 | 0 | |
| New Jersey | 9,500,851 | 0 | |
| Virginia | 8,868,896 | x | 8,868,896 |
| Washington | 7,958,180 | 0 | |
| Arizona | 7,582,384 | x | 7,582,384 |
| Tennessee | 7,227,750 | x | 7,227,750 |
| Massachusetts | 7,136,171 | 0 | |
| Indiana | 6,924,275 | x | 6,924,275 |
| Maryland | 6,263,220 | 0 | |
| Missouri | 6,245,466 | x | 6,245,466 |
| Wisconsin | 5,960,975 | 0 | |
| Colorado | 5,957,493 | 0 | |
| Minnesota | 5,793,151 | 0 | |
| South Carolina | 5,478,831 | x | 5,478,831 |
| Alabama | 5,157,699 | x | 5,157,699 |
| Louisiana | 4,597,740 | x | 4,597,740 |
| Kentucky | 4,588,372 | x | 4,588,372 |
| Oregon | 4,272,371 | 0 | |
| Oklahoma | 4,095,393 | x | 4,095,393 |
| Connecticut | 3,675,069 | 0 | |
| Utah | 3,503,613 | x | 3,503,613 |
| Nevada | 3,267,467 | 0 | |
| Iowa | 3,241,488 | 0 | |
| Puerto Rico | 3,203,295 | 0 | |
| Arkansas | 3,088,354 | x | 3,088,354 |
| Kansas | 2,970,606 | x | 2,970,606 |
| Mississippi | 2,943,045 | x | 2,943,045 |
| New Mexico | 2,130,256 | 0 | |
| Nebraska | 2,005,465 | x | 2,005,465 |
| Idaho | 2,001,619 | x | 2,001,619 |
| West Virginia | 1,712,278 | 0 | |
| Hawaii | 1,446,146 | 0 | |
| New Hampshire | 1,409,032 | 0 | |
| Maine | 1,405,012 | 0 | |
| Montana | 1,137,233 | x | 1,137,233 |
| Rhode Island | 1,112,308 | 0 | |
| Delaware | 1,051,917 | 0 | |
| South Dakota | 924,669 | x | 924,669 |
| North Dakota | 796,568 | x | 796,568 |
| Alaska | 740,133 | 0 | |
| District of Columbia | 702,250 | 0 | |
| Vermont | 648,493 | 0 | |
| Wyoming | 587,618 | x | 587,618 |
| 343,314,283 | 169,498,848 | ||
| 49.37% |
You can still hold up a picture of Norman Reedus to bypass age checks right?